Research of Nonlinear Architecture Morphology Based on Psychology Rules and Mathematical Orders

Chapter

Abstract

Technological development is to serve the needs of the human body and mind. Today’s digital technology has become a relatively perfect platform, it has built a new generative architecture form, with numerical simulation, biological information, natural morphology and mathematical rules. Furthermore, we want to know the suitability of such a strong impact on people’s physical and mental needs or aesthetic rules. This paper is trying to explain and solve this problem. First step, use examples to find out the morphological features of non-linear architecture which are different from the traditional architecture. Coming out four results: ambiguity of space, temporality of direction, uniqueness of position, and information of volume. Second step, according to the four results of argumentation, seek for solutions. The solutions are based on psychological rules and mathematical orders: setting a visual gravity point, using light to find the direction, invisible axis, and “blank-leaving” of scales, finally draw a conclusion. Hoping the research will provide theoretical guidance of parametric nonlinear architectural design in the future. The purpose is to avoid technological breakthroughs to bring psychological pressure and aesthetic missing.

Keywords

Nonlinear architecture Architecture morphology Psychology rules Mathematical orders 

References

  1. 1.
    Lin, J. (2000). Modeling foundation. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arnheim, R. (1998). Art and visual perception. Chengdu: Sichuan People Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, Z., & Chen, Y. (2006). Architecture morphology. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leach, N., & Yuan, F. (2011). Scripting the future. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu, Y. (2013). Research on contemporary architectural thought under Deleuze’s philosophy. Doctor Degree Thesis of Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang, M., & Liu, S. (2012). A study on the aesthetic characteristics of form diversity in contemporary western architectural symbols. Harbin: Urbanism and Architecture.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, Y., Fang, H. (2005). Human, measure scale and proportion. Finnish Master Architect Blomstedt and Pythagoras Harmony Tradition. Huazhong Architecture (Changsha)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tanca, M., Grossberg, S., & Pinna, B. (2009). Probing perceptual antinomies with the watercolor illusion and explaining how the brain resolves them, seeing and perceiving. Leiden.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liva, G. (2008). Section and projection: The cinematic experience of the conical sections in Antony McCall’s work. In: Descriptive geometry and digital representation: Memory and innovation. Milano.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ching, F. D. K. (2008). Architecture: Form space & order. Tianjin: Tianjin University Press.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    An, H., & Gao, X. (2013). Analysis on visual dynamic type of architectural form: Based on the visual perception theory of gestalt psychology., Architecture & Culture Beijing: World Book Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Caldas, L. (2008). Generation of energy efficient architecture solutions applying GENE_ARCH: An evolution-based generative design system. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 22, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ArchitectureHarbin Institute of Technology (HIT)HarbinChina

Personalised recommendations