Generating the Pantheon’s Dome: Cultural Paradigms and Shape Grammars

Chapter

Abstract

The paper examines some of the possible ways to generate the coffered domes, where generative grammars are determined by different cultural paradigms. A method applied is the shape generation method, that uses shape grammars, which take shapes as primitive and have shape specific rules, as described by G. Stiny and J. Gips. The generation of the three dimensional shape consists in the definition of a language of two dimensional shapes, the selection of the shape in that language, a specification of a sphere mapping schema and the determination of a location and scale of the shape on the series of concentric spheres of a given size [1, 2]. This work shows that the essential differences between the Pantheon’s dome and some “Pantheon inspired” coffered domes are caused by applying different generative grammars, characterized by their cultures.

Keywords

Pantheon Shape grammar Generative design Stereographic projection Coffered dome 

References

  1. 1.
    Chase, S. C. (1993). The use of multiple representations to facilitate design interpretation. In Proceedings of ARECDAO’93, Barcelona (pp. 205–217).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gips, J., & Stiny, G. (1972). Shape grammars and the generative specifications of painting and sculpture. In The best computer papers of 1971 (pp. 125–135). Philadelphia: Auerbach Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Knight, T. W. (1998). Designing a shape grammar. In Artificial Intelligence in Design’98 (pp. 499–516). Springer.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stiny, G., & Mitchell, W. J. (1978). The palladian grammar. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 5(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stiny, G. (2011). What rule(s) should i use? Nexus Network Journal, 13(1), 15–47.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Soddu, C., & Colabella, E. (2008). Lumen in Splendore. In Proceedings of 7th international conference Aplimat. Bratislava: STU Bratislava.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bartoli, M. T. (1995). Scaenographia vitruviana: il disegno delle volte a lacunari tra rappresentazione e costruzione. In DISEGNARE IDEE IMMAGINI (pp. 51–62). Roma: Gangemi Editore S.p.A., n. 9/10.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bartoli, M. T. (1997). Le ragioni geometriche del segno architettonico. Firenze: Alinea Editrice s.r.l.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bartoli, M. T. (2010). Il cielo, la terra e le cupole a lacunari. In Mandelli, E. (Ed.), Disegnare il tempo e l’armonia. Il disegno di Architettura osservatorio nell’Universo, Proceedings of International Congress A.E.D. Firenze: Alinea Editrice s.r.l.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Valenti, G. M. (2009). A computing model for the Pantheon’s cupola; from the discrete to the continuous. The ideal continuous model. In G. Grabof, M. Heinzelmann, & M. Wafler (Eds.), The Pantheon in Rome. Bern Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science: Bern.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rondelet, G. (1832). Trattato teorico e pratico dell’arte di edificare, tomo II e III. Mantova.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ArchitectureUniversity of FerraraFerraraItaly

Personalised recommendations