Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction to Surrogacy: Historical and Present Day Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surrogate Motherhood Families

  • 779 Accesses

Abstract

The historical context and terminology used to fit unusual reproduction via surrogate motherhood into traditional models of the family are introduced in this chapter. Conflicting definitions are highlighted and attempts to minimise difference in favour of poorly working realities are shown not to be beneficial in the long term. Family differences have a legitimate place in society as evidenced by innovative fertility treatment options and solo, same-sex and older peoples’ lifestyle choices. The different types of surrogacy, reasons for using surrogacy and the major issues for those involved are discussed. Inequalities, human rights, exploitation and the commodification of children are also shown to exist. Although most of the research is concerned with psychosocial issues, this chapter also draws on research from related disciplines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Addelson, K. (1990). Some moral issues in public problems of reproduction. Social Problems, 37, 1–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2008). Surrogate motherhood. ACOG committee opinion no. 397. Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 111, 465–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, T. (2001). Surrogacy. Current Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 11, 256–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASRM. (2013). Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Consideration of the gestational carrier: A committee opinion. Fertility & Sterility, 99, 1838–1841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASRM. https://www.asrm.org/Templates/SearchResults.aspx?q=surrogacy&p=1. Accessed 18 Jan 2016.

  • Bartholet, E. (1993). Family bonds: Adoption and the politics of parenting. New York: Houghton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholet, E., Draper, E., Resnic, J., & Geller, G. (1994). Rethinking the choice to have children. The American Behavioral Scientist, 37(8), 1058–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. (2014). Altruism or egoism. In The altruism question toward a social-psychological answer (pp. 6–7). Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeson, D., Darnovsky, M., & Lippman, A. (2014). What’s in a name? Variations in terminology of third party reproduction. Paper presented at the International Forum on Intercountry Adoption and Global Surrogacy, The Hague: ISS (11–13 August) cited in: Cheney, K. (2016). Preventing exploitation, promoting equity: Findings from the International Forum on Intercountry Adoption and Global Surrogacy 2014. Adoption & Fostering, 40(1), 6–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bello, F., Akinajo, O., & Olayemi, O. (2014). In-vitro fertilization, gamete donation and surrogacy: Perceptions of women attending an infertility clinic in Ibadan, Nigeria. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 18(2), 127–133.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardes, J. (1993). Responsibilities in studying post-modern families. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn-Starza, A. (2016a, September 14). High court refuses single father’s application for a parental order. Bionews, p. 819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn-Starza, A. (2016b, May 23). Single father wins surrogacy human rights ruling. Bionews, p. 852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, E. (1994). “I wanted to be interesting. I wanted to be able to say ‘I’ve done something with my life’”: Interviews with surrogate mothers in Britain. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 12, 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, E. (1995). “Not a primrose path”: Commissioning parents’ experiences of surrogacy arrangements in Britain. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 13, 185–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, A., & Corson, S. (2002). A comparison of oocyte donors’ and gestational carriers/surrogates’ attitudes towards third party reproduction. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 19(10), 462–469.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brazier, M., Campbell, A., & Golombok, S. (1998). Surrogacy review for health ministers of current arrangements for payments and regulation. Report of the review team. Cm 4068. London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinsden, P. (2003). Gestational surrogacy. Human Reproduction Update, 9(5), 483–491.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • British Medical Association. (1990). Surrogacy: Ethical considerations. Report of the working party on human infertility services. London: BMA Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Medical Association. (1996). Changing conceptions of motherhood. The practice of surrogacy in Britain. London: BMA Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, C., & Edozien, L. (2014). Surrogacy in modern obstetric practice. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 19, 272–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carsten, J. (2004). After kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, T., & Sintrovani, P. (2008). Motives for parenthood, psychosocial factors and health in women undergoing IVF. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 26(1), 4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celebrities. (2016). http://www.therichest.com/expensive-lifestyle/lifestyle/18-celebrities-who-used-surrogacy/. Accessed 20 Jan 2016.

  • Cherry, M., & Peppin, J. (2005). Part I: North America, United States perspective on assisted reproductive technologies. In Annals of bioethics: Regional perspectives in bioethics (p. 34). Lisse: Taylor & Francis e-Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciccarelli, J. C. (1997). The surrogate mother: A post birth follow up study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Los Angeles: California School of Professional Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciccarelli, J. C., & Beckman, L. J. (2005). Navigating rough waters: An overview of psychological aspects of surrogacy. Journal of Social Sciences, 61(1), 21–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, K. (1985). Baby Cotton: For love or money. London: Dorling Kindersley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawshaw, M., Blyth, E., & van den Akker, O. B. A. (2013). The changing profile of surrogacy in the UK – Implications for national and international policy and practice. Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 2, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnovsky, M., & Beeson, D. (2014). Global surrogacy practices. ISS working paper series. The Hague: International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University, p. 54. Hdl.handle.net/1765/77402

  • Dhont, N., Luchters, S., & Ombelet, W. (2010). Gender differences and factors associated with treatment-seeking behaviour for infertility in Rwanda. Human Reproduction, 25, 2024–2030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dhont, N., van de Wijgert, J., Coene, G., Gasarabwe, A., & Temmerman, M. (2011). ‘Mama and papa nothing’: Living with infertility among an urban population in Kigali, Rwanda. Human Reproduction, 26(3), 623–629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dimka, R. A., & Dein, S. L. (2013). The work of a woman is to give birth to children: Cultural constructions of infertility in nigeria. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 17(2), 102–117.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, S. J., Abrahams, N., Mokoena, N. E., & Van der Spuy, Z. M. (2004). ‘You are a man because you have children’: Experiences, reproductive health knowledge and treatment-seeking behaviour among men suffering from couple infertility in South Africa. Human Reproduction, 19(4), 960–967.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, S. J., Abrahams, N., Mokoena, N. E., Lombard, C. J., & van der Spuy, Z. M. (2005). Psychological distress among women suffering from couple infertility in South Africa: A quantitative assessment. Human Reproduction, 20(7), 1938–1943.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, S., Mokoena, N., Maritz, J., & van der Spuy, Z. (2008). Motives for parenthood among couples attending a level 3 infertility clinic in the public health sector in South Africa. Human Reproduction, 23(2), 352–357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaither. (2015). Using a surrogate mother: What you need to know. WebMD. Retrieved April 6, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golombok, S. (1992). Psychological functioning in infertility patients. Human Reproduction, 7(2), 208–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanafin, H. (1984). The surrogate mother: An exploratory study. Ph.D. Dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology, Los Angeles, CA. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45(10-B), 3335–3336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanafin, H. (1999). Surrogacy and gestational carrier participants. In L. Hammer-Burns & S. C. Covington (Eds.), Infertility counselling (pp. 375–0388). Pearl River: Parthenon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, M. (1990). Psychological ramifications of surrogate motherhood. In N. L. Stotland (Ed.), Psychiatric aspects if reproductive technology. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinicke, C. M. (1995). Determinants of the transition to parenting. In M. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting, Status and social conditions of parenting (Vol. 3). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henaghan, M. (2013). International surrogacy trends: How family law is coping. Australian Journal of Adoption, 7(3), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • HFEA. (2008). Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act. Legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/22/contents. Accessed 25 May 2016.

  • HFEA. (2009). S1, 1.3. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/268039/surrogacy.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2016.

  • HFEA. (2013). Code of practice (8th ed.). London: HFEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • HFEA. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/fertility-treatment-options-surrogacy.html. Accessed 17 Jan 2016.

  • Hohman, H. H., & Hagan, C. B. (2001). Satisfaction with surrogate mothering: A relational model. Journal of Human Behaviour in the Social Environment, 4, 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornsey, K., Smith, N., Norcross, S., Ghevaert, L., & Jones, S. (2015). Surrogacy in the UK: ‘Myth busting and reform’. Report of the Surrogacy UK Working Group on Surrogacy Law Reform, Surrogacy UK, November 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act. (1990). London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act. (2016). Egg and sperm donation in the UK: 2012–2013. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/Egg_and_sperm_donation_in_the_UK_2012-2013.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2016.

  • Humphrey, M. (1977). Sex differences in attitude to parenthood. Human Relations, 30, 737–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. (2003). Global infertility and the globalization of new reproductive technologies: Illustrations from Egypt. Social Science & Medicine, 56(9), 1837–1851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics & FIGO. (2008). Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women’s Health. Surrogacy. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 102, 312–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, A. M. (1994). Living with contradictions: Controversies in feminist social values. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinpeter, C. B. (2002). Surrogacy: The parents’ story. Psychological Reports, 91, 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, V. (1994). Attitudes toward surrogate motherhood in Canada. Health Care for Women International, 15(4), 357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langridge, D., Connolly, K. J., & Sheeran, P. (2000). Reasons for wanting a child. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 18(4), 321–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasker, J. N., & Borg, S. (1987). In search of parenthood: Coping with infertility and high-tech conception (pp. 11–11). Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, N. (2008). Alternative kinship, marriage and reproduction. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37, 375–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marteau, T. (1989). The psychological costs of screening. British Medical Journal, 299(6698), 527.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Matetakufa, S. N. (1998). Our own gift. New Internationalist Magazine, 303, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miall, C. (1989). Reproductive technology versus the stigma of involuntary childlessness. Social Care Work, 70(1), 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millbank, J., Stuhmcke, A., & Karpin, L. (2016). Embryo donation and understanding of kinship: The impact of law and policy. Human Reproduction. doi:10.1093/humrep/dew297.

  • Ombelet, W., Cooke, I., Dyer, S., Serour, G., & Devroey, P. (2008). Infertility and the provision of infertility medical services in developing countries. Human Reproduction Update, 14(6), 605–621.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • OTA. (1988). Office of Technology Assessment. Infertility: Medical and social choices. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pannor, R., & Baran, A. (1984). Open adoption as standard practice. Child Welfare, 63, 245–250.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petitfils, C., Sastre, M., Sorum, C. P., & Mullet, E. (2017). Mapping people’s views regarding the acceptability of surrogate motherhood. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 35(1), 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poote, A., & Van den Akker, O. (2009). British women’s attitudes to surrogacy. Human Reproduction, 24(1), 139–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Postgate, J. N. (1992). Early Mesopotamia society and economy at the dawn of history (p. 105). Routledge. isbn:0-415-11032-7.

  • Purewal, S., & van den Akker, O. B. A. (2007). The sociocultural and biological meaning of parenthood. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 28(3), 79–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ragone, H. (1994). Surrogate motherhood: Conception in the heart. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenker, J. (1997). Infertility evaluation and treatment according to Jewish law. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 71, 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmulker, I., & Algen, B. (1989). The terror of surrogate motherhood: Fantasies, realities and viable legislation. In J. Offerman-Zuckerberg (Ed.), Gender in transition: A new frontier. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, B. (2006). Forensic considerations of surrogacy – An overview. Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine, 13, 80–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shenfield, F., Pennings, G., Cohen, J., Devroey, P., de Wert, G., & Tarlatzis, B. (2005). ESHRE task force on ethics and law 10: Surrogacy. Human Reproduction, 20(10), 2705–2707.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soundby, J. (1997). Infertility in the Gambia: Traditional and modern health care. Patient Education and Counselling, 31(1), 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiffler, L. H. (1991). Adoption’s impact on birthmothers: “Can a mother forget her child?”. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 10, 249–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. (2002). Still giving nature a helping hand? Surrogacy: A debate about technology and society. Journal of Molecular Biology, 319, 985–999.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Surrogacy Arrangements Act. (1985). London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangri, S., & Kahn, J. (1993). Ethical issues in the new reproductive technologies: Perspectives from feminism and the psychology profession. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24, 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. (2005). Making parents: The ontological choreography of reproductive technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, K., Dragonas, T., & Golding, J. (1992). The effects of psychosocial factors on the mother’s emotional well-being during early parenthood: A cross-cultural study of Britain and Greece. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 10(4), 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utian, W., Sgheenan, L., Goldfarb, J., & Kiwi, R. (1985). Successful pregnancy after in-vitro-fertilization-embryo transfer from an infertile woman to a surrogate. New England Journal of Medicine, 313, 1351–1352.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Balen, F., & Trimbos-Kemper, T. C. (1995). Involuntarily childless couples: Their desire to have children and their motives. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 16(3), 137–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Akker, O. B. A. (1998). Functions and responsibilities of organizations dealing with surrogate motherhood in the UK. Human Fertility, 1, 10–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van den Akker, O. B. A. (1999). Organizational selection and assessment of women entering a surrogacy agreement in the UK. Human Reproduction, 14(1), 101–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Akker, O. (2000). The importance of a genetic link in mothers commissioning a surrogate baby in the UK. Human Reproduction, 15(8), 1849–1855.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van den Akker, O. (2001). The acceptable face of parenthood: The relative status of biological and cultural interpretations of offspring in infertility treatment. Psychology, Evolution and Gender, 3, 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Akker, O. (2002). The complete guide to infertility. Diagnosis, treatment, options. London: Free Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Akker, O. B. A. (2003). Genetic and gestational surrogate mothers’ experience of surrogacy. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 21(2), 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Akker, O. B. A. (2005). A longitudinal pre pregnancy to post-delivery comparison of genetic and gestational surrogate and intended mothers: Confidence and genealogy. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 26(4), 277–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Akker, O. (2007). Psychosocial aspects of surrogate motherhood. Human Reproduction Update, 13(1), 53–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van den Akker, O. (2012). Reproductive health psychology (pp. 162–165). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Akker, O. B. A. (2016). Reproductive health matters. The Psychologist, 29(1), 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Akker, O. B. A., Camara, I., & Hunt, B. (2016a). Together … for only a moment’ British media construction of altruistic non-commercial surrogate motherhood. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 34(3), 271–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Akker, O. B. A., Fronek, P., Blyth, E., & Frith, L. (2016b). ‘This neo-natal ménage à trois’ British media framing of transnational surrogacy. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 34(1), 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddoups, S. (1991). Resistance to open adoption. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Social Work, University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddoups, J. (1994). Open adoption, human capital formation, and uncertainty. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 15(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warnock, M. (1984). A question of life: The Warnock report on human fertility and embryology. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Women & Health, Health Information and More. (2016). http://www.womens-health.co.uk/surrogacy-the-commissioning-parents.html. Accessed 23 May 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology, Middlesex University, London, UK

    Olga B. A. van den Akker

Authors
  1. Olga B. A. van den Akker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van den Akker, O.B.A. (2017). Introduction to Surrogacy: Historical and Present Day Context. In: Surrogate Motherhood Families. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60453-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation