Patient Specific Virtual and Physical Simulation Platform for Surgical Robot Movability Evaluation in Single-Access Robot-Assisted Minimally-Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery
Conference paper
First Online:
- 1 Mentions
- 1.9k Downloads
Abstract
Recently, minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery (MICS) has grown in popularity thanks to its advantages over conventional surgery and advancements in surgical robotics.
This paper presents a patient-specific virtual surgical simulator for the movability evaluation of single-port MICS robots. This simulator can be used for both the pre-operative planning to rehearse the case before the surgery, and to test the robot in the early stage of development before physical prototypes are built.
A physical simulator is also proposed to test the robot prototype in a tangible environment. Synthetic replicas of the patient organs are able to replicate the mechanical behaviors of biological tissues, allowing the simulation of the physical interactions robot-anatomy.
The preliminary tests of the virtual simulator showed good performance for both the visual and physics processes.
After reviewing the physical simulator, a surgeon provided a positive evaluation of the organ replicas in terms of geometry and mechanical behaviors.
Keywords
Virtual reality Unity game engine Computer-assisted surgery Minimally-invasive surgery Cardiothoracic surgery Robotic surgery Surgical simulationNotes
Acknowledgments
The research leading to these results has been supported by the scientific project ValveTech (“Realizzazione di una Valvola Aortica Polimerica di Nuova Concezione ed Impiantabile Tramite Piattaforma Robotica con Tecniche di Chirurgia Mininvasiva” 2016–2018) funded by the Tuscany Region (Italy) through the call FAS SALUTE 2014.
References
- 1.Baccarin, L.S., Casarin, R.C.V., Lopes-da Silva, J.V., Passeri, L.A.: Analysis of mandibular test specimens used to assess a bone fixation system. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Reconstr. 8(03), 171–178 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Bhatt, A.G., Steinberg, J.S.: Robotic-assisted left ventricular lead placement. Card. Electrophysiol. Clin. 7(4), 649–659 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Bush, B., Nifong, L.W., Alwair, H., Chitwood Jr., W.R.: Video-atlas on robotically assisted mitral valve surgery. Ann. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2(6), 846–848 (2013)Google Scholar
- 4.Carbone, M., Condino, S., Mattei, L., Forte, P., Ferrari, V., Mosca, F.: Anthropomorphic ultrasound elastography phantoms: Characterization of silicone materials to build breast elastography phantoms. In: 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 492–494. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
- 5.Celi, S., Berti, S.: In-vivo segmentation and quantification of coronary lesions by optical coherence tomography images for a lesion type definition and stenosis grading. Med. Image Anal. 18(7), 1157–1168 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Condino, S., Carbone, M., Ferrari, V., Faggioni, L., Peri, A., Ferrari, M., Mosca, F.: How to build patient-specific synthetic abdominal anatomies. An innovative approach from physical toward hybrid surgical simulators. Int. J. Med. Robot. 7(2), 202–213 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.De Luca, V., Meo, A., Mongelli, A., Vecchio, P., De Paolis, L.T.: Development of a virtual simulator for microanastomosis: new opportunities and challenges. In: Paolis, L.T., Mongelli, A. (eds.) AVR 2016. LNCS, vol. 9769, pp. 65–81. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-40651-0_6 Google Scholar
- 8.Degani, A., Choset, H., Wolf, A., Zenati, M.A.: Highly articulated robotic probe for minimally invasive surgery. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2006, pp. 4167–4172. IEEE (2006)Google Scholar
- 9.Folliguet, T.A., Dibie, A., Philippe, F., Larrazet, F., Slama, M.S., Laborde, F.: Robotically-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting. Cardiol. Res. Pract. 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
- 10.Folliguet, T.A., Laborde, F.: Robotic aortic valve replacement. In: Chitwood Jr., W.R. (ed.) Atlas of Robotic Cardiac Surgery, pp. 265–269. Springer, London (2014)Google Scholar
- 11.Gong, W., Cai, J., Wang, Z., Chen, A., Ye, X., Li, H., Zhao, Q.: Robot-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting improves short-term outcomes compared with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. J. Thorac. Dis. 8(3), 459–468 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Iribarne, A., Easterwood, R., Chan, E.Y., Yang, J., Soni, L., Russo, M.J., Smith, C.R., Argenziano, M.: The golden age of minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery: current and future perspectives. Future Cardiol. 7(3), 333–346 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Moglia, A., Turini, G., Ferrari, V., Ferrari, M., Mosca, F.: Patient specific surgical simulator for the evaluation of the movability of bimanual robotic arms. Stud. Health Technol. Inf. 163, 379–385 (2011)Google Scholar
- 14.Neuzil, P., Cerny, S., Kralovec, S., Svanidze, O., Bohuslavek, J., Plasil, P., Jehlicka, P., Holy, F., Petru, J., Kuenzler, R., et al.: Single-site access robot-assisted epicardial mapping with a snake robot: preparation and first clinical experience. J. Robot. Surg. 7(2), 103–111 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Paci, A., Marcutti, S., Ricci, S., Casadio, M., Vercelli, G.V., Marchiolè, P., Cordone, M.: eBSim: development of a low-cost obstetric simulator. In: Paolis, L.T., Mongelli, A. (eds.) AVR 2016. LNCS, vol. 9769, pp. 101–110. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-40651-0_9 Google Scholar
- 16.Parchi, P., Condino, S., Carbone, M., Gesi, M., Ferrari, V., Ferrari, M., Lisanti, M.: Total hip replacement simulators with virtual planning and physical replica for surgical training and rehearsal. In: Proceedings of the 12th IASTED International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, BioMed 2016, pp. 97–101 (2016)Google Scholar
- 17.Parchi, P., Ferrari, V., Piolanti, N., Andreani, L., Condino, S., Evangelisti, G., Lisanti, M.: Computer tomography prototyping and virtual procedure simulation in difficult cases of hip replacement surgery. Surg. Technol. Int. 23, 228–234 (2013)Google Scholar
- 18.Poffo, R., Toschi, A.P., Pope, R.B., Celullare, A.L., Benício, A., Fischer, C.H., Vieira, M.L.C., Teruya, A., Hatanaka, D.M., Rusca, G.F., et al.: Robotic surgery in cardiology: a safe and effective procedure. Einstein (Sao Paulo) 11(3), 296–302 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Turini, G., Moglia, A., Ferrari, V., Ferrari, M., Mosca, F.: Patient-specific surgical simulator for the pre-operative planning of single-incision laparoscopic surgery with bimanual robots. Comput. Aided Surg. 17(3), 103–112 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Wutzler, A., Wolber, T., Haverkamp, W., Boldt, L.H.: Robotic ablation of atrialfibrillation. J. Vis. Exp. JoVE 99 (2015)Google Scholar
- 21.Xu, K., Zheng, X.: Configuration comparison for surgical robotic systems using a single access port and continuum mechanisms. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 3367–3374. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017