Skip to main content

Student Use of SFL Resources on Fantasy, Canonical, and Non-fiction Texts: Critical Literacy in the High School ELA Classroom

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bilingual Learners and Social Equity

Part of the book series: Educational Linguistics ((EDUL,volume 33))

Abstract

This chapter explores how Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) in an upper high school English Language Arts classroom (ELA) supported students in recognizing how language patterns in texts positions people to think and behave in particular ways. SFL resources also deepened students’ language awareness as well as their writing on high stakes tests. The chapter provides educators with an example of how to use the resources of SFL with students to recognize and analyze critical issues in narrative, drama, and nonfiction texts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aronowitz, S. (1998). Introduction. In P. Freire, Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civil courage (Patrick Clarke, Trans.) (pp. 1–20). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1963). The process of education. New York: Alfred Knopf and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1968). Towards a theory of instruction. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, F., & Macken-Horarik, M. (2007). Building verticality on subject English. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Language knowledge and pedagogy: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives (pp. 156–183). New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, A. (1999). The ethnographic self: Fieldwork and the representation of identity. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • College Board. (2008). AP English language and composition practice exam. Retrieved from www.collegeboard.com Accessed 22 Sept 2011.

  • Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: National Governor’s Association. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ Accessed 22 Sept 2011.

  • Cranny-Francis, A. (1996). Technology and/or weapon: The discipline of reading in the secondary English classroom. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 172–190). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Essex: Longman Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Introduction. In N. Fairclough (Ed.), Critical language awareness (pp. 1–29). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. New York: Trans-Atlantic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2010). Disciplinary literacies across content areas: Supporting secondary reading through functional language analysis. J Adolesc Adult Lit, 53(7), 597–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1986). Pedagogy of the oppressed (Myra Bergan Ramos, Trans.). New York: Continuum. (Original work published in 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold (Original work published in 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, R. (2008). Systemic functional linguistics and the teaching of literature in urban school classrooms. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, R. (2013). Literacy intertextuality in genre-based pedagogies: Building lexical cohesion in fifth-grade L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(2), 125–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, R., & Simmons, A. M. (2014). Systemic functional linguistics: Resource to promote critical literacy practices in K-12 classroom contexts. In L. C. de Oliveira & J. Iddings (Eds.), Genre pedagogy across the curriculum: Theory and application in U.S. classrooms and contexts (pp. 75–91). Bristol: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, S., Love, K., & Droga, L. (2011). Working grammar. Sydney: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. (1977). Foundations of sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. London: Tavistock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanic, R., & Simpson, J. (1992). Who’s who in academic writing? In N. Fairclough (Ed.), Critical language awareness (pp. 141–173). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janks, H., & Ivanic, R. (1992). CLA and emancipatory discourse. In N. Fairclough (Ed.), Critical language awareness (pp. 305–331). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, P., & Watkins, M. (2005). Genre, text, and grammar: Technologies for teaching and assessing writing. Sydney: New South Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, K. (2006). Appraisal in online discussions of literary texts. Text &Talk, 26(2), 217–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macken-Horarik, M. (1998). Exploring the requirements of critical school literacy. In F. Christie & R. Mission (Eds.), Literacy and schooling (pp. 74–103). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macken-Horarik, M. (2003). Appraisal and the special instructiveness of narrative. Text, 23(2), 285–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macken-Horarik, M. (2006). Knowledge through “know how”: Systemic functional grammatics and the symbolic reading. Engl Teach Pract Crit, 5(1), 102–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macken-Horarik, M. (2009). Navigational metalanguages for new territory in English: The potential of grammatics. Engl Teach Pract Crit, 8(3), 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. R. (2000). Close reading: Functional linguistics as a tool for critical discourse analysis. In L. Unsworth (Ed.), Researching language in schools and communities: Functional linguistic perspectives (pp. 275–302). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2004). Qualitative researching. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostry, E. (2003). Accepting Mudbloods: The ambivalent social vision of J.K. Rowling’s fairy tales. In G. L. Anatol (Ed.), Reading harry potter: Critical essays (pp. 89–102). Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothery, J., & Stenglin, M. (1994). Spine-chilling stories: A unit of work for junior secondary English. Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothery, J., & Stenglin, M. (2000). Interpreting literature: The role of appraisal. In L. Unsworth (Ed.), Researching language in schools and communities: Functional linguistic perspectives (pp. 222–243). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowling, J. K. (1997). Harry potter and the Sorcerer’s stone. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleppegrell, M. J. (2011). Supporting disciplinary learning through language analysis: Developing historical literacy. In F. Christie & K. Maton (Eds.), Disciplinarity: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives (pp. 197–216). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleppegrell, M. J. (2013). The role of metalanguage in supporting academic language development. Language Learning, 63(Suppl 1), 153–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadd-Cary, M.A. (1854, March 25). Why establish this paper? The Provincial Freeman, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, W. (2002). Othello. In T. R. Arp & G. Johnson (Eds.), Perrine’s literature: Structure, sound, and sense (8th ed., pp. 1361–1461). New York: Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, A.M. (2012). A word in the hand: Supporting critical literacy through a discourse analysis of fantasy, canonical, and nonfiction texts. Dissertation, University of Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • The New York Times. (2009). Text: Obama’s speech in Cairo. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/04/us/politics/04obama.text.html?pagewanted=all&moc.semityn.www. Accessed 22 Sept 2011.

  • Wennerstrom, A. (2003). Discourse analysis in the language classroom. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amber M. Simmons .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simmons, A.M. (2018). Student Use of SFL Resources on Fantasy, Canonical, and Non-fiction Texts: Critical Literacy in the High School ELA Classroom. In: Harman, R. (eds) Bilingual Learners and Social Equity. Educational Linguistics, vol 33. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60953-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60953-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60951-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60953-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics