‘Lobby Fodder or Fearless Champions?’ The Role of Backbenchers in Holding Government to Account

  • Ruth Fox
Chapter

Abstract

What is the role and function of a backbench MP, and are there differences in approach in different legislative systems? What shapes their scrutiny role and work, and how are these factors affected by constitutional, electoral, personal and political circumstances at both constituency and legislative level? Drawing on examples from a range of parliaments in South Asia and beyond, this chapter explores what conditions enable backbenchers to exercise influence and conversely what constrains them. Looking at examples from the renaissance of backbench rights at Westminster in recent years, it identifies the kind of institutional reforms that can promote a more inclusive and accountable legislature. But it concludes that ultimately new procedural rules and powers cannot make backbenchers more effective if they lack the political will and determination to hold government to account. Backbenchers must be willing to use the procedures and powers at their disposal.

References

  1. Ahmed, N. (2013). The Bangladesh Parliament. A Data Handbook. Dhaka: IGS.Google Scholar
  2. Backbench Business Committee. (2015). First Special Report: Work of the Committee in the 2010–15 Parliament. London: UK Parliament.Google Scholar
  3. Bagehot, W. (1867). The English Constitution. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Bercow, J. (2009). Parliamentary Reform: The Route from Here to There. London: Hansard Society. http://www.johnbercow.co.uk/content/parliamentary-reform-route-here-there.Google Scholar
  5. Carswell, D. (2012). The End of Politics and the Birth of iDemocracy. London: Biteback Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Cowley, P., & Stuart, M. (2012). The Bumper Book of Coalition Rebellion. http://nottspolitics.org/2012/05/08/the-bumper-book-of-coalition-rebellions/
  7. Crewe, E. (2015). The House of Commons: An Anthropology of MPs at Work. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  8. Fenno, R. (2003). Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  9. Foster, D. (2015). Going ‘Where Angels Fear to Tread’: How Effective Was the Backbench Business Committee in the 2010–12 Parliamentary Session? Parliamentary Affairs, 68(1), 116–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lynskey, J. (1970). The Role of Backbenchers in the Modification of Government Policy. Western Political Quarterly, 23(2), 333–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mulder van der Vegt, D., & Cohen de Lara, M. (2016). Parliaments. Amsterdam: XML.Google Scholar
  12. Riddell, P. (2000). Parliament Under Blair. London: Politicos.Google Scholar
  13. Rogers, R., & Gay, O. (2009). Suggestions for Possible Changes to the Procedure and Business of the House, SN/PC/05110. London: House of Commons Library (Parliament and Constitution Centre).Google Scholar
  14. Samara Democracy Report. (2012). Who’s the Boss? Canadian Views on Their Democracy (Report #4). http://www.samaracanada.com/research/political-leadership/who’s-the-boss-
  15. Select Committee on Reform of the House of Commons. (2009). Rebuilding the House (First Report of Session 2008–09, HC 1117). London: UK Parliament.Google Scholar
  16. Wright, T. (2012). Doing Politics. London: Biteback Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth Fox
    • 1
  1. 1.Hansard SocietyLondonUK

Personalised recommendations