The WASCAL-Tool: Prediction of Staffing for Train Dispatching as Part of the Design Process of Track Yards

  • Melcher Zeilstra
  • Alfred van Wincoop
  • Jouke Rypkema
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 726)

Abstract

The Dutch infrastructure manager builds new track yards or enlarges existing track yards to facilitate service and maintenance of new rolling stock to be commissioned next few years. One of the design issues is the choice for a certain level of automation. A high level of automation requires higher investment in technology, but will result in lower mental workload of a train dispatcher and therefore require lower staffing and lower operational costs for the train dispatching process; a low level of automation result in higher mental workload of train dispatchers and has higher operational costs for train dispatching due to higher staffing. Or this design issue the WASCAL-tool was developed. The tool calculates staffing for train dispatching for all levels of automation, currently in operation in the Netherlands. The tool is validated based on observations of train service on several track yards. The output of the tool in terms of staffing is reliable enough for the choices to be made during the design process of a new track yard.

Keywords

Staffing Workload Train dispatching Prediction Design Track yards Level of automation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the train dispatchers of the traffic management control room of the city of Groningen and the city of Amersfoort for their support and cooperation during the validation of the tool. We also thank all the other train dispatchers for other track yards in The Netherlands who were involved in the development of the tool.

References

  1. 1.
    Bruijn, D.W., de, Zeilstra, M.P.: Development of Task WeighingTM, report 2937-b, version 1.0, February 2007 (Intergo, Utrecht, confidential). In Dutch: Bruijn, D.W., de, Zeilstra, M.P.: OntwikkelingTaakWegingTM, rapport 2937-b, versie 1.0, februari 2007 (Intergo, Utrecht, vertrouwelijk) (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chipman, S.F., Schraagen, J.M., Shalin, V.L.: Introduction to cognitive task analysis. In: Schraagen, J.M., Chipman, S.F., Shalin, V.L. (eds.) Cognitive Task Analysis, pp. 3–23. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Handbook train dispatcher, version May 2016, ProRail Traffic Management Department, reference EDMS#3884910; in Dutch: Handboektreindienstleider (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ISO 10075: 1991 (E), Ergonomic principles related to mental workload - General terms and definitions (1991)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lenior, T.M.J., Gobel, M.P.: Predicting mental workload for train traffic control tasks. In: Seppala, P., Luopajarvi, T., Nygard, C.H., Mattila, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association From Experience to Innovation - IEA 1997, pp. 358–360. Finnish Institut, London (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Manual LOA-online (all levels of automation), ProRail Traffic Management Department, in Dutch: Handleiding LOA-online, beknopte handleiding voor het aanvragen/beoordelen van lokale orderaanvragen; Handleiding LOA Online versie4 | 20 juli 2016 | definitief (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Manual EBI/LWA (medium level of automation), ProRailAssetmanagement, versie 1.0, June 1st, 2014, GVS60232-21, in Dutch: Gebruiksvoorschrift EBIScreen 300 Treindienstleider (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Manual TRON-web based application (low level of automation), ProRail Traffic Management Department, version 4.3a, March 1st, 2016, in Dutch: TRON-webapplicatie - Functionaliteiten TREINDIENSTLEIDER - Versie 4.3A (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Manual control of switches and signals with assistance of the system Process Control Routes, ProRail ICT Services, version 1.0, December 1st, 2015, GVS00102, in Dutch: Gebruiksvoorschriftvoor de bediening van wissel- en seininrichtingen met behulp van ProcesleidingRijwegen (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pickup, L., Wilson, J.R., Sharples, S., Norris, B., Clarke, T., Young, M.S.: Fundamental examination of mental workload in the rail industry. Theoret. Issues Ergon. Sci. 6(6), 463–482 (2005). doi: 10.1080/14639220500078021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pickup, L., Wilson, J.R., Nichols, S., Smith, S.: A conceptual framework of mental workload and the development of a self- reporting integrated workload scale for railway signallers. In: Wilson, J.R., Norris, B., Clarke, T., Mills, A. (eds.) Rail Human Factors: Supporting the Integrated Railway, pp. 319–329. Ashgate, Aldershot (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stanton, N.A.: Hierarchical task analysis: developments, applications, and extensions. Appl. Ergon. 37, 55–79 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Time occupancy study, train dispatching NCBG (low level of automation), Accent OrganisatieAdvies B.V., commissioned by ProRail Traffic Management and NedTrain, December 16th, 2009, confidentaial, in Dutch: NCBG Onderzoektijdstudie in opdracht van ProRail en NedTrain (vertrouwelijk) (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Young, M.S., Brookhuis, K.A., Wickens, C.D., Hancock, P.A.: State of science: mental workload in ergonomics. Ergonomics 58(1), 1–17 (2017). doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.956151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wickens, C.D.: Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theret. Issues Ergon. Sci. 3, 159–177 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilms, M.S., Zeilstra, M.P., Subjective mental workload of Dutch train dispatchers: validation of IWS in a practical setting. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Rail Human Factors, London, pp. 633–640, London (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Working methods train dispatching (high level of automation) version May 2016, ProRail Traffic Management Department, in Dutch: WerkwijzeTreindienstleider (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Working methods train dispatching NCBG (medium and low level of automation), version May 2016, ProRail Traffic Management Department, in Dutch: WerkwijzeTreindienstleider NCBG (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zeilstra, M.P, Bruijn, D.W., de Weide, R., van der, Development and implementation of a predictive tool for optimizing workload of train dispatchers. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Rail Human Factors, Lille (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melcher Zeilstra
    • 1
  • Alfred van Wincoop
    • 1
  • Jouke Rypkema
    • 1
  1. 1.INTERGO Human Factors and ErgonomicsUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations