Extended Field Trials of a Mixed-Reality Teaching Environment: Practical Issues Beyond the Technology

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 725)

Abstract

This paper reviews the results of a set of field trials on MiRTLE - the Mixed Reality Teaching and Learning Environment conducted at Saint Paul College. We report on some of the lessons learnt using the platform and its relationship to the underlying pedagogies.

Keywords

MIRTLE Virtual reality Mixed reality Essex university Saint Paul College Multi-user virtual environment (MUVE) 

References

  1. 1.
    Ben-Ari, M.: Constructivism in computer science education. J. Comput. Math. Sci. Teach. 20, 45–73 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Doll, C., McCaughlin, T.F., Barreto, A.: A recent review and evaluation. Int. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2(1), 131–149 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gardner, M., ODriscoll, L.: MiRTLE (Mixed-Reality Teaching and Learning Environment): from prototype to production and implementation. In: Workshop Learning Activities Across Physical and Virtual Spaces (AcrossSpaces), EC-TEL 2011 Conference, Palermo, Italy, 20–23 September 2011Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gardner, M., Scott, J., Horan, B.: Reflections on the use of Project wonderland as mixed-reality environment for teaching and learning. In: Proceedings of Researching Learning in Virtual Environments, pp. 130–141. The Open University, UK (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gardner, M., Scott, J., Horan, B.: MiRTLE. EDUCAUSE Rev. 43(5) (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jonassen, D.H.: Evaluating constructivist learning. J. Educ. Technol. 31(9), 28–31 (1991)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jonassen, D.H.: Designing constructivist learning environments. In: Reigeluth, C.M. (ed.) Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, pp. 217–239. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, Mahwah (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McDonald, J.K., Yanchar, S.C., Osguthorpe, R.T.: Learning from programmed instruction: examining implications for modern instructional technology. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 53(2), 84–98 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peña-Rios, A., Callaghan, V., Gardner, M., Alhaddad, M.: Experiments with collaborative blended-reality laboratory technology for distance learners. Published in the iLRN 2015 Prague Workshop, Short Paper and Poster Proceedings from the inaugural Immersive Learning Research Network Conference (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrovic, V., Jovanovic, K.: Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: a review. Comput. Educ. 95, 309–327 (2016). ElsevierCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Computer ScienceSaint Paul CollegeSaint PaulUSA
  2. 2.School of Computer Science and Electronic EngineeringEssex UniversityColchesterUK

Personalised recommendations