Abstract
Modern sociologists agree in that individuality is the structure of personhood typical of modern subjects. It is characterized by a sense of autonomous agency based on an independent, self-awareness which forms the core of personal identity. Individuality fosters a certain emotional detachment from outside reality—which is processed through rational control—and a concomitant sense of power over the world, materialized through technology and work specialization. Enlightenment thought saw Western history as a trajectory culminating in the triumph of the individual, who had outgrown all emotional (mythical) bonds with external reality, embracing rationality and science instead. The hypothesis of this book, however, is that emotional bonds and communal belonging are unavoidable, as they constitute the indispensable foundation of ontological security; without them, truly isolated subjects would feel all the weight of their powerlessness in the face of incommensurable natural forces. What gradual male individuality involved was not a progressive emotional detachment from the world but a progressive unrecognition of their emotional bonds instead, which continued to be acted in an unconscious level. Understanding this process may be the key to unlocking how the patriarchal order works. But first we must turn to the mechanism of identity operating at surface level, where, in fact, individualized traits were gradually superseding relational ones in masculine identity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
R&D Project (Hum2006-06276), “Ethnoarchaeology of the Awá-Guajá, a group of hunter-gatherers in transition to agriculture (Maranhão, Brazil)”, financed by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology.
- 5.
Beckerman and Valentine (eds.) (2002) review the question of Amazonian multiple paternity. The specific case of the Awá is referred to by Forline (1997: 168) and Cormier (2003a: 64–65). From a sociobiological point of view, multiple paternity has been interpreted as an (unconscious) female strategy to ensure the involvement of several men in obtaining resources for their children’s survival (Hrdy 1999: xxii).
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
References
Balée, W. (1994). Footprints of the Forest. Ka’apor Ethnobotany. The Historical Ecology of Plant Utilization by an Amazonian People. New York: Columbia University Press.
Beckerman, S., & Valentine, P. (Eds.). (2002). Cultures of multiple fathers. The theory and practice of Partible Paternity in Lowland South America. Miami: University of Florida Press.
Begler, E. B. (1978). Sex, status, and authority in Egalitarian society. American Anthropologist (New Series), 80(3), 571–588.
Campbell, A. T. (1989). To square with genesis. Causal statements and shamanic ideas in Wayapí. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
Chodorow, N. J. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cormier, L. A. (2003a). Kinship with monkeys. The Guajá foragers of Eastern Amazonia. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.
Cormier, L. A. (2003b). Decolonizing history. Ritual transformation of the past among the Guajá of Eastern Amazonia. In N. L. Whitehead (Ed.), Histories and historicities in Amazonia (pp. 123–139). Lincoln/Londres: University of Nebraska Press.
Cowell, A. (1973). The tribe that hides from man. Nueva York: Stein and Day Publishers.
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error. New York: G.P. Putnam.
Descola, P. (2001). The genres of gender: Local models and global paradigms in the comparison of Amazonia and Melanesia. In T. Gregor & D. Tuzin (Eds.), Gender in Amazonia and Melanesia (pp. 91–114). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dio Bleichmar, E. (1998). La sexualidad femenina. De la niña a la mujer. Paidós: Buenos Aires.
Eliade, M. (1959). The sacred and the profane; the nature of religion. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Fausto, C. (1999). Of enemies and pets: Warfare and shamanism in Amazonia. American Ethnologist, 26, 933–956.
Fausto, C., & Viveiros de Castro, E. (1993). La puissance et l’acte: La parenté dans les basses terres de l’Amérique du Sud. L’Homme (126–128), 141–170.
Fausto-Sterling, A. (1985). Myths of gender. Biological theories about women and men. Nueva York: Basic Books.
Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books.
Flanagan, J. G. (1989). Hierarchy in simple ‘Egalitarian’ societies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 18, 245–266.
Forline, L. C. (1997). The persistence and cultural transformations of the Guajá Indians: Foragers or Maranhão State, Brazil. PhD thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Fried, M. H. (1967). The evolution of political society. Nueva York: Random House.
Gándara, M. (1990). La analogía etnográfica como heurística: lógica muestral, dominios ontológicos e historicidad. In Y. Sugiera & P. María Carmen Serra (Eds.), Etnoarqueología. Coloquio Bosch Gimpera (pp. 43–82). México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self identity: Self and society in Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
González Ruibal, A., & Hernando, A. (2010). Genealogies of destruction. Archaeology of the contemporary past in the Amazonian forest, Archaeologies. Journal of the World Archaeological Congress, 6(1), 5–28.
Gow, P. (1989). The perverse child: Desire in a native Amazonian subsistence economy. Man (New Series), 24(4), 567–582.
Havelock, E. A. (1986). The muse learns to write: Reflections on orality and literacy from antiquity to the present. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hernando, A. (2006). Arqueología y globalización. El problema de la definición del ‘otro’ en la postmodernidad. Complutum , 17 (221–234).
Hernando, A., Politis, G., González Ruibal, A., & Coello, E. B. (2011). Gender, power and mobility among the Awá-Guajá (Maranhão, Brasil). Journal of Anthropological Research, 67(2), 189–211.
Hrdy, S. B. (1999). The woman that never evolved. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kent, S. (1993). Sharing in an egalitarian Kalahari community. Man (New Series), 28(3), 479–514.
Kozák, V., Baxter, D., Williamson, L., & Carneiro, R. L. (1979). The Héta indians: fishing in a dry pond. Nueva York: Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History (55:6).
Leacock, E. B. (1992). Women’ status in egalitarian society. Implications for social evolution. Current Anthropology, 33(1), 225–259.
Lee, R. B. (1982). Politics, sexual and non-sexual, in an egalitarian society. In E. B. Leacock & R. B. Lee (Eds.), Politics and history in band societies, Cambridge (pp. 37–59). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leenhardt, M. (1979 [1947]). Do Kamo: person and myth in the Melanesian world. Chicago: University Press
Levinton, N. (2000). El superyo femenino. La moral en las mujeres. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
MacCallum, C. (1990). Language, kinship and politics in Amazonia. Man (New Series), 25, 412–433.
Midgley, M. (2004). The myths we live by. Londres/New York: Routledge Classics.
Ong, W. (1982). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word. Londres: Routledge.
Ortner, S. B. (1996). Making gender. The politics and erotics of culture. Boston: Beacon Press.
Ortner, S. B., & Whitehead, H. (Eds.). (1981). Sexual meanings: The cultural construction of gender and sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Politis, G. (2007). Nukak. Ethnoarchaeology of an Amazonian People. Walnut Creek: University College London Institute of Archaeology Publications.
Rival, L. (1999). Introduction: South America. In R. B. Lee & R. H. Daly (Eds.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of hunters and gatherers (pp. 77–85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rival, L. (2005). The attachment of the soul to the body among the Huaorani of Amazonian Ecuador. Ethnos, 70(3), 285–310.
Rival, L. (2007). Proies Meurtrières, Rameaux Bourgeonnants: Masculinité et féminité en Terre Huaorani (Amazonie équatorienne). In N.-C. Mathieu (Ed.), La Notion de personne femme et homme en dociétés matrilinéaires et Uxori-matrilocales (pp. 125–154). París: Ed. Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
Rogers, S. C. (1975). Female forms of power and the myth of male dominance. American Ethnologist, 2(4), 727–757.
Sanday, P. R. (1981). Female power and male dominance. On the origins of sexual inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scott, J. (1986). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. American Historical Review, 91, 1053–1075.
Seymour-Smith, C. (1991). Women have no affines and men no kin: The politics of the Jivaroan Gender Relation. Man (New Series), 26(4), 629–649.
Shlain, L. (1999). The alphabet versus the Goddess. The conflict between word and image. Nueva York: Penguin/Compass.
Siegel, D. J. (2012). The developing mind: how relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are. New York: Guilford Press.
Silva, M. (2001). Relações de gênero entre os Enawene-Nawe. Tellus, 1(1), 41–65.
Turner, T. S. (1979). The Gê and Bororo Societies as dialectical systems: A general model. In D. Maybury-Lewis & J. Bamberger (Eds.), Dialectical societies: The Gê and Bororo of Central Brazil (pp. 147–178). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vilaça, A. (2002). Making kin out of Others in Amazonia. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 8(2), 347–365.
Viveiros de Castro, E. (1992). From the enemy’s point of view. Humanity and divinity in an Amazonian Society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Walter, N. (2010). Living dolls: The return of sexism. London: Virago.
Zent, E.L. (2006). Morar en la selva: humanidad, prescripciones y seres hipostáticos entre los Hotï, Guayana venezolana (Working Paper N° 19). Latin American Studies Center, College Park, The University of Maryland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hernando, A. (2017). Relational Identity (or Identity When One Has No Power over the World). In: The Fantasy of Individuality. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60720-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60720-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60719-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60720-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)