An Introduction to the Potential for Mobile eHealth Revolution to Impact on Hard to Reach, Marginalised and Excluded Groups

Part of the Human–Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)


eHealth is the use of technology to serve and promote health and wellbeing needs of a population. Mobile health is the use of wireless technologies to connect, communicate and promote this amongst different stakeholders within the population. This has great potential for improving the lives of all populations, especially those from traditionally marginalised or hard-to-reach groups, including those from developing countries, older people and those with chronic conditions for example. Mobile ehealth (mhealth) can link together healthcare practitioners and individuals better, provide information or offer feedback to improve self-awareness and manage health conditions individually and can offer games or challenges to encourage or motivate individuals to improve health. There are still concerns, however, that need addressing before mhealth can meet its potential, including, for example, security and privacy, information overload, emphasis on solving health issues rather than maintaining good health and not fully understanding how it fits into everyday lives of people, especially those not traditionally associated with technology such as older people. More research is needed on acceptability of such systems and developing standards and design and usability guidance. Overall mhealth can be seen as both enablers and disrupters, with the potential to revolutionise interactions people have about their own health but there is a need to reflect on the human and social issues surrounding such technology.


  1. De Schutter B (2010) Never too old to play: the appeal of digital games to an older audience. Games Culture 6(2):155–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Health Canada (2010) Ehealth. Available at Accessed 15 June 2017
  3. IJsselsteijn W, Nap HH, de Kort Y, Poels K (2007) Digital game design for elderly users. In: Proceedings of the 2007 conference on future play. ACM, Toronto, pp 17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Interactive Software Federation of Europe (ISFE) (2012) Videogames in Europe: 2012 Consumer Study. Retrieved from Accessed 15 June 2017
  5. International Telecommunications Union (2016 ICT facts and figures 2016. ITU, Geneva. Available at Accessed 15 June 2017
  6. Malone TW (1980) What makes things fun to learn? Heuristics for designing instructional computer games. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSMALL symposium and the first SIGPC symposium on small systems. ACM, New York, pp 162–169. doi: 10.1145/800088.802839
  7. Malone TW (1982) Heuristics for designing enjoyable user interfaces: lessons from computer games. In: Proceedings of the 1982 conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 63–68. doi: 10.1145/800049.801756
  8. Marston HR (2012) Older adults as 21st century game designers. Comput Games J Whitsun 1(1):90–102Google Scholar
  9. Marston HR (2013) Design recommendations for digital game design within an ageing society. J Educ Gerontol 39(2):103–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Marston HR, Graner-Ray S (2016) Older women on the game: understanding digital game perspetives from an ageing cohort. In: Nierling L, Dominguez Rue E (eds) Ageing and technology: perspectives from the social sciences. Transcript-Verlag, Bielefeld, pp 67–92Google Scholar
  11. Melenhorst AS (2002) Adopting communication technology in later life: the decisive role of benefits. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  12. Musselwhite C, Marston HR, Freeman S (2016) From needy and dependent to independent Homo Ludens: exploring digital gaming and older people. Games Cult 11(1–2):3–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nap HH, de Kort YAW, IJsselsteijn WA (2009) Senior gamers: preferences, motivations and needs. Geron 8(4):247–262Google Scholar
  14. Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2015) Annual mid-year population estimates for the UK. Available at Accessed 15 June 2017
  15. Rosser BA, Eccleston C (2011) Smartphone applications for pain management. J Telemed Telecare 17:308–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. United Nations (UN) (2015) World population ageing. United Nations, New York. Available at Accessed 15 June 2017
  17. Van Bronswijk JEMH (2006) Persuasive GERONtechnology: an introduction. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 183–186. Copyright ©2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vardeh D, Edwards R, Jamison RN, Eccleston C (2013) There’s an app for that: mobile technology is a new advantage in managing chronic pain. Clinical Updates, Pain, Dec, pp 1-7Google Scholar
  19. WHO (World Health Organization) (2005) Resolution WHA58.33. Sustainable health financing, universal coverage and social health insurance. In: Fifty-eighth World Health Assembly, Geneva, 16–25 May 2005. Resolutions and decisions annex. World Health Organization, Geneva. Available at Accessed 15 June 2017
  20. WHO (World Health Organization) (2016) Global diffusion of eHealth: making universal health coverage achievable. Report of the third global survey on eHealth. World Health Organization, Geneva. Available at Accessed 15 June 2017

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Innovative AgeingSchool of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea UniversitySwanseaUK
  2. 2.School of NursingUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaPrince GeorgeCanada
  3. 3.Health & Wellbeing Priority Research Area, School of Health, Wellbeing & Social Care, Faculty of Wellbeing, Education & Language StudiesThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations