The Interface Between the Generalists and Professionals: The Indian Experience

  • Bidyut Chakrabarty
Chapter

Abstract

Bureaucracy is one of the major pillars of civil administration regardless of the nature of the political system. Despite being Weberian in character in view of its colonial roots, bureaucracy in South Asia, particularly in India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, has undergone significant changes in the wake of economic liberalization and the processes of democratization. Conceptually speaking, bureaucracy is hardly the steel frame of the colonial era given the growing importance of instruments of external accountability; nonetheless, it cannot be said to have ceded its exclusionary nature presumably because of some well-entrenched characteristics which are associated with Weberian bureaucracy. The chapter thus makes two arguments: (1) the generalist characteristics of bureaucracy do not seem to be tenable given the growing complexities of governance in the light of the interplay between state, market and civil society; (2) suggestive of the interplay involving state, market and civil society, the chapter pursues the argument that professionals being suitably trained and engaged in specific activities remain critical to governance. In order to conceptually understand the interface between professionals and line bureaucrats at the higher echelon, the chapter focuses on three specific instruments of authority:
  • National Institution of Transforming India (NITI) Aayog.

  • Three major regulatory authorities (Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC).

  • District Planning Committees, which came into being after the promulgation of the 73rd Amendment Act in 1992.

The basic idea is that the mutual exchange of expertise of professionals and generalists is necessary to develop effective policy alternatives. This is where the modern post-colonial civil service, at national and local levels, is going, and rightly so. Modern governance is neither merely a technical act nor merely a Weberian making of rules. Governance is now a socio-cultural and technical act to realize certain well-defined societal and culture-specific ideological goals.

References

  1. Ali, T. (1985). The Nehrus and the Gandhis: An Indian Dynasty. London: Picador.Google Scholar
  2. Arora, R. K., & Goyal, R. (2001). Indian Public Administration: Institutions and Issues. New Delhi: Wishwa Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Caiden, G. (1994). Globalizing the Theory and Practice of Public Administration. In G.-Z. Jean-Claude & R. Khator (Eds.), Public Administration in the Global Village. West Port: Praeger.Google Scholar
  4. Das, S. K. (1998). Civil Service Reform and Structural Adjustment. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Government of India. (1959). Report of the Commission of Enquiry on Emoluments and Conditions of Service of Central Government Employees. New Delhi: Ministry of Finance.Google Scholar
  6. Government of India. (2008). Report of the Sixth Central Pay Commission. New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
  7. Government of India. (2015a). Cabinet Resolution of 1 January. The Gazette of India, Part 1 (6), 5.Google Scholar
  8. Government of India. (2015b). NITI Aayog: From planning to NITI: Transforming India’s Development Agenda. New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
  9. Jawaharlal Nehru Fund. (1999). Selected Works of Jawaharlal Nehru (Vol. 25 (second series)). New Delhi: Teen Murti.Google Scholar
  10. Khilnani, S. (1997). The Idea of India. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
  11. Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India.Google Scholar
  12. Potter, D. C. (1996). India’s Political Administrators: From ICS to IAS. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Singh, S. (2003). The Salary Structure of Higher Civil Servants in India – An Empirical Study of Fifth Pay Commission. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Mumbai.Google Scholar
  14. World Bank. (1989). PREM (Poverty Reduction and Economic Management): Notes on Public Sector. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bidyut Chakrabarty
    • 1
  1. 1.University of DelhiDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations