In Case of Doubt See the Manual: A Comparative Analysis of (Self)Learning Packages Qualitative Research Software

  • Fábio FreitasEmail author
  • Jaime Ribeiro
  • Catarina Brandão
  • Francislê Neri de Souza
  • António Pedro Costa
  • Luís Paulo Reis
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 621)


One of the first precautions that a consumer/user has when acquiring a new product is related to how to use it. In this context, the user manuals can be assumed as one of the main communication channels between the companies that develop the products and the user. Regarding the use of software packages, literature indicates that one of the decisive factors for user’s dissatisfaction is related to the difficulty in learning how to work with a software. In this context, Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS) enterprises are increasingly looking to develop features that can decrease user’s learning curve of their tools. In this way, this chapter illustrates a comparison of user support features, such as: support and typology of the User Manual; Training; Tutorials; Forums; Frequently asked questions (FAQ’s); Workshops. Through a systematic exploration of the native sites guided by a dedicated checklist, it was sought to identify the singularities of the resources to support (self)learning of the different software packages. In order to systematize the offers that each user can find, enabling him/her to choose the package that provides the solutions that best respond to his/her learning style. It was concluded that among the different software packages there are no noteworthy disparities, only in two packages analysed there were shortcomings in the offer of formative and autonomous learning.


Qualitative analysis software User guide Self-learning NVivo Atlas.ti Dedoose webQDA MAXQDA QDA Miner 



As an epilogue, we would like to thank the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) and the Centre for Research “Didactics and Technology in the Training of Trainers (CIDTFF) for the financial support granted in this study.


  1. 1.
    Costa, A.P., De Souza, F.N., Reis, L.P.: Necessitamos realmente de metodologias qualitativas na investigação em educação? Rev. Lusófona Educ. 29, 27–30 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baugh, J., Hallcom, A.S., Harris, M.E.: Computer assisted qualitative data analysis software: a practical perspective for applied research. Rev. del Inst. Int. Costos. enero/juni (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pinho, I., Rodrigues, E., de Souza, F.N. Lopes, G.: Determinantes na Adoção e Recomendação de Software de Investigação Qualitativa: Estudo Exploratório. Internet Latent Corpus J. 4 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Einspänner, J., Dang-Anh, M., Thimm, C.: Computer-assisted content analysis of Twitter data. In: Weller, K., Bruns, A., Burgess, J., Mahrt, M., Puschmann, C. (eds.) Twitter and Society, p. 435. Peter Lang Publishing, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eranki, K.L.N., Moudgalya, K.M.: Comparing the effectiveness of self-learning java workshops with traditional classrooms. Educ. Technol. Soc. 19, 59–74 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kolb, A.Y., Kolb, D.A.: The Kolb Learning Style Inventory—Version 3.1 2005 Technical Specifications (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Inal, Y., Güner, H.: Ensuring success in a large scale software project: an examination of the learning styles and characteristics of the potential end users. Gazi Univ. J. Sci. 4, 535–540 (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pashler, H., Mcdaniel, M., Rohrer, D., Bjork, R.: Learning styles concepts and evidence. Psychol. Sci. Public Interes. 9, 105–119 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Silver, C., Rivers, C.: The CAQDAS Postgraduate Learning Model: an interplay between methodological awareness, analytic adeptness and technological proficiency. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 19, 593–609 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Silver, C., Woolf, N.H.: From guided-instruction to facilitation of learning: the development of Five-Level QDA as a CAQDAS pedagogy that explicates the practices of expert users. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 18, 527–543 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    di Gregorio, S.: Is qualitative software really comparable? Reflections on “the Experiment”: an “Expert” view. Forum Qual. Soc. Res. 12 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reis, L.P., Costa, A.P., de Souza, F.N.: A survey on computer assisted qualitative data analysis software. In: 2016 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), pp. 1–6. AISTI, Gran Canaria (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bazeley, P., Jackson, K.: Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo. Sage Publications, London (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    QSR software: Discover the NVivo SuiteGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Atlas.ti: ATLAS.ti: Quality Software Developed in Germany.
  16. 16.
    Walter, S.A., Bach, T.M.: Adeus Papel, Marca-Textos, Tesoura e Cola: Inivando o Processo de Análise de Conteúdo por meio do Atlas.ti. Adm. Ensino e Pesqui. 16, 275 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jakub NiedbalskiŚlęzak, I.: Computer assisted qualitative data analysis software. Using the NVivo and Atlas.ti in the research projects based on the methodology of grounded theory. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brito, M.J.M., da Silva Caram, C., Montenegro, L.C., Rezende, L.C., Rennó, H.M.S., Ramos, F.R.S.: Potentialities of Atlas.ti for data analysis in qualitative research in nursing. In: Costa, A.P., Reis, L.P., Neri de Sousa, F., Moreira, A., Lamas, D. (eds.) Computer Supported Qualitative Research, pp. 75–84. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Talanquer, V.: Using qualitative analysis software to facilitate qualitative data analysis. In: Bunce, D.M., Cole, R.S. (eds.) Tools of Chemistry Education Research, pp. 83–95. American Chemical Society, Washington (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    de Souza, D.N., Costa, A.P., Neri de Sousa, F.: Desafio e Inovação do Estudo de Caso com Apoio das Tecnologias. In: Neri de Souza, F., Neri de Souza, D., Costa, A.P. (eds.) Investigação Qualitativa: Inovação, Dilemas e Desafios. Ludomedia, Oliveira de Azeméis (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
    Provalis Research: Text Analysis Tools.
  29. 29.
    Lewis, R.B., Maas, S.M.: QDA Miner 2.0: mixed-model qualitative data analysis software. Field Meth. 19, 87–108 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Derobertmasure, A., Robertson, J.E.: Data analysis in the context of teacher training: code sequence analysis using QDA Miner®. Qual. Quant. 48, 2255–2276 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Provalis Research: Qualitative Data Analysis Software.
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
    Neri de Souza, F., Almeida, P.A.: Investigação em Educação em Ciência baseada em dados provenientes da internet. In: XIII Encontro Nacional De Educação Em Ciências. Escola Superior de Educação, Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco, Castelo Branco (2009)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hewson, C., Yule, P., Laurent, D., Vogel, C.: Internet Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social and Behavioural Sciences. Sage Publications, London (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Freitas, F., Neri de Souza, F., Costa, A.P.: O Manual de Utilizador de um Software de Análise Qualitativa: as perceções dos utilizadores do webQDA. Rev. lbérica Sist. Tecnol. Informação 19, 107–117 (2016)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Silver, C., Rivers, C.: The CAQDAS Postgraduate Learning Model: an interplay between methodological awareness, analytic adeptness and technological proficiency. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 19, 593–609 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Moudgalya, K.M.: Pedagogical and Organisational Issues in the Campaign for IT Literacy Through Spoken Tutorials. Presented at the (2014)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Oliveira, T., Morgado, L.: Aprendizagem Colaborativa nos Fóruns online - Estudo de Caso no Ensino Superior. In: Conferência online de Informática Educacional. Universidade Aberta, Lisboa (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fábio Freitas
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jaime Ribeiro
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Catarina Brandão
    • 5
  • Francislê Neri de Souza
    • 1
  • António Pedro Costa
    • 1
  • Luís Paulo Reis
    • 6
    • 7
  1. 1.Research Centre in Didactics and Technology in the Training of Trainers (CIDTFF)University of AveiroAveiroPortugal
  2. 2.School of Health SciencesPolytechnic of LeiriaLeiriaPortugal
  3. 3.Health Research Unit (UIS)Polytechnic of LeiriaLeiriaPortugal
  4. 4.Inclusion and Accessibility in Action Research UnitPolytechnic of LeiriaLeiriaPortugal
  5. 5.Faculty of Psychology and Educational SciencesUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  6. 6.Information Systems DepartmentUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal
  7. 7.Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science Lab (LIACC)PortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations