Abstract
The proposed state-region co-constitution model aids in understanding post-Soviet regional governance and its morphogenesis. The Conclusions summarise the replies provided for the original research questions, i.e., why regional organisations in the former Soviet space proliferate and why references to the regionals appears to be a recurrent, enduring feature in both post-Soviet politics and elites’ discourses and narratives, in spite of dysfunctional/ineffective regional organisations and the repeated failure of regionalist projects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bach Daniel (ed.). Régionalisation, mondialisation et fragmentation en Afrique subsaharienne. Paris: Karthala Editions, 1998.
Börzel Tanja A. and Vera van Hüllen (eds.). Governance Transfer by Regional Organizations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
Chappuis Fairlie, Deniz Kocak and Eric Sangar. “What’s African? Identifying Traits of African Security Governance”. Journal of Regional Security, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2014, pp. 7–30.
Coulon Christian and Denis Martin (eds.). Les Afriques politiques. Paris: La Découverte, 1991.
DiMaggio Paul J. and Walter Powell. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organisational Fields”. American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, No. 2, 1983. pp. 147–160.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Russo, A. (2018). Conclusions. In: Regions in Transition in the Former Soviet Area. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60624-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60624-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60623-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60624-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)