Dynamic Model of Athletes’ Emotions Based on Wearable Devices

  • Damien DupréEmail author
  • Ben Bland
  • Andrew Bolster
  • Gawain Morrison
  • Gary McKeown
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 603)


With the development of wearable sensors, it is now possible to assess the dynamic progression of physiological rhythms such as heart rate, breathing rate or galvanic skin response in ways and places that were previously impractical. This paper presents a new application that synchronizes the emotional patterns from these time-series in order to model athletes’ emotion during physical activity. This data analysis computes a best-fitting model for analyzing the patterns given by these measurements “in the wild”. The recording setup used to measure and synchronize multiple biometric physiological sensors can be called a BAN (Body Area Network) of personal measurements. By monitoring physical activity, it is now possible to calculate optimal patterns for managing athletes’ emotion. The data provided here are not restricted by a lab environment but close to the “ground truth” of ecologically valid physiological changes. The data allow the provision of accurate feedback to athletes about their emotion (e.g. in cases such as an unexpected increase or an expected decrease of physiological activity).


Physiology Wearable sensors Multimodal measure Outdoor activities Time-series 


  1. 1.
    Hauw, D., Rochat, N., Gesbert, V., Astolfi, T., Philippe, R.A., Mariani, B.: Putting together first-and third-person approaches for sport activity analysis: the case of ultra-trail runners’ performance analysis. In: Advances in Human Factors in Sports and Outdoor Recreation, pp. 49–58. Springer (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schwaberger, G.: Heart rate, metabolic and hormonal responses to maximal psycho-emotional and physical stress in motor car racing drivers. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 59(6), 579–604 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lucia, A., Hoyos, J., Carvajal, A., Chicharro, J.: Heart rate response to professional road cycling: the Tour de France. Int. J. Sports Med. 20(03), 167–172 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cavalade, M., Papadopoulou, V., Theunissen, S., Balestra, C.: Heart rate variability and critical flicker fusion frequency changes during and after parachute jumping in experienced skydivers. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 115(7), 1533–1545 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hetland, A.: Feeling the extreme: an exploratory study of experienced emotions during extreme sport. University of Tromsø, Norway, Master thesis (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hetland, A., Vittersø, J.: The feelings of extreme risk: exploring emotional quality and variability in skydiving and BASE jumping. J. Sport Behav. 35(2), 154–180 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scherer, K.R.: The dynamic architecture of emotion: evidence for the component process model. Cogn. Emot. 23(7), 1307–1351 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scherer, K.R.: Appraisal theory. In: Dalgleish, T., Power, M.J. (eds.) Handbook of Cognition and Emotion, pp. 637–663. Wiley, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Russell, J.A., Fernandez-Dols, J.M.: The Psychology of Facial Expression. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frijda, N.H.: Emotion, cognitive structure, and action tendency. Cogn. Emot. 1(2), 115–143 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Damasio, A., Carvalho, G.B.: The nature of feelings: evolutionary and neurobiological origins. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14(2), 143–152 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kreibig, S.D., Samson, A.C., Gross, J.J.: The psychophysiology of mixed emotional states. Psychophysiology 50(8), 799–811 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kreibig, S.D.: Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: a review. Biol. Psychol. 84(3), 394–421 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Holliman, J., Zhivich, M., Khazan, R., Swiston, A., Telfer, B.: Building low-power trustworthy systems: cyber-security considerations for real-time physiological status monitoring. Presented at the Military Communications Conference, pp. 1083–1089 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rushanan, M., Rubin, A.D., Kune, D.F., Swanson, C.M.: SoK: security and privacy in implantable medical devices and body area networks. Presented at the Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 524–539 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mehrabian, A., Russell, J.A.: An Approach to Environmental Psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge (1974)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fuller, M.S.: ‘Hey, Nice Run!’ Exploring Motives for Smartphone Exercise App Use, University of Connecticut (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bartholomew, K.J., Arnold, R., Hampson, R.J., Fletcher, D.: Organizational stressors and basic psychological needs: the mediating role of athletes’ appraisal mechanisms. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 16, 1–13 (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Apicella, C., Demiral, E.E., Mollerstrom, J.: No Gender Difference in Willingness to Compete When Competing Against Self. DIW Berlin, Berlin (2017)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Karkazis, K., Fishman, J.R.: Tracking US professional athletes: the ethics of biometric technologies. Am. J. Bioeth. 17(1), 45–60 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Damien Dupré
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ben Bland
    • 2
  • Andrew Bolster
    • 2
  • Gawain Morrison
    • 2
  • Gary McKeown
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PsychologyQueen’s UniversityBelfastUK
  2. 2.SensumCo. Ltd.BelfastUK

Personalised recommendations