Including the Excluded: Government Backbenchers and Opposition in the Parliamentary Process in Bangladesh

  • Nizam Ahmed
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the scope and limits of mechanisms used to include the excluded—government backbenchers and opposition Members of Parliament (MPs)—in the parliamentary process in Bangladesh. In almost all Westminster-derived parliaments including the Bangladesh Jatiya Sangsad, several mechanisms have been introduced in recent years, probably the most important being all-party parliamentary committees, to respond to demands for participation by backbenchers in the parliamentary process. Some other mechanisms, such as the provision for (short-lived) half-hour unscheduled debates at the end of each sitting day and the tradition of referring bills to standing committees for scrutiny, have also been devised to encourage cross-bench interaction on important matters. The extent to which this ‘policy of inclusion’ has any meaningful effect on the behavior of the two sets of parliamentary actors in Bangladesh is explored in this chapter. It also identifies other measures and policies for inclusion that have been proposed or adopted for making the two sets of actors active participants, and examines their effect.

References

  1. Ahmed, N. (1994). Unscheduled Debates in Parliament and the Quest for Executive Accountability: The Case of Bangladesh. Journal of Constitutional and Parliamentary Studies, 28(1&2), 25–47.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, N. (2002). The Parliament of Bangladesh. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  3. Ahmed, N. (2010). Parliamentary Committees and Government Accountability in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Public Administration, 19(1&2), 101–139.Google Scholar
  4. Ahmed, N. (2011). Abolition or Reform? Non-Party Caretaker System and Government Succession in Bangladesh. The Round Table, 100(414), 303–321.Google Scholar
  5. Ahmed, N. (2013). The Bangladesh Parliament: A Data Handbook. Dhaka: IGS.Google Scholar
  6. Bangladesh Parliament. (2007). Rules of Procedure of the Parliament of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh (as corrected up to 2007). Dhaka: Parliament Secretariat.Google Scholar
  7. Benda, S. R. (1997). Committees in Legislatures: A Division of Labor. In L. Longley & A. Agh (Eds.), The Changing Roles of Parliamentary Committees (pp. 17–50). Appleton: Research Committee of Legislative Specialists, Lawrence University.Google Scholar
  8. Hague, R., & Harrop, M. (1982). Comparative Government. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Hakim, M. A. (1993). Bangladesh Politics: The Shahabuddin Interregnum. Dhaka: UPL.Google Scholar
  10. Jogerst, M. (1993). Reform in the House of Commons. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  11. King, A. (1976). Modes of Executive-Legislative Relations: Great Britain, France, and West Germany. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 1(1), 11–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Melhuish, D., & Cowley, P. (1995). Whither the New Role in Policymaking? Conservative MPs in Standing Committees, 1979–1992. Journal of Legislative Studies, 1(4), 54–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rush, M. (1983). Parliamentary Committees and Parliamentary Government: The British and Canadian Experiences. Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 26(2), 138–154.Google Scholar
  14. Shaw, M. (1998). Parliamentary Committees: A Global Perspective. In L. Longley & R. Davidson (Eds.), The New Role of Parliamentary Committees (pp. 225–251). London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  15. TIB (Transparency International Bangladesh). (2007). The Eighth Parliament in the Institutionalization of Democracy (2001–2006). (in Bengali). Dhaka: TIB.Google Scholar
  16. Wheare, K. C. (1968). Legislatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nizam Ahmed
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ChittagongChittagongBangladesh

Personalised recommendations