Skip to main content

An Integration of Cognitive Task Analysis Results for Situation Awareness-Focused Training Program Development

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems (AHFE 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 595))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1795 Accesses

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop an approach for translation of cognitive task analysis (CTA) results to training program content for operators of high throughput screening (HTS) systems. Currently, no standardized methods exist for translating outcomes of multiple CTA methods to support training program design and promote situation awareness (SA). We combined information requirements from a goal-directed task analysis (GDTA) and system resource requirements from abstraction hierarchy (AH) models to establish content on HTS processes and to address three levels of operator SA. The two electronic forms of training were compared with on-the-job (OTJ) training. Results provided preliminary evidence that CTA-based training increased operator knowledge beyond OTJ training and increased SA-related knowledge beyond operator initial system knowledge. A set of general guidelines was developed for design of CTA-based training programs, including methods for structuring components of the training program to support SA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cohen, S., Trinka, K.: High-throughput screening. In: Janzen, W.P. (ed.) High Throughput Screening: Methods and Protocols, pp. 213–228. Humana Press, Totowa (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Hamilton, S.: Introduction to screening automation. In: Janzen, W.P. (ed.) High Throughput Screening: Methods and Protocols, pp. 169–193. Humana Press, Totowa (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Endsley, M.R.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors 37(1), 32–64 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Clark, R.E., Feldon, D., van Merriënboer, J., Yates, K., Early, S.: Cognitive task analysis. In: Spector, J.M., Merrill, M.D., van Merriënboer, J.J.G., Driscoll, M.P. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3rd edn., pp. 577–593. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Endsley, M.R.: A survey of situation awareness requirements in air-to-air combat fighters. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 3(2), 157–168 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Endsley, M.R., Robertson, M.M.: Training for situation awareness in individuals and teams. In: Endsley, M.R., Garland, D.J. (eds.) Situation Awareness: Analysis and Measurement, pp. 349–366. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bisantz, A.M., Vicente, K.J.: Making the abstraction hierarchy concrete. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 40, 83–117 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaber, D.B., Segall, N., Green, R.S., Entzian, K., Junginger, S.: Using multiple cognitive task analysis methods for supervisory control interface design in high-throughput biological screening processes. Int. J. Cogn. Technol. Work 8, 237–252 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gagne, R.M., Briggs, L.J., Wager, W.W. (eds.): Analysis of the learning task. In: Principles of Instructional Design, pp. 145–164. Harcort Brace College Publishers, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meyer, R.E., Moreno, R.: Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learn. Instr. 12, 107–119 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lohr, L.L.: Designing the instructional interface. Comput. Hum. Behav. 16, 161–182 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jonassen, D.H., Tessmer, M., Hannum, W.H.: Task Analysis Methods for Instructional Design. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haladyna, T.M.: Developing and Validating Multiple-Choice Test Items, pp. 125–141. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A National Science Foundation (NSF) Information Technology Research Grant (no. 046852) supported this research. Ephraim Glinert was the technical monitor for the NSF. The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. We thank the University of Rostock and the Center for Life Science Automation for providing us with access to high-throughput biological screening systems and supporting the research through allocation of biopharmacologist time.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manida Swangnetr .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kaber, D.B., Green, R.S., Swangnetr, M. (2018). An Integration of Cognitive Task Analysis Results for Situation Awareness-Focused Training Program Development. In: Chen, J. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 595. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60384-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60384-1_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60383-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60384-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics