Skip to main content

In Case of Doubt See the Manual: A Comparative Analysis of (Self)Learning Packages Qualitative Research Software

Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC,volume 621)


One of the first precautions that a consumer/user has when acquiring a new product is related to how to use it. In this context, the user manuals can be assumed as one of the main communication channels between the companies that develop the products and the user. Regarding the use of software packages, literature indicates that one of the decisive factors for user’s dissatisfaction is related to the difficulty in learning how to work with a software. In this context, Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS) enterprises are increasingly looking to develop features that can decrease user’s learning curve of their tools. In this way, this chapter illustrates a comparison of user support features, such as: support and typology of the User Manual; Training; Tutorials; Forums; Frequently asked questions (FAQ’s); Workshops. Through a systematic exploration of the native sites guided by a dedicated checklist, it was sought to identify the singularities of the resources to support (self)learning of the different software packages. In order to systematize the offers that each user can find, enabling him/her to choose the package that provides the solutions that best respond to his/her learning style. It was concluded that among the different software packages there are no noteworthy disparities, only in two packages analysed there were shortcomings in the offer of formative and autonomous learning.


  • Qualitative analysis software
  • User guide
  • Self-learning
  • NVivo
  • Atlas.ti
  • Dedoose
  • webQDA
  • QDA Miner

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions


  1. Costa, A.P., De Souza, F.N., Reis, L.P.: Necessitamos realmente de metodologias qualitativas na investigação em educação? Rev. Lusófona Educ. 29, 27–30 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baugh, J., Hallcom, A.S., Harris, M.E.: Computer assisted qualitative data analysis software: a practical perspective for applied research. Rev. del Inst. Int. Costos. enero/juni (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pinho, I., Rodrigues, E., de Souza, F.N. Lopes, G.: Determinantes na Adoção e Recomendação de Software de Investigação Qualitativa: Estudo Exploratório. Internet Latent Corpus J. 4 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Einspänner, J., Dang-Anh, M., Thimm, C.: Computer-assisted content analysis of Twitter data. In: Weller, K., Bruns, A., Burgess, J., Mahrt, M., Puschmann, C. (eds.) Twitter and Society, p. 435. Peter Lang Publishing, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eranki, K.L.N., Moudgalya, K.M.: Comparing the effectiveness of self-learning java workshops with traditional classrooms. Educ. Technol. Soc. 19, 59–74 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kolb, A.Y., Kolb, D.A.: The Kolb Learning Style Inventory—Version 3.1 2005 Technical Specifications (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Inal, Y., Güner, H.: Ensuring success in a large scale software project: an examination of the learning styles and characteristics of the potential end users. Gazi Univ. J. Sci. 4, 535–540 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pashler, H., Mcdaniel, M., Rohrer, D., Bjork, R.: Learning styles concepts and evidence. Psychol. Sci. Public Interes. 9, 105–119 (2009)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Silver, C., Rivers, C.: The CAQDAS Postgraduate Learning Model: an interplay between methodological awareness, analytic adeptness and technological proficiency. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 19, 593–609 (2015)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Silver, C., Woolf, N.H.: From guided-instruction to facilitation of learning: the development of Five-Level QDA as a CAQDAS pedagogy that explicates the practices of expert users. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 18, 527–543 (2015)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. di Gregorio, S.: Is qualitative software really comparable? Reflections on “the Experiment”: an “Expert” view. Forum Qual. Soc. Res. 12 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reis, L.P., Costa, A.P., de Souza, F.N.: A survey on computer assisted qualitative data analysis software. In: 2016 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), pp. 1–6. AISTI, Gran Canaria (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bazeley, P., Jackson, K.: Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo. Sage Publications, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. QSR software: Discover the NVivo Suite

    Google Scholar 

  15. Atlas.ti: ATLAS.ti: Quality Software Developed in Germany.

  16. Walter, S.A., Bach, T.M.: Adeus Papel, Marca-Textos, Tesoura e Cola: Inivando o Processo de Análise de Conteúdo por meio do Atlas.ti. Adm. Ensino e Pesqui. 16, 275 (2015)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. Jakub NiedbalskiŚlęzak, I.: Computer assisted qualitative data analysis software. Using the NVivo and Atlas.ti in the research projects based on the methodology of grounded theory. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brito, M.J.M., da Silva Caram, C., Montenegro, L.C., Rezende, L.C., Rennó, H.M.S., Ramos, F.R.S.: Potentialities of Atlas.ti for data analysis in qualitative research in nursing. In: Costa, A.P., Reis, L.P., Neri de Sousa, F., Moreira, A., Lamas, D. (eds.) Computer Supported Qualitative Research, pp. 75–84. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Atlas.ti: What is ATLAS.ti?

  20. Dedoose: Meet Dedoose.

  21. Talanquer, V.: Using qualitative analysis software to facilitate qualitative data analysis. In: Bunce, D.M., Cole, R.S. (eds.) Tools of Chemistry Education Research, pp. 83–95. American Chemical Society, Washington (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dedoose: Features.

  23. Dedoose: Security Workspace and Teamwork.

  24. webQDA: O webQDA.

  25. de Souza, D.N., Costa, A.P., Neri de Sousa, F.: Desafio e Inovação do Estudo de Caso com Apoio das Tecnologias. In: Neri de Souza, F., Neri de Souza, D., Costa, A.P. (eds.) Investigação Qualitativa: Inovação, Dilemas e Desafios. Ludomedia, Oliveira de Azeméis (2015)

    Google Scholar 


  27. MAXQDA: Welcome.

  28. Provalis Research: Text Analysis Tools.

  29. Lewis, R.B., Maas, S.M.: QDA Miner 2.0: mixed-model qualitative data analysis software. Field Meth. 19, 87–108 (2007)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  30. Derobertmasure, A., Robertson, J.E.: Data analysis in the context of teacher training: code sequence analysis using QDA Miner®. Qual. Quant. 48, 2255–2276 (2014)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  31. Provalis Research: Qualitative Data Analysis Software.

  32. Provalis Research: Technical Information.

  33. Provalis Research: User Guide.

  34. Neri de Souza, F., Almeida, P.A.: Investigação em Educação em Ciência baseada em dados provenientes da internet. In: XIII Encontro Nacional De Educação Em Ciências. Escola Superior de Educação, Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco, Castelo Branco (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hewson, C., Yule, P., Laurent, D., Vogel, C.: Internet Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social and Behavioural Sciences. Sage Publications, London (2003)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  36. Freitas, F., Neri de Souza, F., Costa, A.P.: O Manual de Utilizador de um Software de Análise Qualitativa: as perceções dos utilizadores do webQDA. Rev. lbérica Sist. Tecnol. Informação 19, 107–117 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Silver, C., Rivers, C.: The CAQDAS Postgraduate Learning Model: an interplay between methodological awareness, analytic adeptness and technological proficiency. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 19, 593–609 (2016)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  38. Moudgalya, K.M.: Pedagogical and Organisational Issues in the Campaign for IT Literacy Through Spoken Tutorials. Presented at the (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Oliveira, T., Morgado, L.: Aprendizagem Colaborativa nos Fóruns online - Estudo de Caso no Ensino Superior. In: Conferência online de Informática Educacional. Universidade Aberta, Lisboa (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references


As an epilogue, we would like to thank the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) and the Centre for Research “Didactics and Technology in the Training of Trainers (CIDTFF) for the financial support granted in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fábio Freitas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Freitas, F., Ribeiro, J., Brandão, C., de Souza, F.N., Costa, A.P., Reis, L.P. (2018). In Case of Doubt See the Manual: A Comparative Analysis of (Self)Learning Packages Qualitative Research Software. In: Costa, A., Reis, L., Souza, F., Moreira, A. (eds) Computer Supported Qualitative Research. ISQR 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 621. Springer, Cham.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61120-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61121-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)