Abstract
This chapter views the problems of realization of innovational potential of employees of industrial and scientific and technical sphere. Methodological basis for the research includes the works of foreign scientists in which two models of innovational behavior of employees are presented. The rational model is based on active participation of employees in innovational changes, which gives material profit to employee and company. The symbolic model of innovational development emphasizes the value of public recognition as a stimulus of innovational behavior.
The symbolic model of innovational behavior is applicable to modern Russian conditions. The authors pay attention to educational status as a factor of formation of innovational potential of employees of industrial and scientific and technical spheres. Based on the results of empirical research, analysis of influence of educational characteristics of respondents on the attitude to profession, ideas on prestigious employment, and participation in innovations is conducted.
The work was performed within the Project No. 383: “Employees of industrial and scientific and technical spheres in the conditions of monotown (by the example of sociological analysis of Tolyatti)”.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Astakhova А (2011) New age – new industrialization. E-source, Орen economy. Expert web-site of Higher School of Economics. http://opec.ru/1358949.html. Accessed 11 Oct 2015
Gamidov GS, Kolosov VG, Osmanov NO (2000) Foundations of innovative activities. Politekhnika, St. Petersburg
Gunin VN, Baranchev VN, Ustinov VА et al (2000) Management of innovations: 17-module program for managers “Management of organization’s development”. Module 7. INFRA-M, Moscow
Inozemtsev VL (1999) Science of person and society in post-industrial reality. Russ J Chem 6:110–122
Janssen O (2005) The joint impact of perceived influence and supervisor supportiveness on employee innovative behaviour. J Occup Org Psychol 78:573–579
Jong JPJ, Den Hartog DN (2007) How leaders influence employees’ innovative behavior. Eur J Innov Manage 10(1):41–64
King N, Anderson N (2002) Managing innovation and change: a critical guide for organizations. Thomson, London
Menshikova ОI (2006) Higher education as an element of formation of social and labor potential. Econ High Educ 4:65–63
Monusova GА (2008) Satisfaction with labor: inter-country comparisons. Glob Econ Int Relat 12:74–83
Nebrenchin S (2014) Security of Russia: engineering and technical personnel are of top-priority. Trade Ind Bull, 25 June 2014. http://www.tpp-inform.ru/official/4715.html. Accessed 15 Oct 2014
Polutin SV, Sedletskiy АV (2010) Analysis of innovational potential of the region. Reg Sci 2:110–116
Scott SG, Bruce RA (1994) Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Acad Manage J 37:580–607
Temnitskiy АL (2008) Motivation of intensive labor of industrial enterprise’s worker. Soc Res 11:13–23
Utkin EА (1996) Innovational management. AKALIS, Moscow
Vroom VH (1964) Work and innovation. Wiley, New York
West MA (1987) A measure of role innovation at work. Br J Soc Psychol 6:83–85
West VA, Farr JL (1990) Innovation at work. In: West VA, Farr JL (eds) Innovation and creativity at work: psychological and organizational strategies (63–80). Wiley, Chichester, pp 3–13
Yuan F, Woodman RW (2010) Innovative behavior in the workplace: the role of performance and image outcome expectations. Acad Manage J 53(2):323–342
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tsvetkova, I., Ivanova, T., Shirnina, E., Kozlovskaya, T. (2017). Factor of Formation of Innovational Potential of Employees of Scientific and Technical and Industrial Sphere. In: Popkova, E. (eds) Overcoming Uncertainty of Institutional Environment as a Tool of Global Crisis Management. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60696-5_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60696-5_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60695-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60696-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)