Advertisement

Immersive Learning as an Opportunity to Upgrade Learning Outcomes and Improving Skills in Political and Social Sciences

Conference paper
  • 859 Downloads
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 725)

Abstract

In recent years, new models and methods of learning and teaching have made their way into social sciences curricula, moving beyond STEM education in higher learning institutions. They can be considered as a complement to the classes. An interesting case is presented here for political science. Starting from the analysis of context and several experiments of immersive learning in the domain of political and social sciences, the authors report their own experience as teachers of the subject matter of “Elites and social movements” with BA students. This research corroborates conclusions from earlier studies and presents proposals that allow reflecting about the adequacy of new methods of teaching and learning to contexts of high exigency and training for new elite’s members.

Keywords

Political and social sciences Elites Pedagogical innovation Immersive learning Higher education Teaching 

References

  1. Ananiadou, K., Claro, M.: 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. In: OECD Education Working Papers, vol. 41 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/218525261154
  2. Archer, M.S.: Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer, M.S.: Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer, M.S.: Social Morphogenesis. Springer, New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asal, V., Blake, E.L.: Creating simulations for political science education. J. Polit. Sci. Educ. 2(1), 1–18 (2006). doi: 10.1080/15512160500484119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackburn, G.: Microlearning in learning and development: the digital industrial revolution, 16 February 2017. https://elearningindustry.com/microlearning-in-learning-and-development-digital-industrial-revolution. Accessed 8 Mar 2017
  7. Bonavides, P.: Teoria do Estado. rev. e ampl. Malheiros, São Paulo (2004)Google Scholar
  8. Brock, K.L., Cameron, B.J.: Enlivening political science courses with Kolb’s learning preference model. PS Polit. Sci. Politics 32(2), 251–257 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cairney, P.: Complexity theory in political science and public policy. Polit. Stud. Rev. 10(3), 346–358 (2012). doi: 10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00270.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Camacho, D.J., Legare, J.M.: Shifting gears in the classroom—movement toward personalized learning and competency-based education. J. Competency-Based Educ. 1(4), 151–156 (2016). doi: 10.1002/cbe2.1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dacombe, R., Morrow, E.A.: Developing immersive simulations: the potential of theater in teaching and learning in political studies. PS Polit. Sci. Politics 50(1), 209–213 (2017). doi: 10.1017/S1049096516002456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dahl, R.A.: A democratic paradox? Polit. Sci. Q. 115(1), 35–40 (2000). doi: 10.2307/2658032MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Damron, D., Mott, J.: Creating an interactive classroom: enhancing student engagement and learning in political science courses. J. Polit. Sci. Educ. 1(3), 367–383 (2005). doi: 10.1080/15512160500261228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., Hodgson, V., McConnell, D.: Exploring the Theory, Pedagogy and Practice of Networked Learning. Springer, Berlin (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dorn, D.S.: Simulation games: one more tool on the pedagogical shelf. Teach. Sociol. 17(1), 1–18 (1989). doi: 10.2307/1317920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duarte, A.C.: Cidadania e cultura política: estudo do orçamento participativo em Portugal (2000–2008). (Master Degree), Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas, Lisbon (2009). http://www.repository.utl.pt/handle/10400.5/3038
  17. EC. Education and Training 2020 Work programme Thematic Working Group ‘Assessment of Key Competences’ Literature review, Glossary and examples. EC Publishing, Brussels (2012). http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/repository/education/policy/school/doc/keyreview_en.pdf
  18. EC. Global Justice & Stability. Research & Innovation Projects. EC Publishing, Brussels (2016). https://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/project_synopses/ki-04-16-438-en.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none
  19. Elias, N.: Society of Individuals. Bloomsbury Publishing USA, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  20. Fox, R.L., Ronkowski, S.A.: Learning styles of political science students. PS Polit. Sci. Politics 30(04), 732–737 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frederking, B.: Simulations and student learning. J. Polit. Sci. Educ. 1(3), 385–393 (2005). doi: 10.1080/15512160500261236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung: #DigiKon15. The Digital Society. Impulses for the Digitalisation Congress. Division for Economic and Social Policy, Political Academy, Political Dialogue, Bonn (2016)Google Scholar
  23. Janta, B., Ratzmann, N., Ghez, J., Khodyakov, D., Yaqub, O.: Employment and the changing labour market: Global societal trends to 2030: Thematic report 5. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica (2015). http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR920z5.html
  24. Jones, K., Cunchillos, C., Hatcher, R., Hirtt, N., Innes, R., Johsua, S., Klausenitzer, J.: Schooling in Western Europe: The New Order and Its Adversaries. Springer, Berlin (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laver, M.: Playing Politics: The Nightmare Continues. Oxford University Press, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  26. Loasby, B.: Knowledge, Institutions and Evolution in Economics. Routledge, London (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Loggins, J.A.: Simulating the Foreign policy decision-making process in the undergraduate classroom. PS Polit. Sci. Politics 42(2), 401–407 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Michels, R.: Political Parties. A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. Batoche Books, Kitchener (2001)Google Scholar
  29. Mosca, G.: The Ruling Class. McGraw-Hill, New York (1939). Edited by A. LivingstonGoogle Scholar
  30. Nibbelink, L.G.: Radical intimacy: ontroerend goed meets the emancipated spectator. Contemp. Theatre Rev. 22(3), 412–420 (2012). doi: 10.1080/10486801.2012.690739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nield, S.: The rise of the character named spectator. Contemp. Theatre Rev. 18(4), 531–544 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. OECD: L’importance des compétences: Nouveaux résultats de l’Évaluation des compétences des adultes, Études de l’OCDE sur les compétences. OECD Publishing, Paris (2016). doi: 10.1787/9789264259492-frCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Omelicheva, M.Y., Avdeyeva, O.: Teaching with lecture or debate? Testing the effectiveness of traditional versus active learning methods of instruction. PS Polit. Sci. Politics 41(3), 603–607 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pareto, V.: The Rise and Fall of the Elites: An Application of Theoretical Sociology. Transaction Publishers, New York (1991). (H.L. Zetterberg, Trans.)Google Scholar
  35. Payerhin, M.: Have case, will travel: taking political science on (and off) the road. PS. Polit. Sci. Politics 36(3), 441–445 (2003). http://www.jstor.org/stable/3649254Google Scholar
  36. Portugal. Competências Digitais e.2030. Proposta para um programa integrado em competências digitais, para Portugal, 2017–2030 Governo de Portugal, Lisboa (2017)Google Scholar
  37. Sayer, A.: Method in Social Science: Revised, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, London (2010)Google Scholar
  38. Sayer, A.: Why Things Matter to People: Social Science, Values and Ethical Life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schaap, A.: Learning Political Theory by Role Playing. Politics 25(1), 46–52 (2005). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2005.00228.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schleicher, A.: Preparing Teachers and Developing School Leaders for the 21st Century: Lessons from Around the World. OECD, Paris (2012)Google Scholar
  41. Smith, E.T., Boyer, M.A.: Designing in-class simulations. PS Polit. Sci. Politics 29(4), 690–694 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith, K.: Why just two parties? A voting game to illustrate Duverger’s law. PS Polit. Sci. Politics 45(4), 759–764 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thomas, D., Brown, J.: A New Culture of Learning: Cultivating the Imagination for a World of Constant Change. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, Lexington (2011)Google Scholar
  44. Turner, B.: Rights and Virtues: Political Essays on Citizenship and Social Justice. Bardwell Press, Oxford (2011)Google Scholar
  45. Woodcock, P.: The polis of Springfield: the Simpsons and the teaching of political theory. Politics 26(3), 192–199 (2006). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2006.00268.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidade Aberta-CIDH, CEPESE/CLEPUL/CEMRILisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Universidade Aberta and Centro de Investigação sobre o Espaço e as Organizações, Universidade do AlgarveLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations