Abstract
The loss of an eye is certainly a devastating situation. Reconstruction of the socket in the pediatric age group is extremely important, not only for the immediate appearance and psychological benefit of the child and the parents but also for the long-term growth and health of the orbit in younger children. The presence of an eye is necessary for normal orbital growth. With the loss of an eye, as in severe microphthalmia or anophthalmos, orbital growth may arrest. If this occurs, the entire growth of the face is affected and significant deformities can result. A great deal has been written on how to reconstruct and augment the soft tissue of the pediatric socket. This chapter discusses and summarizes techniques that have demonstrated good results in the collective experience of the oculoplastic contributors to this text.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ruedeman AD. Plastic eye implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 1946;29:947–52.
Danz W. Motility implants: a review. In: Bosniak SL, Smith BC, editors. Advances in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery: the anophthalmic socket, vol. 8. New York: Pergamon; 1990. p. 46–52.
Troutman RC. Five year survey on the use of a magnetic implant for improving cosmetic results of enucleation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1954:531–58.
Allen L, Spivey BE, Burns CA. A larger Iowa implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969;68:397–400.
Fan JT, Robertson DM. Long-term follow-up of the Allen implant: 1967–1991. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:510–6.
Anderson RL, Thiese SM, Nerad JN, et al. The universal orbital implant: indication and methods. In: Bosniak SL, Smith BC, editors. Advances in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery: the anophthalmic socket, vol. 8. New York: Pergamon; 1990. p. 88–99.
Choyce DP. Orbital implants: review of the results obtained at the Moorfields branch of the Moorfields, Westminster, and Central Eye Hospitals, London. Br J Ophthalmol. 1952;36:123–30.
Castrin JA. Experiences with different orbital implants after enucleation. Acta Ophthalmol. 1963;41:435–44.
Gougelmann HP. The evolution of the ocular motility implant. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1970:689–733.
Nunery WR, Cepela MA, Heinz GW, et al. Extrusion rate of silicone spherical anophthalmic socket implants. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;9:90–5.
Perry AC. Advances in enucleation. Ophthalmol Clin N Am. 1991;8:75–81.
Perry AC. Integrated orbital implants. In: Bosniak SL, Smith BC, editors. Advances in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery: the anophthalmic socket, vol. 8. New York: Pergamon; 1990. p. 75–87.
Nunery WR, Heinz GW, Bonnin JM, et al. Exposure rate of hydroxyapatite spheres in the anophthalmic socket: histopathologic correlation and comparison with silicone sphere implants. Ophthal Plastic Reconstr Surg. 1993;9:96–14.
Lin CW, Liao SL. Long-term complications of different porous orbital implants: a 21-year review. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(5):681–685. pii: bjophthalmol-2016-308932. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308932.
Schellini S, Jorge E, Sousa R, Burroughs J, El-Dib R. Porous and nonporous orbital implants for treating the anophthalmic socket: a meta-analysis of case series studies. Orbit. 2016;35(2):78–86. doi:10.3109/01676830.2016.1139591. Epub 2016 Feb 29
Mourits DL, Moll AC, Bosscha MI, Tan HS, Hartong DT. Orbital implants in retinoblastoma patients: 23 years of experience and a review of the literature. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94(2):165–74. doi:10.1111/aos.12915. Epub 2015 Nov 25. Review
Drobesk HP, Rothstein SS, Gumaer KI, et al. Histologic observation of soft tissue responses to implants, multifaceted particles and discs of hydroxyapatite. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984;42:143–9.
Roses HM, McFarland MM. The biological behavior of hydroxyapatite implanted into the maxillofacial skeleton. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;85:718–23.
Piecuch JF. Extraskeletal implantation of a porous hydroxyapatite ceramic. J Dent Res. 1982;61:1458–60.
Chao SY, Poon CK. Histologic study of tissue response to implanted hydroxyapatite in two patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987;45:359–62.
Kazim M, Katowitz JA, Fallon M, Piest KL. Evaluation of a collagen/hydroxyapatite implant for orbital reconstructive surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;8:94–108.
Ferrone PJ, Dutton JJ. Rate of vascularization of coralline hydroxyapatite ocular implants. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:376–9.
Rubin PA, Popham JK, Bilyk JW, Shore JW. Comparison of fibrovascular ingrowth into hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene orbital implants. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;10:96–103.
Tambe K, Pushpoth S, Mudhar HS, Sandramouli S. A histopathologic study of orbital implant vascularization. Orbit. 2009;28(1):50–7.
Jordan DR, Bawazer A. Experience with 120 synthetic hydroxyapatite implants (FCl3). Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;17(3):184–90.
Perry AC. Eradication of HIV from HIV impregnated sclera. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, San Francisco, California, 29 October 1994.
Guidelines for preventing transmission of human immunodeficiency virus through transplantation of human tissue and organs. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia, 20 May 1994.
Bedrossian EH. HIV and banked fascia lata. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;7:284–8.
Michel RG, Patterson CN. Evaluation of sclera as a homograft in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery. Facial Plast Surg. 1978;86:206–13.
Bodian M. Repair of ptosis using human sclera. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968;65:352–8.
Heher K, Katowitz J, Low J. Unilateral dermis-fat implantation in the pediatric orbit. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;14(2):81–8.
Katowitz JA. Orbital expansion with dermis-fat grafts in the pediatric age group. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, Anaheim, California, 14 October 1991.
Crawford JS, Doucet TW. Uses of fascia in ophthalmology and the benefits of autogenous sources. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1982;19:21–5.
Jordon DR, Anderson RL. Obtaining fascia lata. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:1139–40.
Jordan DR, Klapper SR. Chapter 14: controversies in enucleation technique and implant selection: whether to wrap, attach muscles, and peg? In: Guthoff R, Katowitz J, editors. Essentials of ophthalmology, Orbit, vol. 3. Berlin: Springer; 2008. p. 195–201.
Shah SU, Shields CL, Lally SE, Shields JA. Hydroxyapatite orbital implant in children following enucleation: analysis of 531 sockets. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;31(2):108–14.
Small RG. Exenteration of the orbit: indications and techniques. In: Smith BC, Della Rocca RC, Nesi FA, Lisman RD, editors. Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. St. Louis: Mosby; 1987. p. 1151–64.
Kherani F and Katowitz J Pediatric eyelid and conjunctival sparing orbital exenteration. Canadian Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, 2005.
Looi A, Kazim M, Cortes M, Rootman J. Orbital reconstruction and eyelid- and conjunctiva-sparing orbital exenteration. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;22:1–6. Heher KL, Katowitz JA, Low JE. Unilateral dermis-fat graft implantation in the pediatric orbit. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;14(2): 81–8.
Handler LF, Heher KL, Katowitz JA. Chapter 30 Management of the microphthalmic orbit. In: Katowitz JA, editor. Pediatric oculoplastic surgery. Berlin: Springer; 2002. p. 576–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kherani, F., Mehta, S., Katowitz, J.A. (2018). Pediatric Enucleation, Evisceration, and Exenteration Techniques. In: Katowitz, J., Katowitz, W. (eds) Pediatric Oculoplastic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60814-3_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60814-3_41
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60812-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60814-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)