Advertisement

Workload, Fatigue and Performance in the Rail Industry

  • Andrew P. Smith
  • Hugo N. Smith
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 726)

Abstract

Recent research has addressed the topic of workload in the rail industry. Much of this has been concerned with developing measures for use by signallers and there has been less research about the workload of passenger rail staff. The present studies addressed this issue using single item measures of workload, effort, fatigue and performance. Results from two diary studies with conductors/guards and maintenance engineers showed that high workload was associated with increased fatigue. Fatigue was associated with increased risk of incidents and slower reaction time. In the third study, results from a large scale survey showed both that high demands increased fatigue and demands were associated with perceptions of reduced performance. Overall, these results confirm the importance of workload for operational efficiency and show that the use of single item measures makes further study in real-life settings acceptable.

Keywords

Workload Job demands Fatigue Performance Rail industry 

References

  1. 1.
    Norris, B.J., Wilson, J.R., Clarke, T., Mills, A.: Rail Human Factors: Supporting the Integrated Railway. Ashgate, London (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Krehl, C., Balfe, C.: Cognitive workload analysis in rail signalling environments. Cognit. Technol. Work 16, 359–371 (2014). doi: 10.1007/s10111-013-0266-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wilson, J.R., Cordiner, L.A., Nichols, S.C., Norton, L., Bristol, N., Clarke, T., Roberts, S.: On the right track: systematic implementation of ergonomics in railway network control. Cognit. Technol. Work 3, 238–252 (2001). doi: 10.1007/s10111-001-8005-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moray, N.: Mental Workload Its Theory and Measurement. Plenum Press, New York (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moray, N.: Subjective mental workload. Hum. Factors 24, 25–40 (1982). doi: 10.1177/001872088202400104 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wickens, C.D.: Engineering psychology and human performance, 2nd edn. HarperCollins Publishers Inc, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pickup, L., Wilson, J., Sharples, S., Norris, B., Clarke, T., Youngs, M.S.: Fundamental examination of mental workload in the rail industry. Theoret. Issues Ergon. Sci. 6(6), 463–482 (2005). doi: 10.1080/14639220500078021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of experimental and theoretical research. In: Hancock, A., Meshkati, N. (eds.) PHuman Mental Workload 1988, pp. 139–178. North Holland, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kirwan, B., Ainsworth, L.K.: A Guide to Task Analysis. Taylor & Francis, London (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hancock, P.A., Caird, J.K.: Experimental evaluation of a model of mental work load. Hum. Factors 35, 413–429 (1993). doi: 10.1177/001872089303500303 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kahneman, D.: Attention and Effort. Prentice Hall inc, New Jersey (1973)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pickup, L., Wilson, J.: Workload Assessment Tools. Report IOE/RAIL/03/02, The University of Nottingham (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    RSSB T147: Mental workload assessment for train drivers (2005). https://www.rssb.co.uk/research-development-and-innovation/research-and…/t147
  14. 14.
    Cain, B.: A review of the mental workload literature. In: Defence Research and Development Canada Toronto, Human System Integration Section, Part II, vol. 4, pp. 1–34 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Young, M.S., Brookhuis, K.A., Wickens, C.D., Hancock, P.A.: State of science: mental workload in ergonomics. Ergonomics 58(1), 1–17 (2015). doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.956151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eggemeier, F.T.: Properties of workload assessment techniques. Adv. Psychol. 52, 41–62 (1988). doi: 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62382-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Williams, G.M., Smith, A.P.: A holistic approach to stress and well-being. Part 6: The Wellbeing Process Questionnaire (WPQ Short Form). Occupational Health (At Work), 9/1. 29–31 (2012). ISSN 1744-2265Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Williams, G.M., Smith, A.P.: Using single-item measures to examine the relationships between work, personality, and well-being in the workplace. Psychol. Special Ed. Positive Psychol. 7, 753–767 (2016). doi: 10.4236/psych.2016.76078 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smith, A.P., Smith, H.N.: An international survey of the wellbeing of employees in the business process outsourcing industry. Psychology 8, 160–167 (2017). doi: 10.4236/psych.2017.81010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mark, G.M., Smith, A.P.: Stress models: a review and suggested new direction. In: Houdmont, J., Leka, S. (eds.) Occupational Health Psychology: European Perspectives on Research, Education and Practice. EA-OHP Series, vol. 3, pp. 111–144. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spencer, M.B., Robertson, K.A., Folkard, S.: The development of a fatigue/risk index for shiftworkers. Research Report 446. Sudbury: HSE Books (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Broadbent, D.E.: Is a fatigue test possible? Ergonomics 22(12), 1277–1290 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smith A.P.: From the brain to the workplace: research on cognitive fatigue in the laboratory and onboard ship. In: Ackerman, P. (eds.) Cognitive Fatigue: Multidisciplinary perspectives on current research and future applications. American Psychological Association, chap. 14, pp. 291–305. ISBN: 978-1-4338-0839-5. 2011Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Parkes, K.R.: The effects of objective workload on cognitive performance in a field setting: a two-period cross-over study. Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 9(7), 153–171 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fan, J., Smith, A.P.: The impact of workload and fatigue on performance. In: Longo, L., Leva, M.C. (eds.) Human Mental Workload: Models and Applications, H-WORKLOAD 2017. CCIS, vol. 726, pp. 1–16. Springer International Publishing (2017). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-61061-0_6

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Occupational and Health Psychology, School of PsychologyCardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations