Advertisement

Recognizing Mine Site Hazards: Identifying Differences in Hazard Recognition Ability for Experienced and New Mineworkers

  • Brianna M. EiterEmail author
  • Jennica L. Bellanca
  • William Helfrich
  • Timothy J. Orr
  • Jonathan Hrica
  • Brendan Macdonald
  • Jason Navoyski
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 591)

Abstract

To perform a successful workplace examination, miners must be able to find and fix hazards. The goal of the current research project was to identify differences in how workers with varying amounts of work and safety experience search and identify hazards. The NIOSH research team created true-to-life panoramic images that safety professionals, experienced miners, inexperienced miners, and students searched for hazards. The effects of the image context and experience level of the participants on the overall accuracy are explored. The research findings suggest that safety experience and hazard familiarity play a large role in a miner’s ability to identify hazards. Findings from this study will be incorporated into training programs focused on improving hazard recognition ability for surface stone, sand, and gravel miners.

Keywords

Eye tracking Hazard recognition Virtual reality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

NIOSH would like to thank Holly Tonini for her help in taking and editing the panoramic images. The findings and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of NIOSH.

References

  1. 1.
    Mine Safety and Health Administration. Accident: Illness and Injury and Employment Self-Extracting Files (Part 50 Data). http://www.msha.gov/STATS/PART50/p50y2k/p50y2k.htm
  2. 2.
    Mine Safety and Health Administration: Examinations of working places in metal and nonmetal mines. Final Rule Fed. Reg. 82, 7680–7695 (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mine Safety and Health Administration: Definitions. In: Code of Federal Regulations. Title30, Part 56.2 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scharf, T., Vaught, C., Kidd, P., Steiner, L., Kowalski, K., Wiehagen, B., Rethi, L., Cole, H.: Toward a typology of dynamic and hazardous work environments. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 7(7), 1827–1842 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mitropoulos, P., Abdelhamid, T., Howell, G.: Systems model of construction accident causation. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 131(7), 816–825 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bahn, S.: Workplace hazard identification and management: the case of an underground mining operation. Saf. Sci. 57, 129–137 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Albert, A., Hallowell, M.R., Kleiner, B., Chen, A., Golparvar-Fard, M.: Enhancing construction hazard recognition with high-fidelity augmented virtuality. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 140(7), 04014024 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hunter, D.R.: Risk Perception and Risk Tolerance in Aircraft Pilots. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barrett, E., Kowalski, K.: Effective Hazard Recognition Training Using a Latent-Image, Three-Dimensional Slide Simulation Exercise. Report of Investigations, vol. 9527, pp. 1–36. Bureau of Mines, Washington, DC (1994)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Perlman, A., Sacks, R., Barak, R.: Hazard recognition and risk perception in construction. Saf. Sci. 64, 22–31 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burke, M.J., Scheuer, M.L., Meredith, R.J.: A dialogical approach to skill development: the case of safety skills. HRMR 17(2), 235–250 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Henderson, J.M., Hollingworth, A.: Eye movements during scene viewing: an overview. In: Underwood, G. (ed.) Eye Guidance in Reading and Scene Perception, pp. 269–293. Elsevier, Oxford (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oliva, A., Torralba, A.: The role of context in object recognition. Trends. Cogn. Sci. 11(12), 520–527 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kowalski-Trakofler, K.M., Barrett, E.A.: The concept of degraded images applied to hazard recognition training in mining for reduction of lost-time injuries. J. Saf. Res. 34(5), 515–525 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dupont, L., Antrop, M., Van Eetvelde, V.: Eye-tracking analysis in landscape perception research: influence of photograph properties and landscape characteristics. Landsc. Res. 39(4), 417–432 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Drury, C.G., Clement, M.R.: The effect of area, density, and number of background characters on visual search. Hum. Factors 20(5), 597–602 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Underwood, G.: Visual attention and the transition from novice to advanced driver. Ergonomics 50(8), 1235–1249 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stinson, C., Kopper, R., Scerbo, B., Ragan, E., Bowman, D.: The effects of visual realism on training transfer in immersive virtual environments. In: Proceedings of Human Systems Integration Symposium (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    FMCSA.: Physical Qualifications for Drivers. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 49, Part 391.41 (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    McWilliams, L., Lenart, P., Lancaster, J., Zeiner Jr., J.R.: National survey of the mining population, part I: employees. Off. Mine Saf. Health Res. Inf. Circ. 9527, 252 (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mine Safety and Health Administration: Training and Retraining of Miners Engaged in Shell Dredging or Employed at Sand, Gravel, Surface Stone, Surface Clay, Colloidal Phosphate, or Surface Limestone Mines. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 30 Part 46 (1999)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bellanca, J., Orr, T., Helfrich, W., Macdonald, B., Navoyski, J., Eiter, B.: Assessing hazard identification in surface stone mines in a virtual environment. In: Vincent, G.D. (ed.) Advances in Applied Digital Human Modeling and Simulation, pp. 217–230. Springer, Cham (2016)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Salvucci, D.D., Goldberg, J.H.: Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. In: Proceedings of the 2000 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications. ACM (2000)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hale, S., Myerson, J., Smith, G.A., Poon, L.W.: Age, variability, and speed: between-subjects diversity. Psyc. Aging 3(4), 407–410 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dzeng, R.J., Lin, C.T., Fang, Y.C.: Using eye-tracker to compare search patterns between experienced and novice workers for site hazard identification. Saf. Sci. 82, 56–67 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG (outside the USA) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brianna M. Eiter
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jennica L. Bellanca
    • 1
  • William Helfrich
    • 1
  • Timothy J. Orr
    • 1
  • Jonathan Hrica
    • 1
  • Brendan Macdonald
    • 1
  • Jason Navoyski
    • 1
  1. 1.Pittsburgh Mining Research DivisionCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and HealthPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations