Skip to main content

Empathy in Design: A Historical and Cross-Disciplinary Perspective

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering (AHFE 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 586))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

From a historical and cross-disciplined perspective, this paper reviewed the evolvement of empathy in philosophical aesthetics, sociology and psychotherapy. Three aspects of ambiguities about empathy were summarized, namely, affection and cognition, subject-oriented and object-oriented perspective, and attitude and ability, based on which a system of coordinates was created to indicate three pairs corresponding problems of empathy in design research and practice. Through this system of coordinates, the authors wanted to build a reference for designers and researchers to deeper understand the subtle nature of empathy in design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Chinese term ‘Gongqing’ means sharing emotion with others, while ‘Tongli’ refers to understanding the same.

References

  1. Mattelmäki, T., Vaajakallio, K., Koskinen, I.: What happened to empathic design? Des. Issues 30(1), 67–77 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Battarbee, K., Koskinen, I.: Co-experience: user experience as interaction. CoDesign 1(1), 5–18 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Leonard, D., Rayport, J.F.: Spark innovation through empathic design. Harv. Bus. Rev. 75(75), 102–113 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sanders, B.N., Dandavate, U.: Design for experiencing: new tools. School of Industrial Design Engineering Department of Industrial Design (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hunsdahl, J.: Concerning einfuhlung (empathy): a concept analysis of its origin and early development. J. Clin. Psychol. 3, 180–191 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pigman, G.W.: Freud and the history of empathy. Int. J. psychoanal. 76(Pt 2), 237 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lipps, T.: Einfühlung, inner nachahmung, und organumpfindungen (empathy, inner imitations, and sensations). Arch. für die gesamte Psychol. 2, 185–204 (1903)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Breithaupt, F.: Kulturen der Empathie. Suhrkamp, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Håkansson, J.: Exploring the phenomenon of empathy. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, pp. 1–140 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Titchener, E.B.: A text-book of psychology. Br. Med. J. 2(3268), 3285–3286 (1923)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Köhler, W.: Gestalt psychology. Psychologische Forschung 31(1), XVIII–XXX (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Piaget, J.: The Moral Judgment of the Child. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, London (1932)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Piaget, J., Elkind, D., Tenzer, A.: Six Psychological Studies. Random House, New York City (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mead, G.H.: Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Philos. Rev. 179(September), 272–273 (1934)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kohut, H.: Introspection, empathy, and psychoanalysis: an examination of the relationship between mode of observation and theory. In: Ornstein, P.H. (ed.) The Search for the Self, vol. 1, pp. 205–232. International University Press, New York (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rogers, C.R.: The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 60(6), 827–32(1957, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stotland, E.: Exploratory investigations of empathy 1. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 4, 271–314 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoffman, M.L.: The contribution of empathy to justice and moral judgment. Reach. Out Caring 47–80 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Batson, C.D.: The Altruism Question: Toward a Social-Psychological Answer. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wispé, L.: The distinction between sympathy and empathy: to call forth a concept, a word is needed. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50(2), 314–321 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ickes, W.: Empathic accuracy. J. Pers. 61(4), 587–610 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Davis, M.H.: Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 44(1), 113–126 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mehrabian, A., Epstein, N.: A measure of emotional empathy. J. Pers. 40(4), 525–543 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shamay-Tsoory, S.G., Aharon-Peretz, J., Perry, D.: Two systems for empathy a double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain A J. Neurol. 132(Pt 3), 617 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gladstein, G.A.: Empathy and counseling outcome:An empirical and conceptual review. J. Couns. Psychol. 6, 70–79 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bons, D.M.A., Scheepers, F.E., Rommelse, N.N.J., et al.: Motor, emotional and cognitive empathic abilities in children with autism and conduct disorder. In: International Conference on Methods and Techniques in Behavioral Research. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Visser, F.S., Kouprie, M.: Stimulating empathy in ideation workshops. In: Tenth Conference on Participatory Design, PDC 2008, Bloomington, Indiana, USA, October DBLP, pp. 174–177 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Silberstein, L.K.: Human-directed empathy and childhood history of pet ownership and attachment. Dissertations & Theses – Gradworks (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Greenson, R.R.: Empathy and its vicissitudes. Int. J. Psychoanal. 41 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  30. McDonagh, D.: Empathic research approaches to support the designer: a supra-qualitative research for designing model. Des. Issues (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Riess, H., Kelley, J.M., Bailey, R.W., et al.: Empathy training for resident physicians: a randomized controlled trial of a neuroscience-informed curriculum. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 27(10), 1280 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. MacIsaac, D.S.: Empathy: Heinz Kohut’s contribution. In: Bohart, A.C., Greenberg, L.S. (eds.) Empathy Reconsidered: New Directions in Psychotherapy, pp. 245–264. United Book Press, Baltimore (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Bozarth, J.D.: Empathy from the framework of client-centered theory and the Rogerian hypothesis, pp. 81–102 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Batson, C.D., Sager, K., Garst, E., Kang, M., Rubchinsky, K., Dawson, K.: Is empathy-induced helping due to self–other merging? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 73(3), 495–509 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Koppen, E., Meinel, C.: Knowing people: the empathetic designer. Des. Philos. Pap. 10(1), 35–51 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Steen, M., Kuijt-Evers, L.: Early user involvement in research and design projects - a review of methods and practices. In: 23rd EGOS Colloquium (European Group for Organizational Studies), 5–7 July, Vienna (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ho, D.L., Ma, J., Lee, Y.: Empathy @ design research: a phenomenological study on young people experiencing participatory design for social inclusion. CoDesign 7(2), 95–106 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mattelmäki, T.: Probing for co-exploring. CoDesign 4(1), 65–78 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Visser, F.S., Stappers, P.J., van der Lugt, R., et al.: Contextmapping: experiences from practice. CoDesign 1(2), 119–149 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Buchenau, M., Suri, J.F.: Experience prototyping. In: Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, pp. 424–433. ACM (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hargraves, I.: People matter: care in design and healthcare. Doctoral dissertation, School of Design, Carnegie Mellon University (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Battarbee, K., Koskinen, I.: Co-experience: user experience as interaction. CoDesign 1(1), 5–18 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kouprie, M., Visser, F.S.: A framework for empathy in design: stepping into and out of the user’s life. J. Eng. Des. 20(5), 437–448 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hua Dong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dong, Y., Dong, H., Yuan, S. (2018). Empathy in Design: A Historical and Cross-Disciplinary Perspective. In: Baldwin, C. (eds) Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 586. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60642-2_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60642-2_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60641-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60642-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics