Skip to main content

The Tightening Links Between Financial Systems and the Low-Carbon Transition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Economic Policies since the Global Financial Crisis

Part of the book series: International Papers in Political Economy ((IPPE))

Abstract

This chapter investigates the implications of the policy changes triggered by the Global Financial Crisis on the transition to a low-carbon society. The immediate effects have mostly been negative: national governments have retracted from public spending and fiscal support to clean technologies; new macroprudential regulation has discouraged banks from lending to low-carbon projects; monetary policies have perpetuated the high-carbon lock-in of the economic system. However, the transformed macroeconomic and institutional setting, together with the increased awareness of the links between financial dynamics and natural resources, has also created new space of opportunity for low-carbon investment and financing. New concepts and policy proposals have emerged, including the ‘green growth’ narrative, the idea of aligning macroprudential policy to climate objectives and the suggestion to use unconventional ‘Quantitative Easing’ monetary policies to support low-carbon investment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We will use the terms ‘green’, ‘sustainable’, ‘low-carbon’ and ‘climate-friendly’ in their broad sense and employ them as synonyms to refer to investment in all sectors involved in producing goods and services with a low environmental impact, or technologies that help to reduce the environmental impact of other sectors. A non-exhaustive list includes generation of electricity from renewable sources, energy efficiency in buildings, electric vehicles and low-carbon transportation, and waste and water management. While keeping a broad perspective, we will mainly focus on climate change, climate mitigation policies and renewable energy production.

  2. 2.

    Asset finance refers to ‘all money invested in renewable energy generation projects’; solar project with less than 1 MW are estimated separately and referred to as small distributed capacity (FS-UNEP and BNEF 2016, p. 10).

  3. 3.

    FS-UNEP and BNEF (2016) data include investments in solar, wind, biomass and waste-to-energy, hydropower projects of less than 50 MW, biofuels, geothermal, wave and tidal energies.

  4. 4.

    These include renewable energy, energy efficiency, sustainable transport, water and waste management, climate adaptation projects and others (CPI 2015).

  5. 5.

    Stock prices of a large number of companies operating in fossil fuel sectors have indeed been declining in recent years. However, this trend seems to have been driven mainly by the large drop in fossil fuel prices since 2014, which in turn has been determined by a mix of stagnating demand, abundant supply and geopolitical reasons (Baumeister and Kilian 2016).

  6. 6.

    The balanced budget principle was introduced in Article 81 of the Italian Constitution by Constitutional Law 2012/1, and in Article 109 of the Basic Law of Germany in 2009.

  7. 7.

    Central bank reserves are accounts that commercial banks hold at the central bank and use to settle interbank transactions.

  8. 8.

    National development banks include, to cite some of the largest, the China Development Bank (CDB), the German Kreditanstalt fur Wiederaufbau (KfW) and the Brazilian Banco Nacional do Desenvolvimento (BNDES). MDBs include the European Investment Bank (EIB), the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), the International Finance Corporation (IFC), the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and others.

  9. 9.

    The complete list of eligible supranational entities can be found at this link: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/mopo/implement/omt/html/pspp.en.html.

  10. 10.

    There are two types of capital base in MDBs: (i) paid-in capital (plus reserves and retained earnings) and (ii) ‘callable’ capital, guaranteed by governments in times of crisis. The share of paid-in capital has been gradually shrinking in all MDBs (Humphrey 2015); governments prefer to offer callable capital, as it doesn’t involve any actual budgetary disbursement.

References

  • Anderson, V. (2015). Green money: Reclaiming quantitative easing money creation for the common good. Brussels: Green/EFA Group in the European Parliament.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annicchiarico, B., & Di Dio, F. (2016). GHG emissions control and monetary policy. Environmental and Resource Economics. doi:10.1007/s10640-016-0007-5.

  • Antal, M., & Van Den Bergh, J. C. (2016). Green growth and climate change: Conceptual and empirical considerations. Climate Policy, 16(2), 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balint, T., Lamperti, F., Mandel, A., Napoletano, M., Roventini, A., & Sapio, A. (2016). Complexity and the economics of climate change: A survey and a look forward. Pisa: Sant’Anna School of Advances Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banque du Liban. (2010). Intermediate Circular 236. Banque du Liban.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. (2010). How is the global green new deal going? Nature, 464(7290), 832–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkawi, A., & Monnin, P. (2015). Monetary policy and green finance: Exploring the links. In IISD and DRC (Eds.) Greening China’s financial system. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batten, S., Sowerbutts, R., & Tanaka, M. (2016). Let’s talk about the weather: The impact of climate change on Central Banks (Staff Working Paper 603). Bank of England. Available at: http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/research/Pages/workingpapers/2016/swp603.aspx. Accessed 5 Dec 2016.

  • Battiston, S., Mandel, A., Monasterolo, I., Schütze, F., & Visentin, G. (2017). A climate stress-test of the financial system. Nature Climate Change. doi:10.1038/nclimate3255.

  • Baumeister, C., & Kilian, L. (2016). Understanding the decline in the price of oil since June 2014. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 3(1), 131–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BCBS. (2010). Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems. Basel: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.

    Google Scholar 

  • BCBS. (2013). Basel III: The liquidity coverage ratio and liquidity risk monitoring tools. Basel: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.

    Google Scholar 

  • BCBS. (2014). Basel III: The net stable funding ratio. Basel: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS. (2013). 83rd annual report. Basel: Bank of International Settlements.

    Google Scholar 

  • BNEF. (2017). Global trends in clean energy investment – Q4 2016 fact pack. Bloomberg: New Energy Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • BoE. (2016). Credit conditions review – 2016 Q4. London: Bank of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • BoE. (2017a). Consolidated market notice: Corporate bond purchase scheme. London: Bank of England. Available at: http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/markets/Documents/consolidatedmarketnotice170217.pdf. Accessed 24 Mar 2017.

  • BoE. (2017b). Funding for lending scheme, Bank of England. Available at: http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/markets/pages/fls/default.aspx. Accessed 24 Mar 2017.

  • Bowen, A. (2014). Green growth. In G. Atkinson, S. Dietz, E. Neumayer, & M. Agarwala (Eds.), Handbook of sustainable development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, A., & Dietz, S. (2016). The effects of climate change on financial stability, with particular reference to Sweden. Stockholm: Finansinspektionen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, A., Campiglio, E., & Tavoni, M. (2014). A macroeconomic perspective on climate change mitigation: Meeting the financing challenge. Climate Change Economics, 5(01), 1440005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruvoll, A., Már Baldursson, F., Kralik, S., & Vennemo, H. (2013). The financial crisis and fiscal consolidation in green budgets. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, S., Burrows, O., Godin, A., Kinsella, S., & Millard, S. (2016). A dynamic model of financial balances for the United Kingdom (Staff Working Paper 614). London: Bank of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldecott, B., & McDaniels, J. (2014). Financial dynamics of the environment: Risks, impacts, and barriers to resilience. Oxford: Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campiglio, E. (2016). Beyond carbon pricing: The role of banking and monetary policy in financing the transition to a low-carbon economy. Ecological Economics, 121, 220–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campiglio, E., Matikainen, S., & Zenghelis, D. (2017). Climate-related risks and financial stability: The impact of quantitative easing. London: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbon Tracker. (2013). Unburnable carbon 2013: Wasted capital and stranded assets. London: Carbon Tracker Initiative and the Grantham Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, M. (2015). Breaking the tragedy of the horizon–climate change and financial stability. Speech given at Lloyd’s of London by the Governor of the Bank of England. London: Bank of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBI. (2016). Bonds and climate change. The state of the market in 2016. London: Climate Bonds Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBRC. (2012). Notice of the CBRC on issuing the green credit guidelines. Beijing: China Banking Regulatory Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • CCST. (2015). Trends in private sector climate finance. New York: Climate Change Support Team (CCST) of the UN Secretary General.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceres. (2014). Investing in the clean trillion: Closing the clean energy investment gap. Boston: Ceres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerutti, E., Claessens, S., & Laeven, L. (2017). The use and effectiveness of macroprudential policies: New evidence. Journal of Financial Stability, 28, 203–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CISL. (2014). Stability and sustainability in banking reform: Are environmental risks missing in Basel III? Cambridge: University of Cambridge Institute for Sustainability leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coady, D., Parry, I. W., Sears, L., & Shang, B. (2015). How large are global energy subsidies? (IMF Working Paper WP/15/105). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. H. (2013, September). How have banks adjusted to higher capital requirements? BIS Quarterly Review, 25–41. Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • CPI. (2015). Global landscape of climate finance 2015. Venice: Climate Policy Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchlow, K. (2015). Irrational Apathy: Investigating behavioural economic explanations for the carbon bubble. Mimeo. London School of Economics and Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dafermos, Y., Nikolaidi, M., & Galanis, G. (2017). A stock-flow-fund ecological macroeconomic model. Ecological Economics, 131, 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, S., Bowen, A., Dixon, C., & Gradwell, P. (2016). “Climate value at risk” of global financial assets. Nature Climate Change, 6, 676–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EBA. (2016). EBA report on SMEs and SME supporting factor. EBA/OP/2016/14. London: European Banking Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECB. (2016a). Decision (EU) 2016/948 of the European Central Bank of 1 June 2016 on the implementation of the corporate sector purchase Programme (ECB/2016/16). Vienna: European Central Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECB. (2016b). Economic Bulletin. 3/2016. Frankfurt: European Central Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECB. (2017). The Euro Area Bank lending survey – fourth quarter of 2016. Frankfurt: European Central Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. J., Feldberg, G., & Lehnert, A. (2013). The history of cyclical macroprudential policy in the United States. Washington, DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRB. (2016). Too late, too sudden – transition to a low-carbon economy and systemic risk. Frankfurt: European Systemic Risk Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU. (2012). Treaty on stability, coordination and governance in the economic and monetary union. Brussels: European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Parliament. (2015). Monetary dialogue with Mario Draghi, president of the European Central Bank. Brussels: Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurosif. (2016). European SRI study 2016. Brussels: Eurosif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, J. D., Hepburn, C., Mealy, P., & Teytelboym, A. (2015). A third wave in the economics of climate change. Environmental and Resource Economics, 62(2), 329–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawley, B. W., & Neely, C. J. (2013). Four stories of quantitative easing. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 95(1), 51–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisari, G., Hervè-Mignucci, M., Micale, V., & Mazza, F. (2013). Risk gaps: A map of risk mitigation instruments for clean investments. Venice: Climate Policy Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • FSB. (2016). 2016 List of global systemically important Banks (G -SIBs). Basel: Financial Stability Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • FS-UNEP and BNEF. (2016). Global trends in renewable energy investment 2016. Frankfurt: Frankfurt School-UNEP Centre and Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • FT. (2015). FT Global 500. London: Financial Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2013). The impact of the financial–economic crisis on sustainability transitions: Financial investment, governance and public discourse. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 6, 67–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GFSG. (2016). G20 green finance synthesis report. Geneva: Green Finance Study Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • GIIN. (2016). Impact investing trends: Evidence of a growing industry. New York: Global Impact Investing Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • GNDG. (2008). A green new deal. London: Green New Deal Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobat, J., Yanase, M., & Maloney, J. F. (2014). The net stable funding ratio: Impact and issues for consideration (IMF Working Paper WP/14/106). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, A., Campiglio, E., Dawkins, E., & Kemp-Benedict, E. (2017). Climate financial bubbles: How market sentiments shape the transition to low-carbon capital. Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golosov, M., Hassler, J., Krusell, P., & Tsyvinski, A. (2014). Optimal taxes on fossil fuel in general equilibrium. Econometrica, 82(1), 41–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulder, L. H. (1995). Environmental taxation and the “double dividend”: A reader’s guide. In L. Bovenberg & S. Cnossen (Eds.), Public economics and the environment in an imperfect world. Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, S. (2011). Central Bank balances and reserve requirements (IMF Working Paper WP/11/36). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, D. (2001). Investor psychology and asset pricing. The Journal of Finance, 56(4), 1533–1597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, C. (2015). Challenges and opportunities for multilateral development banks in 21st century infrastructure finance. Seoul/Washington, DC: Global Green Growth Institute and The Intergovernmental Group of Twenty Four on Monetary Affairs and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA. (2015a). Energy technology perspectives 2015. Paris: International Energy Agency.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IEA. (2015b). World energy outlook 2015. Paris: International Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA. (2016). Key world energy statistics 2016. Paris: International Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2013). Unconventional monetary policies—Recent experience and prospects. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2014a). Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Working Group II – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2014b). Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Working Group III – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2014c). Climate change 2014. Synthesis Report. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. (2012). Green growth: Economic theory and political discourse (Working Paper 92). London: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy, A., & Vissing-Jorgensen, A. (2011). The effects of quantitative easing on interest rates: Channels and implications for policy (Working Paper 17555). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lander, E. (2011). The green economy: The wolf in Sheep’s clothing. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, T. (2017). Thermometer rising – climate change and Canada’s economic future. Remarks by the Deputy Governor of the Bank of Canada 2 March 2017. Montreal: Bank of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazard. (2016). Lazard’s levelized cost of energy analysis. Hamilton: Lazard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebreich, M., & McCrone, A. (2013). Financial regulation – Biased against clean energy and green infrastructure? White paper. Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C., Columba, F., Costa, A., Kongsamut, P., Otani, A., Saiyid, M., Wezel, T., & Wu, X. (2011). Macroprudential policy: What instruments and how to use them? Lessons from country experiences (IMF Working Paper WP/11/238). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, G., Yan, X., & Liu, X. (2013). China’s evolving reserve requirements. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 11(2), 117–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato, M., & Semieniuk, G. (2016). Financing renewable energy: Who is financing what and why it matters (SPRU Working Paper Series 12). Falmer: Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlade, C., & Ekins, P. (2015). The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C. Nature, 517(7533), 187–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeay, M., Radia, A., & Thomas, R. (2014). Money creation in the modern economy. In Quarterly Bulletin Q1. London: Bank of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinshausen, M., Meinshausen, N., Hare, W., Raper, S. C. B., Frieler, K., Knutti, R., Frame, D. J., & Allen, M. R. (2009). Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2°C. Nature, 458(7242), 1158–1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R., & Hines, C. (2010). Green quantitative easing: Paying for the economy we need. Norfolk: Finance for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narbel, P. A. (2013). The likely impact of Basel III on a Bank’s appetite for renewable energy financing (Discussion paper 10/2013). Norwegian School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassr, I. K., Wehinger, G., & Yokoi-Arai, M. (2016). Financial risks in the low-growth, low-interest rate environment. OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends, 2015(2), 63–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCE. (2014). Better growth, better climate – Synthesis Report. Washington, DC: The New Climate Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D., & Shrimali, G. (2014). Finance mechanisms for lowering the cost of renewable energy in rapidly developing countries. Venice: Climate Policy Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Fed. (2010). FAQs: MBS purchase program, Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Available at: https://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/mbs_faq.html. Accessed 24 Mar 2017.

  • Nyborg, K. G. (2017). Collateral frameworks: The open secret of central banks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Towards green growth. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). Putting green growth at the heart of development. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). Towards green growth? Tracking progress. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olbrisch, S., Haites, E., Savage, M., Dadhich, P., & Shrivastava, M. K. (2011). Estimates of incremental investment for and cost of mitigation measures in developing countries. Climate Policy, 11(3), 970–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PBC. (2013). China monetary policy report – quarter three. Beijing: Monetary Policy Analysis Group of the People’s Bank of China.

    Google Scholar 

  • PWMSP. (2011). Country report lebanon – Benchmarking of existing practice against EU Norms. Beirut: Paving the Way for the Mediterranean Solar Plan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J. (2014). FRB: Evaluating asset-market effects of unconventional monetary policy: A cross-country comparison. Federal Reserve Board. Available at: http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2014/1101/default.htm. Accessed 25 Aug 2016.

  • Romer, P. (2016). The trouble with macroeconomics. Commons Memorial Lecture of the Omicron Delta Epsilon Society, January 5, New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozenberg, J., Hallegatte, S., Perrissin-Fabert, B., & Hourcade, J.-C. (2013). Funding low-carbon investments in the absence of a carbon tax. Climate Policy, 13(1), 134–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan-Collins, J., Greenham, T., Werner, R., & Jackson, A. (2011). Where does money come from? (2nd ed.). London: New Economics Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan-Collins, J., Werner, R., Greenham, T., & Bernardo, G. (2013). Strategic quantitative easing: Stimulating investment to rebalance the economy. London: New Economics Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • S&P Global. (2016). Annual global project finance default and recovery study, 1980–2014. New York: S&P Global Market Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, T. S. (2014). Low-carbon investment risks and de-risking. Nature Climate Change, 4(4), 237–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schotten, G., van Ewijk, S., Regelink, M., Dicou, D., & Kakes, J. (2016). Time for transition-an exploratory study of the transition to a carbon-neutral economy (Occasional Studies 14–2). Netherlands: Netherlands Central Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scruggs, L., & Benegal, S. (2012). Declining public concern about climate change: Can we blame the great recession? Global Environmental Change, 22(2), 505–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. J. (2015). Irrational exuberance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Signorini, L. F. (2017). The financial system, environment and climate: A regulator’s perspective. Welcome address by the deputy Governor of the Bank of Italy. Rome: Bank of Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, N. (2017). Blindness to risk: Why institutional investors ignore the risk of stranded assets. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 7(1), 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1959). Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. The American Economic Review, 49(3), 253–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenschein, J., & Mundaca, L. (2016). Decarbonization under green growth strategies? The case of South Korea. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 180–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, T., & Stevenson, J. (2013). EU low-carbon investment and new financial sector regulation: What impacts and what policy response? (Working Paper 05/2013). Paris: IDDRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teulings, C., & Baldwin, R. (2014). Secular stagnation: Facts, causes, and cures. VoxEU eBook. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomä, J., & Chenet, H. (2017). Transition risks and market failure: A theoretical discourse on why financial models and economic agents may misprice risk related to the transition to a low-carbon economy. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 7(1), 82–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tienhaara, K. (2014). Varieties of green capitalism: Economy and environment in the wake of the global financial crisis. Environmental Politics, 23(2), 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turrell, A. (2016). Agent-based models: Understanding the economy from the bottom up. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin 2016Q4. London: Bank of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP. (2009). Global green new deal. Geneva: United Nations Environment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP. (2011). Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC. (2016). Report of the conference of the parties on its twenty-first session, held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015. Addendum. Part Two: Action taken by the conference of the parties at its twenty-first session. FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1. Paris: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villeroy de Galhau, F. (2015). Climate change: The financial sector and pathways to 2°C. Speech by the Governor of the Banque de France. Paris: Banque de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. D., Sutton, P. C., Werner, A. D., Costanza, R., Mohr, S. H., & Simmons, C. T. (2016). Is decoupling GDP growth from environmental impact possible? PloS One, 11(10), e0164733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED. (1987). Our common future. Geneva: World Commission on Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, E. U. (2017). Breaking cognitive barriers to a sustainable future. Nature Human Behaviour, 1. doi:10.1038/s41562-016-0013.

  • Werner, R. (2012). Time for green quantitative easing. Policy News 3/1. Southampton: Centre for Banking, Finance and Sustainable Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2012). Inclusive green growth: The pathway to sustainable development. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2016). State and trends of carbon pricing 2016. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xian, Z., & Liping, P. (2015). A framework for green finance: Making clear waters and green mountains China’s gold and silver. In IISD and DRC (Eds.) Greening China’s financial system. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Campiglio, E., Godin, A., Kemp-Benedict, E., Matikainen, S. (2017). The Tightening Links Between Financial Systems and the Low-Carbon Transition. In: Arestis, P., Sawyer, M. (eds) Economic Policies since the Global Financial Crisis. International Papers in Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60459-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60459-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60458-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60459-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics