Skip to main content

University Leaders Responsibilities in Carrying New Programs into Practice

  • 1989 Accesses

Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC,volume 594)

Abstract

Responsible leadership is a topic that is still under research. The complexity of the issue requires deeper involvement of researchers. Playing the role of a university leader imposes the duty of being responsible. Leaders should be responsible not only towards the stakeholders of the organization they manage, but also for the expected results of the actions predicted by the institution itself. It is noteworthy that there exists an empirically proved relationship between the quality of school leadership and student achievement. Building a professional community of teachers is the key to improve students’ achievements. Results of newly implemented programs should be duly assessed by universities. The conclusions should be then discussed and the feedback should influence future changes in programs. It means that every activity of a responsible university leader should be focused primarily on stakeholders’ needs. The article was based on an analysis of the literature.

Keywords

  • Leadership
  • University
  • Curriculum
  • Social responsibility
  • Management

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-60372-8_33
  • Chapter length: 8 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   269.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-60372-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   349.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

References

  1. Pless, N.M., Maak, T.: Responsible leadership: pathways to the future. J. Bus. Ethics 98, 3–13 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Pless, N.M., Maak, T., Waldman, D.A.: Different approaches toward doing the right thing: mapping the responsibility orientations of leaders. Acad. Manage. Perspect. 26, 51–65 (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Pless, N.M., Maak, T., Stahl, G.K.: Promoting corporate social responsibility and sustainable development through management development: what can be learned from international service learning programs? Hum. Resour. Manage. 51(6), 873–904 (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Maak, T.: Responsible leadership, stakeholder engagement, and the emergence of social capital. J. Bus. Ethics 74, 329–343 (2007)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Balkundi, P., Kilduff, M.: The ties that lead: a social network approach to leadership. Leadersh. Q. 16, 941–961 (2005)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Ayios, A., Jeurissen, R., Manning, P., Spence, L.J.: Social capital: a review from an ethics perspective. Bus. Ethics Eur. Rev. 23(1), 108–124 (2014)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Painter-Morland, M.: Systemic leadership and the emergence of ethical responsiveness. J. Bus. Ethics 82, 509–524 (2008)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. The Wallace Foundation: The School Principal as Leader: Going Schools to Better Teaching and Learning, pp. 1–26 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mazzeo, C.: Frameworks of state: assessment policy in historical perspective. Teach. College Rec. 103, 367–398 (2001)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Freeman Jr., S., Kochan, F.: The role of assessment and accountability in higher education doctoral programs: a presidential perspective. Int. J. Educ. Leadersh. Prep. 7(2), 1–13 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Razavi, S.M., Safari, H., Shafie, H.: Relationships among service quality, customer satisfaction and customer perceived value: evidence from Iran’s software industry. J. Manage. Strat. 3(3), 28–37 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zeithaml, V.A., Bitner, M.J.: Services Marketing: Integrating Customer Focus Across the Firm, 7th edn. New York, McGraw-Hill (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rayner, S., Fuller, M., McEwen, L., Roberts, H.: Managing leadership in the UK university: a case for researching the missing professoriate? Stud. High. Educ. 35(6), 617–631 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tight, M.: What does it mean to be a professor? High. Educ. Rev. 34, 15–31 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Želvys, R.: Švietimo organizacijų vadyba, p. 8. VU leidykla, Vilnius (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Scott, P.: The changing role of the university in the production of new knowledge. Tert. Educ. Manage. 3(1), 5–14 (1997)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. Brown, F.W., Moshavi, D.: Herding academic cats: faculty reactions to transformational and contingent reward leadership by department chairs. J. Leadersh. Stud. 8(3), 79–94 (2002)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. Cragg, W.: Business ethics and stakeholder theory. Bus. Ethics Q. 12(2), 113–142 (2002)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  19. Koehn, D., Ueng, J.: Evaluating the evaluators: should investors trust corporate governance metrics ratings? J. Manage. Gov. 9, 111–128 (2005)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  20. Huba, M.E., Freed, J.E.: Learning-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting the Focus from Teaching to Learning. Allyn and Bacon, Boston (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Donaldson, T., Preston, L.E.: The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad. Manage. Rev. 20(1), 65–91 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Spence, L.J., Coles, A.-M., Harris, L.: The forgotten stakeholder? Ethics and social responsibility in relation to competitors. Bus. Soc. Rev. 106(4), 331–352 (2001)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  23. Ross, J., Winchell, W.O.: Production and Quality. American Society for Quality, Milwaukee (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Crosby, P.B.: Quality is Free. Mentor/NewAmerican Library, New York (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jacques, M.L.: The call of quality: doing right things right. Qual. Prog. 32(9), 48–54 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Petrick, J.A., Manning, G.E.: Paradigm shifts in quality management and ethics development. Bus. Forum 18(4), 15–17 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nayebpour, M.R., Koehn, D.: The ethics of quality: problems and preconditions. J. Bus. Ethics 44(1), 37–48 (2003)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee, L.-S., Ko, H.-M., Wang, M.-T., Pan, Y.-J.: Assessing the quality of the business and management education in higher education. Bus. Econ. Res. 1–10 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Adler, P.S., Kwon, S.-W.: Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Acad. Manage. Rev. 27(1), 17–40 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Portes, A.: Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 24, 1–24 (1998)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  31. Cannon, J.P., Perreault Jr., W.D.: Buyer–seller relationships in business markets. J. Mark. Res. 36, 439–460 (1999)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  32. Jap, S.D., Ganesan, S.: Control mechanisms and the relationship life cycle: Implications for safeguarding specific investments and developing commitment. J. Mark. Res. 37, 227–245 (2000)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  33. Levinson, H.: Wither academia? Psychol. Manage. J. 13(4), 210–222 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  34. http://www.uin-malang.ac.id

  35. Abidin, M.: Higher education quality: perception differences among internal and external stakeholders. Int. Educ. Stud. 8(12), 185–192 (2015)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  36. Boyle, A., Abdullah, A.: Factors influencing engagement with higher education pathway programs. J. Dev. Arts 49(5), 169–182 (2015). Special Issue on Kuala Lumpur Conference Held in August 2014

    Google Scholar 

  37. ACTA: American Council of Trustees and Alumni: Implementing Governance of NEW ERA. An Action Plan for Higher Education Trustees. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED553424.pdf

  38. Freeman, S., Kochan, F.: The role of assessment and accountability in higher education doctoral programs: a presidential perspective. Int. J. Educ. Leadersh. Prep. 7(2), 1–3 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcin Geryk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Geryk, M. (2018). University Leaders Responsibilities in Carrying New Programs into Practice. In: Kantola, J., Barath, T., Nazir, S. (eds) Advances in Human Factors, Business Management and Leadership. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 594. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60372-8_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60372-8_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60371-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60372-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)