Skip to main content

Analysing Transnational Web Spheres

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 161 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter outlines the methodological approach and research design. The Web sphere analysis combines frame and network analyses, which are based on a quantitative-qualitative content analysis of online communication sampled from relevant online platforms. After introducing the methods and describing the sample, each analytical step is briefly explained: this covers an exact reconstruction of the selection, filtration, and summarisation processes for data collection. Furthermore, the chapter makes the case for bridging the quantitative-qualitative divide in content analytical research. The main argument is: both the produced messages about a topic and the relationships between communicators need to be screened from multiple angles before a web sphere can be described and examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baumann, E., and H. Scherer 2012. Wider das Ideologische. Plädoyer für den Pragmatismus in der Kombination qualitativer und quantitativer Methoden in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. In Methodenkombination in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Methodologische Herausforderungen und empirische Praxis, ed. W. Loosen and A. Scholl. Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, W.L., and R.L. Holbert. 2008. Empirical Intersections in Communication Research Replication, Mutlitple Quantiative Methods, and Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide. Journal of Communication 58: 615–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borah, P. 2011. Conceptual Issues in Framing Theory. A Systematic Examination of a Decade’s Literature. Journal of Communication 61: 246–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosius, H.B., F. Koschel, and A. Haas. 2008. Methoden der Empirischen Kommunikationsforschung. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn- Jensen, K. 2002. A Handbook of Media and Communication Research. Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, A. 2013. Faster than the Speed of Print. Reconciling “Big Data” Social Media Analysis and Academic Scholarship. First Monday 18 (10). Online accessible at http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4879. Accessed 05 Dec 2014.

  • Chong, D., and J.N. Druckman. 2007. Framing Theory. Annual Political Science Review of Political Science 10: 103–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Angelo, P., and J.A. Kuypers. 2010. Introduction. Doing News Framing Analysis. In Doing News Framing Analysis, ed. P. D’Angelo and J.A. Kuypers. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Angelo, P. 2002. News Framing as a Multiparadigmatic Research Program. A Response to Entman. Journal of Communication 52 (4): 870–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, C.C., J.M. Atun, E. Fille, and C. Monterola. 2011. Finding Frames Comparing Two Models of Frame Analysis. Communication Methods and Measures 5 (4): 329–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Swert, K. 2012. Calculating Inter-Coder Reliability in Media Content Analysis Using Krippendorff’s Alpha. Online available at http://www.polcomm.org/wp-content/uploads/ICR01022012.pdf. Accessed 04 Dec 2014.

  • Entman, R.M. 1991. Framing U.S. Coverage of International News. Contrasts in Narratives of the KAL and Iran Air Incidents. Journal of Communication 41 (4): 729–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entman, R.M. 1993. Framing Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entman, R.M. 2004. Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, L.E., A.D. Cai, and Q. Wang 2013. Quantitative Methods for Conflict Communication Research. In The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication. Integrating Theory, Research, and Practice, ed. J.G. Oetzel and Ting-Toomey. S. Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Früh, W. 2007. Die Inhaltsanalyse. Konstanz: UVK/UTB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, B. 2000. Media Research Methods. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A.F., and K. Krippendorff. 2007. Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data. Communication Methods and Measures 1: 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuckartz, U. 2010. Einführung in die Computergestützte Analyse qualitativer Daten. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuckartz, U. 2012. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthes, J. 2014. Framing. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matthes, J., and M. Kohring. 2008. The Content Analysis of Media Frames Toward Improving Reliability and Validity. Journal of Communication 58: 258–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. 2008. Neuere Entwicklungen in der qualitativen Forschung und der Qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse. In Die Praxis der qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse, ed. P. Mayring and M. Gläser-Zikuda. Weinheim: Beltz Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. 2010. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. Weinheim: Beltz Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, S.J. 2009. The Challenge of Applying Content Analysis to the World Wide Web. In The Content Analysis Reader, ed. K. Krippendorff and M.A. Bock, 60–68. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuernbergk, C. 2012. Inhaltsanalyse und Netzwerkanalyse. Methodenkombination am Beispiel einer Metatextanalyse über das Verhältnis von Weblogs und Journalismus. In Methodenkombination in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Methodologische Herausforderungen und empirische Praxis, ed. W. Loosen and A. Scholl. Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J.E. 2007. Analysing Newspapers. An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharkow, M., and M. Mahrt. 2013. The Value of Big Data in Digital Media Research. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 57 (1): 20–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharkow, Michael. 2012. Automatische Inhaltsanalyse und Maschinelles Lernen. Berlin: Universität der Künste Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., and C. Teddlie (eds.). 2010. Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks (California): Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terfrüchte, L. 2011. Symbolverwendung im Jorunalismus. Eine empirische Fallstudie zur öffentlich-rechtlichen Fernsehberichterstattung. Münster: University of Münster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vliegenthart, R., and L. Van Zoonen. 2011. Power to the Frames Bringing Sociology Back to Frame Analysis. European Journal of Communication 26 (2): 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welker, M., C. Wünsch, S. Böcking, A. Bock, A. Friedemann, M. Herbers et al. 2010. Die Online-Inhaltsanalyse. Methodische Herausforderung, aber ohne Alternative. In Die Online-Inhaltsanalyse. Forschungsobjekt Internet, ed. M. Welker and C. Wünsch. Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis Nguyen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nguyen, D. (2017). Analysing Transnational Web Spheres. In: Europe, the Crisis, and the Internet. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60843-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics