Production, Reproduction and Consumption

  • Ellen AnnandaleEmail author


To address the global production of health inequalities, data on life expectancies are explored in the context of neoliberal governance since the 1980s ‘Lifestyle behaviours’ in Eastern Europe are explored as a study of how swift the impact of socio-economic change can be on health. Next, health identities and the ‘consumption’ and ‘reproduction’ of health are considered along with associations between health, (bio)capital and the governance of health in the milieu of prevailing individual lifestyle explanations for illness and ‘mHealth’ (mobile health technologies). The global organ trade helps delve into health expectations and achievements of health through consumption. Focusing on human reproduction, ‘biogenetic trade’ and global ‘reproscapes’, ‘egg donation’ and commercial surrogacy are taken as case examples.


  1. Ambagtsheer, F., Zaitch, D., & Weimer, W. (2013). The battle for human organs: Organ trafficking and transplant tourism in global context. Global Crime, 14(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Appadurai, A. (1986). Introduction: Commodities and the politics of value. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The social life of things (pp. 3–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large. London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartley, M. (2017). Health inequality (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  7. Bauman, Z. (2011). Collateral damage. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  9. Buck, D., & Maguire, D. (2015). Inequalities in life expectancy: Changes over time and implications for policy. London: King’s Fund.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, L. (2009). Operability, bioavailability, and exception. In A. Ong & S. Collier (Eds.), Global assemblages (pp. 79–90). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Collins, C., McCartney, G., & Garnham, L. (2016). Neoliberalism and health inequalities. In K. Smith, S. Hill, & C. Bambra (Eds.), Health inequalities: Critical perspectives (pp. 124–137). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cooper, M. (2008). Life as surplus: Biotechnology and capitalism in the neoliberal era. London: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  13. Crawford, R. (1984). A cultural account of ‘health’: Control, release, and the social body. In J. McKinlay (Ed.), Issues in the political economy of health care (pp. 60–103). London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  14. Crawford, R. (2006). Health as meaningful social practice. Health, 10(4), 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crawshaw, P. (2012). Governing at a distance: Social marketing and the (bio)politics of responsibility. Social Science & Medicine, 75, 200–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Vogli, R. (2011). Neoliberal globalisation and health in a time of economic crisis. Social Theory and Health, 9(4), 311–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Vogli, R., Kouvonen, A., Elovainio, M., & Marmot, M. (2014). Economic globalization, inequality and body mass index: A cross-national analysis of 127 countries. Critical Public Health, 24(1), 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dickens, C. (2008 [1859]). A tale of two cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Doyal, L. (2013). Living with HIV and dying with AIDS. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  20. Engels, F. (1845). The condition of the working class in England in 1844. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Engels, F. (2001 [1877]). Herr Dühring’s revolution in science. London: Lawrence. (trans: Burns, E.). London: ElectricBook Co.Google Scholar
  22. Foucault, M. (1980). In C. Gordon (Ed.), Michel Foucault. Power/knowledge. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
  23. Fries, C. J. (2008). Governing the health of the hybrid self: Integrative medicine, neoliberalism, and the shifting biopolitics of subjectivity. Health Sociology Review, 17(4), 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glasgow, S., & Schrecker, T. (2015). The double burden of neoliberalism? Noncommunicable disease policies and the global political economy of risk. Health and Place, 34, 279–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gunnarsson Payne, J. (2015). Reproduction in transition: Cross-border egg donation, biodesirability and new reproductive subjectivities on the European fertility market. Gender, Place and Culture, 22(1), 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haken, J. (2011). Transnational crime in the developing world. Washington, DC: Global Financial Integrity.Google Scholar
  27. Harvey, D. (2010). The enigma of capital. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  28. Inhorn, M. (2011). Globalization and gametes: Reproductive ‘tourism,’ Islamic bioethics, and Middle Eastern modernity. Anthropology & Medicine, 18(1), 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lock, M., & Nguyen, V. (2010). An anthropology of biomedicine. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Lupton, D. (2012). Medicine as culture (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Lupton, D. (2013a). Fat. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Lupton, D. (2013b). Quantifying the body: Monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Critical Public Health, 23(4), 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marmot, M. (2015). The health gap. The challenge of an unequal world. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  34. Marx, K. (1974 [1932]). Economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Millington, B. (2016). ‘Quantify the invisible’: Notes toward a future of posture. Critical Public Health, 26(4), 405–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nahman, M. (2008). Nodes of desire. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 15(2), 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oxfam. (2016). An economy for the 1%. Oxford: Oxfam International.Google Scholar
  38. Pan American Health Association (PAHO). (2016). Dimensions of noncommunicable diseases in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: PAHO.Google Scholar
  39. Pande, A. (2014). Wombs in labor: Transnational commercial surrogacy in India. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pfeffer, N. (2011). Eggs-ploiting women. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 23(5), 634–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century (trans: Goldhammer, A.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Potter, J. (2015). Does the Iranian model of kidney donation compensation work as an ethical global model? Online Journal of Health Ethics, 11(1). doi: 10.18785/ojhe.1101.11.
  43. Rich, E., & Miah, A. (2017). Mobile, wearable and ingestible health technologies: Towards a critical research agenda. Health Sociology Review, 26(1), 84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ritzer, G. (2010). Enchanting a disenchanted world. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010). Production, consumption, prosumption. The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rose, N. (2007). Molecular biopolitics, somatic ethics and the spirit of biocapital. Social Theory and Health, 5, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rudrappa, S. (2015). Discounted life. The price of global surrogacy in India. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sarojini, N., Marwah, V., & Shenoi, A. (2011). Globalisation of birth markets. Globalization and Health, 7, 27. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-7-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sayer, A. (2016). Why we can’t afford the rich. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  50. Scheper-Hughes, N. (2001a). Commodity fetishism in organ trafficking. In N. Scheper-Hughes & L. Wacquant (Eds.), Commodifying bodies (pp. 31–62). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Scheper-Hughes, N. (2001b). Neo-cannibalism: The global trade in human organs. The Hedgehog Review, 3(2), 79–99.Google Scholar
  52. Scheper-Hughes, N. (2003). Rotten trade: Millennial capitalism, human values and global justice in organs trafficking. Journal of Human Rights, 2(2), 197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schrecker, T., & Bambra, C. (2015). How politics makes us sick: Neoliberal epidemics. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stuckler, D. (2013). The body economic. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  55. Stuckler, D., & Nestle, M. (2012). Big food, food systems, and global health. PLoS Medicine, 9(6), e1001242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Suisse, C. (2016). Global wealth report 2016. Zurich: Credit Suisse.Google Scholar
  57. Thualagant, N. (2016). Body management and the quest for performative health. Social Theory and Health, 14(2), 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Toffler, A. (1980). Third wave. New York: Collins.Google Scholar
  59. Waldby, C. (2002). Stem cells, tissue cultures and the production of biovalue. Health, 6(3), 305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Waldby, C., & Mitchell, R. (2006). Tissue economies. Blood, organs, and cell lines in late capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. WHO. (2015). World health statistics 2015. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  62. WHO. (2016). World health statistics 2016. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  63. Wilkinson, S. (2003). Bodies for sale. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. World Health Organisation (WHO). (2014). Global status report on noncommunicable diseases. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  65. Yea, S. (2015). Masculinity under the knife: Filipino men, trafficking and the black organ market in Manila, the Philippines. Gender, Place and Culture, 22(1), 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of YorkYorkUK

Personalised recommendations