Exploring Gender Stereotypes Using Qualitative-Quantitative Methodological Integration

  • Carmen Delgado ÁlvarezEmail author
  • Andrés Sánchez-PradaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 621)


This paper presents the research possibilities of the integration of qualitative and quantitative methodologies to explore gender stereotypes underlying the professional practice of psychology. The self-report technique, used as a research tool for stereotypes, has shown deficiencies in the control of the effect of social desirability on responses. This research accessed through qualitative methodology the discursive forms used by the study population to express covert gender stereotypes in socially acceptable formulations. From the Discussion Group with Psychology students, textual statements concealing these stereotypes were taken to transform them into items of a quantitative scale to assess large samples. The results were analyzed qualitatively by and with participants in the study. The methodological integration was an adequate strategy to access socially shared meanings, both in the design of instruments and in the explanation of the phenomena investigated.


Qualitative-quantitative methodological integration Gender stereotypes Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) Gender bias Psychological judges 


  1. 1.
    Deaux, K., Kite, M.E.: Thinking about gender. In: Hess, B., Ferree, M. (eds.) Analyzing Gender: A Handbook of Social Science Research, pp. 92–117. Sage, Newbury Park (1987)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deaux, K., Lewis, L.L.: Structure of gender stereotypes: interrelationships among components and gender label. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46(5), 991–1004 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eagly, A.H., Beall, A., Sternberg, R.S.: The Psychology of Gender. Guilford Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eagly, A.H.: Science and politics: a reconsideration. In: Ryan, M.K., Branscombe, N.R. (eds.) Sage Handbook of Gender and Psychology, pp. 11–28. Sage, London (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Broverman, I.K., Broverman, D.M., Clarkson, F.E., Rosenkrantz, P.S., Vogel, S.R.: Sex-role stereotypes and clinical judgments of mental health. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 34(1), 1–7 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    AERA, NCME, APA: Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1975)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosenberg, M., Hovland, C.: Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Components of Attitudes. Yale University Press, New Haven (1960)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferrer, V., Bosch, E.: Introduciendo la perspectiva de género en la investigación psicológica sobre violencia de género. Anales Psicol. 21(1), 1–10 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ferrer, V., Bosch, E., Ramis, M.C., Navarro, C.: Las creencias y actitudes sobre la violencia contra las mujeres en la pareja. Anales Psicol. 22(2), 251–259 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kahneman, D.: Pensar Rápido, Pensar Despacio, 3rd edn. Penguin Random House, Barcelona (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gardner, R.A.: The Parental Alienation Syndrome: A Guide for Mental Health and Legal Professionals. Creative Therapeutics, Cresskill (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bernet, W.: Parental alienation disorder and DSM-V. Am. J. Fam. Ther. 36(5), 349–366 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bernet, W., von Boch-Galhau, W., Baker, A., Morrison, S.L.: Parental alienation, DSM-V and ICD-11. Am. J. Fam. Ther. 38(2), 76–187 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Delgado, C.: Violencia contra las mujeres y discurso pseudocientífico. El caso del SAP. In: Fernández, O. (coord.) Mujeres en riesgo de exclusión social y violencia de género, pp. 161–170. McGraw Hill, Madrid (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Walker, L.E., Shapiro, D.: Parental alienation disorder: why label children with a mental diagnosis? J. Child Custody 7, 266–286 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vaccaro, S., Barea, C.: Otra forma de Violencia de Género: el pretendido Síndrome de Alienación Parental. Desclée De Brouwer, Bilbao (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Delgado, C.: Viajando a Ítaca por mares cuantitativos. Manual de ruta para investigar en grado y posgrado. Amarú, Salamanca (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gurdián, A.: El paradigma cualitativo en la investigación socio-educativa. Editorial de la Universidad de Costa Rica - CECC- AECI, San José (Costa Rica) (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sánchez-Gómez, M.C.: La dicotomía cualitativo-cuantitativo: posibilidades de integración y diseños mixtos. Campo Abierto: Revista de Educación, pp. 11–30 (2015). Monographic volumeGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martín-Cilleros, M.V., Sánchez-Gómez, M.C.: Análisis cualitativo de tópicos vinculados a la calidad de vida en personas con discapacidad. Ciencia & Saude Coletiva 21, 2365–2374 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sánchez-Gómez, M.C., Delgado, C., Santos, C.: El proceso de la investigación cualitativa. Manual de procedimiento. Edintras, Valladolid (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Anguera, M.T., Camerino, O., Castañer, M., Sánchez-Algarra, P.: Mixed methods en la investigación de la actividad física y el deporte. Revista de Psicología del Deporte 23(1), 123–130 (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Natasi, B., Hitchcock, J., Brown, L.: An inclusive framework for conceptualizing mixed methods design typologies: moving toward fully integrated synergistic research models. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds.) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, pp. 305–338. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Martín Baró, I.: Hacia una psicología de la liberación. Revista Electrónica de Intervención Psicosocial y Psicología Comunitaria 2(1), 7–14 (2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Van Dijk, T.A.: Ideología. Gedisa, Barcelona (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pontifical University of SalamancaSalamancaSpain

Personalised recommendations