Advertisement

The Inclusivity Role of the Judiciary in Bangladesh

  • Ridwanul Hoque
Chapter

Abstract

The issue of inclusiveness with reference to the judiciary is somewhat tricky in the sense that, unlike in the case of parliament or the executive, an inclusive judiciary may not necessarily mean the formal inclusion of “others” in the decision-making process. Inclusive judicial governance, nevertheless, requires a judicial system that should be not only internally diverse or representative but also functionally inclusive, protecting the minorities or those who are marginalized or remain excluded in society. It also means the wider public’s access to the justice system. A society cannot be equal without equal access to justice. While a diverse judiciary is inevitable for the establishment of a rule of law that is inclusive, an accessible judiciary is even more important to allow the justice system to reach out to the most disadvantaged people or to prevent minorities from being more marginalized. An inclusive judiciary also refers to the idea of an able and willing judiciary that will enforce the rules to ensure inclusiveness in the other two organs of the State. Although the Supreme Court has handed down certain important decisions that will promote inclusive governance generally, a discourse on inclusive judiciary has yet to emerge in Bangladesh. This chapter seeks to address this gap, albeit not comprehensively, by focusing on the inclusivity function of Bangladesh’s superior courts. The analysis is centered around three specific areas of judicial activity—attainment of social justice for marginalized people, participation of women in governance, and the protection of indigenous peoples’ autonomy or cultural diversity.

References

  1. Abeyratne, R. (2014). Socioeconomic Rights in the Indian Constitution: Towards a Broader Conception of Legitimacy. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 39(1), 1–72.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, N. (1999). Public Interest Litigation in Bangladesh: Constitutional Issues and Remedies. Dhaka: BLAST.Google Scholar
  3. Anaya, S. J. (2002). The Contours of Self-determination and Its Implementation: Implications of Developments Concerning Indigenous Peoples. In G. Alfredsson & M. Stravropoulou (Eds.), Justice Pending: Indigenous Peoples and Other Good Causes: Essays in Honor of Erica-Irene Daes (pp. 5–14). The Hague: MartinusNijhoff.Google Scholar
  4. Barber, N. W. (2010). The Constitutional State. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baxi, U. (1969). Directive Principles and Sociology of Indian Law. Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 11(3), 245–272.Google Scholar
  6. Baxi, U. (Ed.). (1988). Law and Poverty: Critical Essays. Bombay: N.M. Tripathi.Google Scholar
  7. Bellamy, R. (Ed.). (2010). From Government to Governance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bhuwania, A. (2016). Courting the People: Public Interest Litigation in Post-emergency India. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bonnafous-Boucher, M. (2005). From Government to Governance. Ethical Perspectives: Journal of the European Ethics Network, 12(4), 521–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Byrne, I., & Hossain, S. (2008). South Asia: Economic and Social Rights Case Law of Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. In M. Langford (Ed.), Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law (pp. 125–143). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Chowdhury, M. J. A. (2012). Claiming a ‘Fundamental Right’ to Basic Necessities of Life: Problems and Prospects of Adjudication in Bangladesh. Indian Journal of Constitutional Law, 6, 184–208.Google Scholar
  12. Dias, C., & Sudarshan, R. (2007). Introduction: Inclusive Governance for Human Development. In UNDP (Ed.), Towards Inclusive Governance: Promoting the Participation of the Disadvantaged Groups in the Asia-pacific (pp. 1–9). Bangkok: UNDP Regional Centre.Google Scholar
  13. Duthu, N. B. (2013). Shadow Nations: Tribal Sovereignty and the Limits of Legal Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fiss, O. M. (1979). The Supreme Court 1978 Term—Foreword: The Forms of Justice. Harvard Law Review, 93, 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fuller, L. L. (1978). The Forms and Limits of Adjudication. Harvard Law Review, 92(2), 353–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gauri, V., & Brinks, D. M. (2010). Courting Social Justice: Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ghai, Y. (2013). Constitutionalism and the Challenge of Ethnic Diversity. In R. L. Nelson, J. J. Heckman, & L. Cabatingan (Eds.), Global Perspectives on the Rule of Law (pp. 279–302). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Ghai, Y., & Cottrell, J. (Eds.). (2004). Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights in Practice: The Role of Judges in Implementing Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. London: Interights.Google Scholar
  19. Haque, M. E. (2012a). In Search of Origin of Recognition of Economic and Social Rights as Constitutional Principles: From Ireland to Bangladesh. Dhaka University Law Journal, 23(2), 79–84.Google Scholar
  20. Haque, M. E. (2012b). Protection of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Critical Analysis of the Fundamental Principles of State Policy in the Constitution of Bangladesh (Unpublished PhD Thesis). Clayton: Monash University.Google Scholar
  21. Hasan, K. M. (2004). Shaping Country’s Legal Contour: Visionary Judges Can Help Build Jurisprudence. Dhaka Law Reports (Journal Section), 56, 39–40.Google Scholar
  22. Hasina, N., & Hasan, G. S. (2015). Reconsideration of Local Government at Village Level: A Legal Study. Global Disclosure of Economics and Business, 4(2), 91–99.Google Scholar
  23. Hoque, R. (2006). Taking Justice Seriously: Judicial Public Interest and Constitutional Activism in Bangladesh. Contemporary South Asia, 15(4), 399–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ———. (2011). Judicial Activism in Bangladesh: A Golden Mean Approach. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. ———. (2013). Constitutionalism and the Judiciary in Bangladesh. In S. Khilnani, V. Raghavan, & A. Thiruvengadam (Eds.), Comparative Constitutionalism in South Asia (pp. 303–340). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. ———. (2014). Courts and the Adjudication System in Bangladesh: In Quest of Viable Reforms. In J.-R. Yeh & W.-C. Chang (Eds.), Asian Courts in Context (pp. 447–486). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ———. (2017). Inclusive Constitutionalism and the Indigenous People of the Chittagong Hill Tracts in Bangladesh. Indian Yearbook of Comparative Law 2016 (pp. 216–247). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hossain, K. (1997). Protection of Fundamental Rights by Public Interest Litigation. In S. Hossain et al. (Eds.), Public Interest Litigation in South Asia: Rights in Search of Remedies (pp. 27–42). Dhaka: University Press Limited.Google Scholar
  29. Hossain, S., Malik, S., & Musa, B. (Eds.). (1997). Public Interest Litigation in South Asia: Rights in Search of Remedies. Dhaka: University Press Limited.Google Scholar
  30. Hunter, R. (2015). More than Just a Different Face? Judicial Diversity and Decision-making. Current Legal Problems, 68(1), 119–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huq, A. F. (1973). Constitution-making in Bangladesh. Pacific Affairs, 46(1), 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ICJ (International Commission of Jurists). (2008). Courts and the Legal Enforcement of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Comparative Experiences of Justiciability. Geneva: ICJ.Google Scholar
  33. Juzhong, Z. (2010). Poverty, Inequality, and Inclusive Growth in Asia: Measurement, Policy Issues, and Country Studies. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  34. Khosla, M. (2010). Making Social Rights Conditional: Lessons from India. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 8(4), 739–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. King, J. (2012). Judging Social Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Michelman, F. I. (2009). The State Action Doctrine. In V. D. Amar & M. V. Tushnet (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Constitutional Law (pp. 228–240). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Michelman, F. I. (2015). Constitutionally Binding Social and Economic Rights as a Compelling Idea: Reciprocating Perturbations in Liberal and Democratic Constitutional Visions. In H. A. Garcia, K. Klare, & L. A. Williams (Eds.), Social and Economic Rights in Theory and Practice: Critical Inquiries (pp. 277–294). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Munger, F. (Ed.). (2006). Law and Poverty. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  39. O’Cinneide, C. (2015). The Constitutionalization of Social and Economic Rights. In H. A. Garcia, K. Klare, & L. A. Williams (Eds.), Social and Economic Rights in Theory and Practice: Critical Inquiries (pp. 258–276). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Pillay, A. (2014). Revisiting the Indian Experience of Economic and Social Rights Adjudication: The Need for a Principled Approach to Judicial Activism and Restraint. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 63(2), 385–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rackley, E. (2013). Women, Judging and the Judiciary: From Difference to Diversity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Rahman, M. M. (2015). Contributions of Women’s Participation in the Local Government of Bangladesh. Sociology Mind, 5, 200–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rajagopal, B. (2007). Pro-Human Rights but Anti-Poor?: A Critical Evaluation of the Indian Supreme Court from a Social Movement Perspective. Human Rights Review, 8(3), 157–186.Google Scholar
  44. Rizvi, G. (2007). Reinventing Government: Putting Democracy and Social Justice Back into the Discourse. In D. A. Rondinelli (Ed.), Public Administration and Democratic Governance: Governments Serving Citizens (pp. 78–115). New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  45. Rizvi, G. (2008). Democracy and Development: Restoring Social Justice at the Core of Good Governance. Colombo: International Center for Ethnic Studies.Google Scholar
  46. Sen, A. (2012). Thirteenth Annual Grotius Lecture Series: The Global Status of Human Rights. American University International Law Review, 27(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  47. Sepúlveda, M. (2008). The Constitutional Court’s Role in Addressing Social Injustice. In M. Langford (Ed.), Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law (pp. 144–162). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Sigdel, S., & Sharma, S. S. (2013). Inclusive Governance in Nepal (A Policy Brief by ESP and UKAID). Available at: http://www.edgroup.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/ESP-IG-Policy-Brief-Final.pdf
  49. Tasioulas, J. (2016, September 7). Minimum Core Obligations: Human Rights in the Here and Now. Melbourne: A Public Lecture at the Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  50. Thiruvengadam, A. K. (2013). Revisiting the Role of the Judiciary in Plural Societies: A Quarter Century Retrospective on Public Interest Litigation in India and the Global South. In S. Khilnani et al. (Eds.), Comparative Constitutionalism in South Asia (pp. 341–369). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Thiruvengadam, A. K., & Hessebon, G. T. (2012). Constitutionalism and Impoverishment: A Complex Dynamic. In M. Rosenfeld & A. Sajo (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (pp. 153–168). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Tiruchelvam, N., & Coomaraswamy, R. (Eds.). (1987). The Role of the Judiciary in Plural Societies. London: Francis Printer.Google Scholar
  53. Vagras, S. R. L. (2005). Does a Diverse Judiciary Attain a Rule of Law That Is Inclusive?: What Grutter v Bollinger Has to Say About Diversity on the Bench. Michigan Journal of Race and Law, 10, 101–152.Google Scholar
  54. Walker, N. (2010). ‘Constitutionalism and the Incompleteness of Democracy: An Iterative Relationship. Netherland Journal of Legal Philosophy, 3, 206–233.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ridwanul Hoque
    • 1
  1. 1.University of DhakaDhakaBangladesh

Personalised recommendations