Skip to main content

Back to the Future? UK Industrial Policy After the Great Financial Crisis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: International Papers in Political Economy ((IPPE))

Abstract

In the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) (2008), debates began to shift towards perspectives on the ‘rebalancing’ of mature economies with a particular emphasis on promoting more sustainable productive activities. In the UK, this led to an initial acceptance—among some policy-makers—that the state could in a positive way utilise ‘industrial policy’ to revitalise manufacturing. However, while some of the early industrial policy initiatives—such as the Automotive Council and the Catapults—have been promising, the Coalition and then Conservative government’s stance on industrial policy has been at best ‘muddled’ and at worst is often ‘empty rhetoric’. In this chapter, we explore and evaluate the role of UK industrial policy since the GFC, paying particular emphasis on initiatives at technological, regional and sectoral levels. We conclude with some suggestions for the future course of UK industrial policy, in the post-Brexit era, given the government’s recent green paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The comparative success of Japan is interesting. Japanese industrial policy was largely lauded for its role in developing a modern high-tech industrial economy, with the country nurturing prominent and (globally) successful national champions such as Toyota and Sony (Johnson 1982). This was largely achieved in an era when the Japanese state was able to exert close strategic control over its companies and industrial base. As (global) markets opened up, these ‘national champions’ began to increasingly move their operations off-shore, leading to concerns of a hollowing out of the country’s industrial base in the 1990s–2000s (Cowling and Tomlinson 2000, 2011b; Tomlinson 2002).

  2. 2.

    For further details of the EU Regional Development and Cohesion Funds and how these funds are allocated and programmes evaluated see http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/index.cfm/en/.

  3. 3.

    UK industry has long been over-reliant upon short-term (equity) capital, where there is an over-prevalence of investment incentives favouring short-term (equity) market movements at the expense of financing long-term investment, support for growing SMEs and long-term value creation (see Kay Review 2012, and also Sawyer 2015). The UK Treasury is currently undertaking a new review into patient finance which is being led by Sir Damon Buffini (The Telegraph, 21/11/2016).

  4. 4.

    Details from https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/innovate-uk/about (accessed 10/3/2017).

  5. 5.

    For further details, see https://catapult.org.uk/.

  6. 6.

    Available at: http://smartspecialisationhub.org/observatory/.

  7. 7.

    This section draws on Bailey et al. (2016).

  8. 8.

    At this point, it is worth mentioning the Coalition government (2010–2015) commissioned the Heseltine Review (2012), led by the Conservative peer, Lord Michael Heseltine, who has long been a champion of industrial policy . This report focused upon generating local growth (across the country) and among other things, called for a large £49 billion transfer of central government funding to a Single Local Growth Fund over a four-year period. While a number of small recommendations were accepted/partially accepted by the government, the Treasury largely blocked its major ambitions allocating just £2 billion for 2015/16 as well as in subsequent year of the 2015–20 Parliament (1/6th of that recommended) for local growth initiatives. The implementation has been described as ‘disappointingly timid’ (see Coffey and Thornley 2015).

  9. 9.

    As one leader of a combined authority stated to us in an interview, LEPs talk place but BIS talks sectors’.

  10. 10.

    Indeed, concerns have been raised that any deal with the USA is likely to be detrimental to UK interests. Tariffs are already low between the countries, and any deal is likely to give greater opportunities to US corporations to manipulate and expropriate contracts in UK public services, including the NHS.

  11. 11.

    Whether Dr Liam Fox, the International Trade Secretary, and/or David Davis, the Brexit Secretary, agree with this position is another matter.

  12. 12.

    Most recently the 2017 Budget committed £270m to supporting a range of disruptive technologies including driverless cars and battery technology (HM Treasury, 2017).

  13. 13.

    We are grateful for discussions with Lisa De Propris, Philip McCann and Paul Hildreth in relation to the points below in this sub-section.

References

  • Amison, P., & Bailey, D. (2014). Phoenix industries and open innovation? The midlands advanced automotive manufacturing and engineering industry. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(3), 397–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aranguren, M. J., Magro, E., & Wilson, J. R. (2016). Regional competitiveness policy evaluation as a transformative process: From theory to practice. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. doi:10.1177/0263774X16662469.

  • Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Automotive Council. (2012). Growing the UK automotive supply chain. The road forward – 2012 update. London: Automotive Council UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Automotive Council. (2015). Growing the UK automotive supply chain: The opportunity ahead. London: Automotive Council UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, E. (2016). Smart specialisation and data analytics. In Smart specialisation annual report (pp. 32–35). Available at: http://smartspecialisationhub.org/

  • Bailey, D., & Budd, L. (2017). The political economy of Brexit. London: Agenda Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D., & De Propris, L. (2014). Manufacturing reshoring and its limits: The UK automotive case. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(3), 379–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D., & De Propris, L. (2017). Brexit, UK automotive and implications for industrial policy. In D. Bailey & L. Budd (Eds.), The political economy of Brexit. London: Agenda Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D., & MacNeill, S. (2008). The rover task force: A case study in proactive and reactive policy intervention? Regional Science Policy and Practice, 1(1), 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D., Coffey, D., & Tomlinson, P. R. (2007). Crisis in Japan: State and industrial economy (224 pp.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar (Edited Volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D., Cowling, K., & Tomlinson, P. R. (2015a). Introduction. In D. Bailey, K. Cowling, & P. R. Tomlinson (Eds.), New perspectives on industrial policy for a Modern Britain (pp. 1–13). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D., Cowling, K., & Tomlinson, P. R. (2015b). An industrial strategy for UK cities. In D. Bailey, K. Cowling, & P. R. Tomlinson (Eds.), New perspectives on industrial policy for a Modern Britain (pp. 263–286). Oxford: Oxford University Press (Edited Volume).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D., Hildreth, P., & De Propris, L. (2016). Beyond ‘Localism’? Place-based industrial and regional policy and the ‘Missing Space’ in England. In D. Bailey & L. Budd (Eds.), Devolution and the UK economy. London: Rowman and Littlefield International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R., & Robert-Nicoud, F. (2007). Entry and asymmetric lobbying: Why governments pick losers. Journal of European Economic Association, 5(5), 1064–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy; a place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent report prepared at the request of the Commissioner for Regional Policy. D. Hübner. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barca, F. (2011). Alternative approaches to development policy: Intersections and divergences. In OECD (Ed.), OECD regional outlook 2011 (pp. 215–225). Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez, P. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, W. (2014). Shut out? South East Europe and the EU’s new industrial policy (LEQS Paper No. 84). LSE “Europe in Question” Discussion paper series. Available at: http://www.lse.ac.uk/europeanInstitute/LEQS%20Discussion%20Paper%20Series/LEQSPaper84.pdf

  • Bathelt, H., & Cohendet, P. (2014). The creation of knowledge: Local building, global accessing and economic development—toward an agenda. Journal of Economic Geography, 14, 869–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begg, I., & Mayes, D. (2000). Decentralised industrial policy. European Planning Studies, 8(2), 149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, G., Bailey, D., & Shutt, J. (2010). From RDAs to LEPs: A new localism? Case Examples of West Midlands and Yorkshire Local Economy, 25(7), 535–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. (1983). The ‘Keynesian Revolution’ in economic policy-making. The Economic History Review, 36(February), 103–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. J. (2002a). Kicking away the ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective: Policies and institutions for economic development in historical perspective. London: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. J. (2002b). Breaking the mould: An institutionalist political economy alternative to the neo-liberal theory of the market and the state. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26, 539–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopherson, S., & Clark, J. (2007). Remaking regional economies: Power, labor and firm strategies in the knowledge economy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimoli, M., Dosi, G., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2009). Industrial policy and development: The political economy of capabilities accumulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, D. (2015). Industrial policy: International experiences. In D. Bailey, K. Cowling, & P. R. Tomlinson (Eds.), New perspectives on industrial policy for a modern Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, D., & Thornley, C. (2015). Industrial policy: A green agenda. In D. Bailey, K. Cowling, & P. R. Tomlinson (Eds.), New perspectives on industrial policy for a Modern Britain (pp. 395–420). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cowling, K., & Tomlinson, P. R. (2000). The Japanese crisis: A case of strategic failure? The Economic Journal, 110(464), F358–F381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowling, K., & Tomlinson, P. R. (2011a). Post the ‘Washington Consensus’: Economic governance and industrial strategies for the 21st century. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35(5), 831–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowling, K., & Tomlinson, P. R. (2011b). The Japanese model in retrospective: Industrial strategies, corporate Japan and the ‘Hollowing out’ of Japanese industry. Policy Studies, 32(6), 569–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crafts, N. (2009). Transport infrastructure investment: Implications for growth and productivity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(3), 327–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, L., Balaram, B., & Lee, N. (2012). People or place? Urban policy in the age of austerity. London: The Work Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (1988). The welfare economics of knowledge production. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 4(4), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. (2014). Insights from international benchmarking of the UK and science innovation system. A Report by Tera Allas, BIS Analysis Paper No. 3. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/277090/bis-14-544-insights-from-international-benchmarking-of-the-UK-science-and-innovation-system-bis-analysis-paper-03.pdf

  • Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. (2015). Smart specialisation in England: Submission to the European Commission. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/436242/bis-15-310-smart-specialisation-in-england-submission-to-european-commission.pdf

  • Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G., Sampson, T., & Van Reenen, J. (2016). The impact of Brexit on foreign investment in the UK. Centre for Economic Performance (CEP), London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). Available at: http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/brexit03.pdf

  • Driffield, N., & Karolglou, M. (2016). Brexit and foreign investment in the UK. Available at: SSRN 2775954. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2775954. Retrieved on 05 July 2016.

  • Dunt, I. (2016). Brexit: What the hell happens now? Surrey: Canbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faggio, G., & Overman, H. (2012). The effect of public sector employment. LSE Research Laboratory. Available at: http://www.spatialeconomics.ac.uk/textonly/serc/publications/download/sercdp0111.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2017.

  • Foray, D. (2013). The economic fundamentals of smart specialization. Ekonomiaz, 83(2), 55–82. cuatrimestre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foray, D. (2015). Smart specialisation: opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41, 685–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froud, J., Johal, S., Law, J., Leaver, A., & Williams, K. (2011a). Knowing what to do? How not to build trains (CRESC Research Report). CRESC, Manchester University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froud, J., Johal, S., Law, J., Leaver, A. & Williams, K. (2011b). Rebalancing the economy (or buyer’s remorse) (CRESC Working Paper No. 87). CRESC, Manchester University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B., & Lerner, J. (2010). Financing R&D and innovation. In B. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook in economics of innovation (Vol. 1, pp. 609–639). Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hansard. (2011, March 23). Parliamentary proceedings column 966. Westminster, London. Available at: https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmhansrd/cm110323/debtext/110323-0001.htm#11032368000001

  • Hauser, H. (2010). The current and future role of technology and innovation centres in the UK. Report to Lord Mandelson, Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills. http://www.earto.eu/fileadmin/content/Website/Hermann_Hauser_Report_2010.pdf

  • Hauser, H. (2014). Review of the catapult network: Recommendations on the future shape, scope and ambition of the programme. Report for Vince Cable, Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/368416/bis-14-1085-review-of-the-catapult-network.pdf

  • Heseltine, M. (2012). No stone unturned: In pursuit of growth. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/34648/12-1213-no-stone-unturned-in-pursuit-of-growth.pdf

  • Hepburn, N., & Wolfe, D. A. (2014). Technology and innovation centres: Lessons from Germany, the UK and the USA. HalTech Report, Innovation Policy Lab, Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto. Available at: http://munkschool.utoronto.ca/ipl/files/2015/01/Technology-and-Innovation-Centres-Haltech-Report-2014_1.1.pdf

  • HMG (Her Majesty’s Government). (2017). Building our industrial strategy. Green paper. London: HMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Treasury. (2017). Policy paper. Spring budget 2017. London: H M Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth, P., & Bailey, D. (2013). The economics behind the move to ‘localism’ in England. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6(2), 233–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. (1971). The private and social value of information and the reward to inventive activity. American Economic Review, 61(4), 561–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, R. (2002). Changing industrial production systems and regional development in the New Europe. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 27(3), 262–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, W., & Lee, N. (2012). The city and the cities: Ownership, finance and the geography of recovery. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 5, 325–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPPR and the Northern Economic Futures Commission. (2012). Northern prosperity is national prosperity: A strategy for revitalising the UK economy. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese miracle: The growth of industrial policy, 1925–1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay Review. (2012). The Kay review of UK equity markets and long-term decision making. Department of Business Innovation and Skills, Crown Copyright. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/253454/bis-12-917-kay-review-of-equity-markets-final-report.pdf

  • Ketels, C. (2013). Recent research on competitiveness and clusters: What are the implications for regional policy? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6(2), 269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketovivi, M., & Ali-Yrkko, J. (2009). Unbundling R&D and manufacturing: Postindustrial myth or economic reality? Review of Policy Research, 26(1–2), 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitson, M. (2005). The American economic model and European economic policy. Regional Studies, 39(7), 987–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Los, B., McCann, P., Springford, J., & Thissen, M. (2017). The mismatch between local voting and the local economic consequences of Brexit. Regional Studies. Available at: 10.1080/00343404.2017.1287350

  • Luukkonen, T. (2000). Additionality of EU framework programmes. Research Policy, 29, 711–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato, M. (2013a). Financing innovation: Creative destruction vs destructive creation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(4), 851–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato, M. (2013b). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking the public vs private myth in risk and innovation. London: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, M. P., & Fornahl, D. (2010). Cluster life cycles – dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19, 205–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilès, R. (2015). Smart specialisation, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics. (2016). Quarterly economic statistics. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/

  • Overman, H. (2012, October 31). Heseltine’s report is a return to the unsuccessful. Financial Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overman, H. G., & Gibbons, S. (2011). Unequal Britain: How real are regional disparities? CentrePiece, 16(2), 23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, A., Marlow, D., McCarthy, A., O’Brien, P., & Tomaney, J. (2015). Local institutions and local economic development: The local enterprise partnerships in England, 2010. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(2), 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, G. P., & Shih, W. C. (2009, July–August). Restoring American Competitiveness. Harvard Business Review. Available at: https://hbr.org/2009/07/restoring-american-competitiveness

  • Pitelis, C. (2015). DIP-ly Speaking: Debunking ten myths, and a business strategy-informed developmental industrial policy. In D. Bailey, K. Cowling, & P. R. Tomlinson (Eds.), New perspectives on industrial policy for a Modern Britain (pp. 17–40). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryce, V. (2012). Britain needs a fourth generation industrial policy, Centre Forum. Available at: http://www.centreforum.org/assets/pubs/4gip.pdf

  • Rodrik, D. (2004). Industrial policy for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (2008). One economics, many recipes: Globalization, institutions, and economic growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez Graells, A. (2015). Public procurement and the EU competition rules, hart studies in competition law. Portland: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, M. (2015). Finance and industrial strategy. In D. Bailey, K. Cowling, & P. R. Tomlinson (Eds.), New perspectives on industrial policy for a Modern Britain (pp. 101–115). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Edited Volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • SMMT (Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders). (2015). 2015 automotive sustainability report. London: SMMT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoneman, P., & Vickers, J. (1988). The assessment: The economics of technology policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 4, i–xvi.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tausch, A. (2010). Titanic 2010?: The European Union and its failed Lisbon strategy (European Political Economic and Security Issues Series). Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Technology Strategy Board (TSB). (2013). Catapult programme: Progress update 2012–13. Swindon: North Star House. Available at: https://catapult.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Catapult-Programme-Progress-Update-2013.pdf

  • Tomlinson, P. R. (2002). The real effects of transnational activity upon investment and labour demand within Japan’s machinery industries. International Review of Applied Economics, 16(2), 107–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, P. R., & Branston, J. R. (2014). Turning the tide: Prospects for an industrial renaissance in the North Staffordshire ceramics district. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7, 489–507. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsu016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Financial Times. (2017, January 8). Theresa may indicates UK will leave single market. Financial Times Newspapers. London. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/6d28715a-d59a-11e6-944b-e7eb37a6aa8e

  • The Guardian. (2016a, February 18). UK productivity gap widens to worst level since records began. Guardian Newspapers. London. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/feb/18/uk-productivity-gap-widens-to-worst-level-since-records-began

  • The Guardian. (2016b, March 31). Current account deficit hits record high as GDP revised higher. Guardian Newspapers. London. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/mar/31/uk-economy-growth-record-trade-deficit

  • The Guardian. (2016c, May 11). UK industry falls back into recession. Guardian Newspapers. London. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/may/11/uk-manufacturing-sector-falls-back-into-recession-steel

  • The Guardian. (2016d, November 30). Greg Clark’s big reveal on ‘demeanour’ of Brexit negotiations strategy. Guardian Newspapers. London. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/oct/30/greg-clark-brexit-negotiations-andrew-marr-show-nissan-auto-industry

  • The Independent. (2014, August 3). Britain has taken longer to recover from the recession than at any time since the South Sea Bubble. Independent Newspapers. London. Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/britain-has-taken-longer-to-recover-from-recession-than-at-any-time-since-the-south-sea-bubble-9645218.html

  • The Independent. (2016a, September 29). How on earth would Labour raise £500 billion for its infrastructure spending? Independent Newspapers. London. Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/how-on-earth-will-labour-raise-500bn-to-make-britain-more-socialist-a7337651.html

  • The Independent. (2016b, September 29). If we sign up to the TTIP trade deal with Trump, the first thing to be sold off to US corporations will be the NHS. Independent Newspapers. London. Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/donald-trump-trade-deal-brexit-theresa-may-ttip-nhs-sold-off-american-us-corporations-a7531111.html

  • The Smith Institute and the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders. (2012). Give them some Credit! A survey of the barriers to funding the UK’s auto supply chain. London: The Smith Institute and SMMT.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Telegraph. (2016, November 21). Treasury turns to ‘patient capital’ to address shortage of support for British firms. Telegraph Newspapers. London. Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/11/21/treasury-turns-patient-capital-address-shortage-support-british/

  • Wade, R. (2009). From global imbalances to global re-organisations. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33, 539–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, P. (2016). Birmingham science city. In Smart specialisation annual report (pp. 20–21). Available at: http://smartspecialisationhub.org/

  • Warwick, K. (2013). Beyond industrial policy: Emerging issues and new trends (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No.2). OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willcocks, P. (2014, March 7). Smart specialisation in England; is this really Lepland? UrbanPivot. Available at: https://urbanpivot.com/2014/03/07/smart-specialisation-in-england-is-this-really-lepland/. Accessed 10 Feb 2017.

  • Williamson, J. (1990). The progress of policy reform in Latin America. In J. Williamson (Ed.), Latin American adjustment: How much has happened. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, D. A. (2011). Regional resilience and place-based development policy: Implications for Canada, paper presented to the Canadian political science association. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2009). World development report 2009: Reshaping economic geography. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. (2014). Making the UK a globally competitive investment environment. The wright review of advanced manufacturing in the UK and its supply chain. Available at: http://thewrightreport.net/report.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bailey, D., Tomlinson, P.R. (2017). Back to the Future? UK Industrial Policy After the Great Financial Crisis. In: Arestis, P., Sawyer, M. (eds) Economic Policies since the Global Financial Crisis. International Papers in Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60459-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60459-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60458-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60459-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics