Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Philosophy, Public Policy, and Transnational Law ((PPPTL))

  • 389 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter of the book, Worldviews and the WTO’, the two basic concepts of risk and their respective epistemological and philosophical origins are discussed. The first risk concept is rooted in the individualistic and rational philosophy of the Enlightenment and early Capitalism. The second risk concept stems from anti-modernist movements associated with romanticism and the alienation of man from nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bannock, Graham, Baxter, Ron, and Davis, Evan. “Dictionary of Economics”. Profile Books, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich. “Die Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne”. Suhrkamp Verlag, 1996 (1st edition 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich. “World Risk Society”. Polity Press in association with Blackwell Publishers, 2005 (first published 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Peter L. “Against the Gods. The Remarkable Story of Risk”. John Wiley & Sons, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhns, Annette. “Ein Traum von Atlantis”. SPIEGEL GESCHICHTE, vol. 5, 2010, 79–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ely, Adrian, Stierling, Andy, Dreyer, Marion, Renn, Ortwin, Vos, Ellen and Wendler, Frank. “The Need for Change”. Published in Marion Dreyer and Ortwin Renn (eds.), Food Safety Governance. Integrating Science, Precaution and Public Involvement. Springer-Verlag, 2009, 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner Bryan A. (ed.). “Black’s Law Dictionary”, Thomson Reuters, 2009, 9th edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, Philip Babcock (ed.). “Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged”. Könemann Verlagsgesellschaft, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiser, Klaus. “Geschichte Istanbuls. Von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart”. Verlag C.H. Beck, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas. “Risk: A Sociological Theory”. Translated from the German original version by Rhodes Barrett. Walter de Gruyter, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, Ernest. “Introduction” to Karl Marx, Capital. A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. 1. Translated by Ben Fowkes. Penguin Books, 1990, 11–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandl, Christoph and Lathrop, John. “Comparing Risk Assessments for Liquefied Energy Gas Terminals – Some Results”. Published in Howard C. Kunreuther and Eryl V. Ley (eds.), The Risk Analysis Controversy. An Institutional Perspective. Proceedings of a Summer Study on Decision Processes and Institutional Aspects of Risk held at IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria, 22–26 June, 1981.Springer-Verlag, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pat O’Malley, “Risk, Uncertainty and Government”. Routledge-Cavendish, 2006 (1st edition 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Osman, Nabil (ed.). “Kleines Lexikon deutscher Wörter arabischer Herkunft”. Verlag C.H. Beck, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piron, Sylvain. “L’apparition du resicum en Méditerranée occidentale, XIIe - XIIIe siècles”. Published in Emmanuelle Collas-Heddeland et. al. (eds.), Pour une Histoire culturelle du risque. Genèse, évolution, actualité du concept dans les sociétés occidentales. Editions Histoire et Anthropologie, 2004, 59–76. Accessed October 25, 2010. http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/03/76/66/PDF/apparition_du_resicum.pdf.

  • Pradier, Pierre-Charles. “La notion de risqué en économie”. Éditions La Découverte, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, Steve. “Learning from the Blind Men and the Elephant, or Seeing Things Whole in Risk Management”. Published in Vincent T. Covello, Lester B. Lave, Alan Moghissi and V.R.R. Uppuluri (eds.), Uncertainty in Risk Assessment, Risk Management, and Decision Making. NY: Plenum Press, 1987, 207–212.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burkard, M. (2018). Two Concepts of Risk. In: Conflicting Philosophies and International Trade Law. Philosophy, Public Policy, and Transnational Law. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61067-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics