Advertisement

“Student Zone” as a New Dimension of Learning Space. Case Study in Polish Conditions

  • Klaudiusz Fross
  • Dorota Winnicka-Jasłowska
  • Agata Sempruch
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 600)

Abstract

With the quick development of Information Technology, there occurred changes in the ways of knowledge acquisition. Its expansion influenced the new methods of studying and learning. It modernized the tools to support it as well. Students are looking for greater practical cognizance and experience. Progress of information network and work means related to flow of the information, carried weight on its simple acquisition. Activities, connected with the use of network and new forms of work, are forcing new functional and spatial relations and interactions in the university buildings. Nowadays, the process of gaining knowledge is taking place in different locations - not only in lecture rooms, but also in social links and electronically. With the support and through access to digital resources and mobile devices, learning can take place anywhere in many ways. These new trends have their reflection in the architectural spaces of universities. The paper describes a way to create a modern and innovative student zone on Faculty of Architecture, Silesian University of Technology in Poland. There were presented the following steps: an idea, schedule of the task, surveys carried out among students, student competition for interesting thoughts, creation of project team involving students, accomplishment of the project financing and implementation. Zone for student of architecture has a chance to become a model for the other faculties.

Keywords

Higher education University building Students’ space Learning space Teaching space Participatory design Qualitative research 

References

  1. 1.
    Fross, K.: Ergonomics in the practice of project architect on selected examples. In: Kurosu M. (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction. Theories, Methods, and Tools, Part 1, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on HCI 2014, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, June 22–27, 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8510. Springer, Cham (2014). ISBN 978-3-319-07232-6 (Print) 978-3-319-07233-3 (Online)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fross, K.: Architect-researcher as a model combination of research and design practice on examples, In: Charytonowicz, J. (ed.) Advances in Human Factors and Sustainable Infrastructure, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics AHFE 2014, Kraków, Poland, 19–23 July 2014, Las Vegas (2014). ISBN 978-1-4951-2092-3Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fross, K., Sempruch, A.: The qualitative research for the architectural design and evaluation of completed buildings. Part 1 – basic principles and methodology. Archit. Civ. Eng. Environ. 8(3), 13–19 (2015). Silesian University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fross, K., Sempruch, A.: The qualitative research for the architectural design and evaluation of completed buildings. Part 2 – examples of accomplished research. Archit. Civ. Eng. Environ. 8(3), 21–28 (2015). Silesian University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fross, K., Winnicka-Jasłowska, D., Gumińska, A., Masły, D., Sitek, M.: Use of qualitative research in architectural design and evaluation of the built environment. In: AHFE – HFSI 2015, Session: Ergonomical Evaluation in Architecture, Las Vegas (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neuman D.J.: Building Type Basics for College and University Facilities. Kliment, S.A., Series Founder (ed.) Wiley, New York (2003) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Winnicka-Jasłowska, D.: Creating a functional and space program for new building of the faculty of the biomedical engineering building, Silesian University of Technology. Archit. Civ. Eng. Environ. 5(3), 41–50 (2012). Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, GliwiceGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Winnicka-Jasłowska, D.: Ergonomic solutions of facilities and laboratory work-stands at universities. programming of ergonomic technological lines – case study. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Part 4, Design for All and Accessibility Practice, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on UAHCI 2014, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 22–27 June 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8516. Springer, Cham (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Winnicka-Jasłowska, D.: Quality analysis of polish universities based on poe method - description of research experiences. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) Access to Learning, Health and Well-Being, Part 3, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on UAHCI 2015, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2–7 August 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9177. Springer, Cham (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Winnicka-Jasłowska, D.: Badania naukowe w projektowaniu ergonomicznych miejsc pracy w przestrzeniach akademickich. Studium przypadku. [w:] Charytonowicz, J. (red.): Zastosowania ergonomii. Wybrane kierunki badań ergonomicznych w 2015 roku. Wydawnictwo PTErg o/Wrocław, Wrocław (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Winnicka-Jasłowska, D.: Przestrzeń nauki współczesnego uniwersytetu. Rola badań przedprojektowych w programowaniu nowych funkcji wyższych uczelni.(The learning space of a contemporary university. The role of pre-design research in the programming of new functions of universities.) Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, Gliwice (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaudiusz Fross
    • 1
  • Dorota Winnicka-Jasłowska
    • 1
  • Agata Sempruch
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of ArchitectureSilesian University of TechnologyGliwicePoland

Personalised recommendations