What Else Can Schools Do?

Part of the Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education book series (GED)


This chapter draws on key themes from earlier chapters to identify how schools could more effectively support girls from disadvantaged backgrounds achieve their aspirations. These themes focus on confidence and trust , feelings of being valued, achieving dreams and successful learning behaviour. Central to this discussion are the girls’ own perspectives, which identify in particular what they and their schools could have done differently, so the concluding suggestions for education practice development are based on ‘insider’ experiences of what schools offer.


Schools Teachers Strategies Girls’ perspectives 


  1. Achievement for All. (2016a). Why we exist. Accessed 29 Sept 2016.Google Scholar
  2. Achievement for All. (2016b). Achievement for all impact report 2015–2016. Newbury: AfA.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, M. (2013). Silenced Voices. Keynote lecture, Newman College, 25 April 2013.Google Scholar
  4. Centre for Social Justice. (2014). Closing the divide. Tackling education inequality in England. London: Centre for Social Justice.Google Scholar
  5. Cummings, C., Laing, K., Law, J., McLaughlin, J., Papps, I., Todd, L., et al. (2012). Can changing aspirations and attitudes impact on educational achievement? A review of interventions. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. Education Endowment Fund (EEF). (2013). The Sutton trust-EEF teaching and learning toolkit. London: Education Endowment Fund.Google Scholar
  7. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Hutchinson, J., Dunford, J., & Treadwell, M. (2016). Divergent pathways: The disadvantage gap, accountability and the pupil premium. London: The Education Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Khattab, N. (2015). Students’ aspirations, expectations and school achievement: What really matters? British Educational Research Journal, 41(5), 731–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ofsted. (2013). Unseen children: Access and achievement 20 years on. Manchester: Ofsted.Google Scholar
  11. Ofsted. (2016). Ofsted issues warning about education in the East Midlands. London: Ofsted (https:/ Accessed 08 June 2016.
  12. Plummer, G. (2000). Failing Working–class Girls. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham.Google Scholar
  13. Public Health England. (2014). Local action on health inequalities: Building children and young people’s resilience in schools. London: Public Health England.Google Scholar
  14. Review, Marmot. (2010). Fair society, healthy lives: Strategic review of health inequalities in England post-2010. London: Marmot Review Team.Google Scholar
  15. Roth, S., & Erstad, O. (2015). Positional identities in educational transitions: Connecting contemporary and future trajectories among multi-ethnic girls. Ethnography and Education, 11(1), 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sammons, P., Toth, K., & Sylva, K. (2016). Believing in Better. How Aspirations and Academic Self Concept Shape Young People’s Outcomes. London: Sutton Trust.Google Scholar
  17. Sharpe, C., Macleod, S., Bernardinelli, D., Skipp, A., & Higgins, S. (2015). Supporting the attainment of disadvantaged pupils. Briefing for school leaders. London: DfE.Google Scholar
  18. Verma, G., & Kalekin, D. (2017). Approaches to educational and social inclusion. Abingdon: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Wilshaw, M. (2013). Unseen children, HMI’s speech 20th June 2013.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nottingham Institute of EducationNottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations