The Indirect Impacts of Wind Farms on Terrestrial Mammals: Insights from the Disturbance and Exclusion Effects on Wolves (Canis lupus)

  • Gonçalo Ferrão da Costa
  • João Paula
  • Francisco Petrucci-Fonseca
  • Francisco Álvares
Chapter

Abstract

Due to the technical and functional characteristics of wind turbines, impact assessment studies have focused mainly on flying vertebrates. Nevertheless, evidence from the little available knowledge indicates potential impacts on large terrestrial mammals resulting from habitat fragmentation and increasing human disturbance. Over the last 15 years, more than 900 wind turbines were built inside the range of the Portuguese wolf. Due to the endangered status of this large carnivore in Portugal, several monitoring plans were conducted, resulting in a reasonable amount of information being collected on the effects of wind farms on wolves. We reviewed the methodological approaches, compiled major findings and summarised the mitigation/compensation measures used in Portuguese wind farms. The overall outcomes show increasing human disturbance in wind farm areas, resulting in lower wolf reproduction rates during construction and the first years of operation, as well as shifts in denning site locations of more than 2.5 km away from the wind farm. These findings are of major concern in humanised landscapes, where suitable wolf breeding habitats are reduced. As precautionary measure, new wind farm projects should be restricted in areas that are closer than 2 km from known wolf denning locations.

Keywords

Breeding site location Human disturbance Large carnivores Reproduction rate Wind farm road traffic 

References

  1. Agha, M., Lovich, J. E., Ennen, J. R., Augustine, B., Arundel, T. R., & Murphy, M. O. et al. (2015). Turbines and terrestrial vertebrates: Variation in tortoise survivorship between a wind energy facility and an adjacent undisturbed wildland area in the desert southwest (USA). Environmental Management, 56(2), 332–341. doi:10.1007/s00267-015-0498-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Álvares, F., Barroso, I., Blanco, J.C., Cortés, Y., Costa, G., Llaneza, L., Moreira, L., Nascimento, J., Palacios, V., Petrucci-Fonseca, F., Pimenta, V., Roque, S. & Santos, E. (2005). Wolf status and conservation in the Iberian Peninsula. International Congress Frontiers of Wolf Recovery, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA, October 1–4, 2005.Google Scholar
  3. Álvares, F., Barroso, I., Costa, G., Espírito-Santo, C., Fonseca, C., & Godinho, R. et al. (2015). Situação de referência para o Plano de Ação para a Conservação do Lobo-ibérico em Portugal. [Reference situation for the Wolf Conservation Action Plan in Portugal]. ICNF/CIBIO-INBIO/CE3C/UA, Lisboa, 70 pp (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  4. Álvares, F., H. Rio-Maior, S. Roque, M. Nakamura & F. Petrucci-Fonseca (2017). Ecological response of breeding wolves to wind farms: Insights from two case studies in Portugal. In M. R. Perrow (Ed.), Wildlife and wind farms: Conflicts and solutions. Volume 1: Onshore. -Volume 1: Onshore: 432 (pp. 225–227). Pelagic Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Álvares, F., H. Rio-Maior, S. Roque, M. Nakamura, D. Cadete, S. Pinto & F. Petrucci-Fonseca (2011). Assessing ecological responses of wolves to wind power plants in Portugal: Methodological constraints and conservation implications. In Abstracts of CWW2011—conference on wind energy and wildlife impacts, Trondheim, Norway, May 2–5, 2011Google Scholar
  6. Álvares, F., Petrucci-Fonseca, F. & Pereira, E. (2000). O lobo no Parque Internacional Gerês-Xurés—Situação populacional e perspectivas de conservação [The wolf at Gerês-Xurês International Park]. Galemys, 12, 223–240.Google Scholar
  7. APREN. (2017). Technical data. http://www.apren.pt/en/. Accessed February 20, 2017.
  8. Baerwald, E. F., & Barclay, R. M. R. (2009). Geographic variation in activity and fatality of migratory bats at wind energy facilities. Journal of Mammalogy, 90(6), 1341–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berger, J. (2007). Fear, human shields and the redistribution of prey and predators in protected areas. Biology Letters, 3, 620–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blanco, J. C., & Cortés, Y. (2012). Surveying wolves without snow: A critical review of the methods used in Spain. Hytrix, 23, 35–48.Google Scholar
  11. Boitani, L., & Ciucci, P. (2009). Wolf management across Europe: Species conservation without boundaries. In M. Musiani, L. Boitani, & P. C. Paquet (Eds.), A new era for wolves and people: Wolf recovery, human attitudes, and policy (pp. 15–39). Calgary, Canada: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
  12. Brotas, G., Oliveira, J. M., & Loureiro, C. (2015). Wind farms and a compensatory programme for the Iberian Wolf in Portugal: Seven years of analysis. In Abstracts of CWW2015—Conference on Wind Energy and Wildlife Impacts. Berlin, Germany, 10–12 March 2015.Google Scholar
  13. Cabral, M. J., Almeida, J., Almeida, P. R., Dellinger, T., Ferrand de Almeida, N., & Oliveira, M. E. (2006). Livro Vermelho dos Vertebrados de Portugal [Portuguese Vertebrate Red Data Book]. Instituto de Conservação da Natureza, Lisboa. 660 p (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  14. De Lucas, M., Janss, G. F. E., & Ferrer, M. (2005). A bird and small mammal BACI and IG design studies in a wind farm in Malpica (Spain). Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 3289–3303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dennehy, E., Llaneza, L., & López-Bao, J.V. (2013). Wolf Canis lupus persistence in context to road density and the changing concepts on wolf habitat characteristics. In Abstracts of the XI SECEM (Spanish Mammalogy Society) Congress, Avilés, Asturias, Spain, December 5–8, 2013.Google Scholar
  16. Drewitt, A. L., & Langston, R. H. W. (2006). Assessing the impacts of wind farms on birds. Ibis, 148, 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eggermann, J., Ferrão da Costa, G., Guerra, A. M., Kirchner, W. H., & Petrucci-Fonseca, F. (2011). Presence of Iberian wolf (Canis lupus signatus) in relation to land cover, livestock and human influence in Portugal. Mammalian Biology, 76, 217–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elfstrom, M., Swenson, J. E., & Ball, J. P. (2008). Selection of denning habitats by Scandinavian brown bears. Wildlife Biology, 14, 176–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flagstad, O., & Tovmo, M. (2010). Jerven pa Uljabuouda – hva viser DNAanalysene? [The wolverine at Uljabuouda – what does the DANN analyses show]. Mini report no. 305, NINA, Trondheim, Norway (in Norwegian).Google Scholar
  20. Fuller, T. K., Berg, W. E., Raddle, G. L., Lenarz, M. S., & Joselyn, G. B. (1992). A history and current estimate of wolf distribution and numbers in Minnesota. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 20, 42–55.Google Scholar
  21. George, S. L., & Crooks, K. R. (2006). Recreation and large mammal activity in an urban nature reserve. Biological Conservation, 133, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Godinho, R., Lopes, S., & Ferrand, N. (2007). Estudo da diversidade e estruturação genética das populações de lobo (Canis lupus) em Portugal [Diversity and genetic strucure of wolf populations in Portugal]. Relatório Final. CIBIO/UP. 56 p (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  23. Grilo, C., Moço, G., Cândido, A. T., Alexandre, A. S., & Petrucci-Fonseca, F. (2002). Challenges for the recovery of the Iberian wolf in the Douro River south region. Revista Biologia, 20, 121–133.Google Scholar
  24. Grupo Lobo. (2013). Plano de Monitorização do lobo-ibérico, Parque Eólico do Alto da Coutada, Relatório Final de Projeto [Wolf monitoring program at Alto da Coutada Wind farm, Final Report]. 88 p (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  25. Helldin, J. O., Jung, J., Neumann, W., Olsson, M., Skarin, A., & Widemo, F. (2012). The impact of wind power on terrestrial mammals: A synthesis. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency Report 6510. Stockholm, Sweden, 51 p.Google Scholar
  26. Houle, M., Fortin, D., Dussault, C., Courtois, R., & Ouellet, J. P. (2010). Cumulative effects of forestry on habitat use by gray wolf (Canis lupus) in the boreal forest. Landscape Ecology, 25(3), 419–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jedrzejewski, W., Niedziałkowska, M., Myslajek, R. W., Nowak, S., & Jedrzejewska, B. (2005). Habitat selection by wolves Canis lupus in the uplands and mountains of southern Poland. Acta Theriologica, 50, 417–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kunz, T. H., Arnett, E. B., Erickson, W. P., Hoar, A. R., Johnson, G. D., Larkin, R. P., et al. (2007). Ecological impacts of wind energy development on bats: Questions, research needs, and hypotheses. Frontiers of Ecology and Environment, 5, 315–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuvlesky, W. P., Brennan, L. A., Jr., Morrison, M. L., Boydston, K. K., Ballard, B. M., & Bryant, F. C. (2007). Wind energy development and wildlife conservation: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Wildlife Management, 71, 2487–2498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Llaneza, L., Gracía, E. J., & López-Bao, J. V. (2014). Intensity of territorial marking predicts wolf reproduction: Implications for wolf Monitoring. PLoS ONE, 9(3), e93015. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Llaneza, L., López-Bao, J. V., & Sazatornil, V. (2012). Insights into wolf presence in human-dominated landscapes: The relative role of food availability, humans and landscape attributes. Diversity and Distributions, 18, 459–469. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00869.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lopucki, R., & Mróz, I. (2016). An assessment of non-volant terrestrial vertebrates response to wind farms—a study of small mammals. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188(2), 1–9. doi:10.1007/s10661-016-5095-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lovich, J. E., & Ennen, J. R. (2013). Assessing the state of knowledge of utility-scale wind energy development and operation on non-volant terrestrial and marine wildlife. Applied Energy, 103, 52–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. May, R., Landa, A., van Dijk, J., Linnell, J. D. C., & Andersen, R. (2006). Impact of infrastructure on habitat selection of wolverines (Gulo gulo). Wildlife Biology, 12, 285–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mech, L. D., & Boitani, L. (Eds.) (2003). Wolves; Behavior, ecology and conservation. The University of Chicago Press, 448 p.Google Scholar
  36. Mech, L. D., Fritts, S. H., Raddle, G. L., & Paul, W. J. (1988). Wolf distribution and road density in Minnesota. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 16, 85–87.Google Scholar
  37. Nakamura, M., Rio-Maior, H., Godinho, R., & Álvares, F. (2013). Investigação Aplicada à Conservação do Lobo no Noroeste de Portugal [Applied investigation to wolf conservation in northwestern Portugal]. Relatório Técnico – Ano II, CIBIO-UP, 56 p (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  38. Northrup, J. M., & Wittemyer, G. (2013). Characterising the impacts of emerging energy development on wildlife, with an eye towards mitigation. Ecology Letters, 16, 112–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Passoni, G., Rowcliffe, J. M., Whiteman, A., Huber, D., Kusak, J. (2017). Framework for strategic wind farm site prioritization based on modelled wolf reproduction habitat in Croatia. European Journal of Wildlife Research. doi:10.1007/s10344-017-1092-7
  40. Pearce-Higgins, J. W., Stephen, L., Langston, R. H. W., Bainbridge, I. P., & Bullman, R. (2009). The distribution of breeding birds around wind farms. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 1323–1331.Google Scholar
  41. Person, D. K., & Russell, A. L. (2009). Reproduction and den site selection by wolves in a disturbed landscape. Northwest Science, 83(3), 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Petrucci-Fonseca, F. (1990). O Lobo (Canis lupus signatus Cabrera, 1907) em Portugal - Problemática da sua Conservação [The Wolf in Portugal and its Conservation Problematic]. Ph.D. Dissertation. Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  43. Pimenta, V., Barroso, I., Álvares, F., Correia, J., da Costa, G. F., & Moreira, L. et al. (2005). Situação populacional do lobo em Portugal: resultados do censo nacional 2002/2003 [Wolf population status in Portugal: Results from national censos 200/2003]. Instituto da Conservação da Natureza/Grupo Lobo, Lisboa, 158 p (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  44. Rabin, L. A., Coss, R. G., & Owings, D. H. (2006). The effects of wind turbines on antipredator behavior in California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi). Biological Conservation, 131, 410–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ribeiro, S., & Petrucci-Fonseca, F. (2016). The use of LGDs under different husbandry systems in Portugal: Results from areas of continuous wolf presence and from newly recolonized areas. In Abstracts of the IV Wolf Iberian Congress, Castelo Branco, Portugal, October 27–30, 2016.Google Scholar
  46. Rio-Maior, H., Nakamura. M., & Álvares, F. (2010). Programa de Monitorização do Lobo na área do Parque Eólico do Alto Minho I. Relatório Técnico Final. [Wolf Monitoring Program at Alto Minho I Wind farm area, Final Report], Veranda/CIBIO, 107 pp (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  47. Roque, S., Álvares, F., & Petrucci-Fonseca, F. (2001). Utilización espacio-temporal y hábitos alimentarios de un grupo reproductor de lobos en el noroeste de Portugal. Galemys, 13, 179–198 (In Spanish)Google Scholar
  48. Roque, S., Godinho, R., Cadete, D., Pinto, S., Bernardo, J., & Petrucci-Fonseca, F. et al. (2011). Plano de Monitorização do Lobo Ibérico nas áreas dos Projectos Eólicos das Serras de Montemuro, Freita, Arada e Leomil [Iberian wolf monitoring plan in wind farm areas of Montemuro, Freita, Arada and Leomil mountains]. Relatório Técnico Final. CIBIO-UP/Grupo Lobo, 190 p (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  49. Santos, M., Bastos, R., Travassos, P., Bessa, R., Repas, M., & Cabral, J. (2010). Predicting the trends of vertebrate species richness as a response to wind farms installation in mountain ecosystems of northwest Portugal. Ecological Indicators, 10, 192–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Santos, M., Vaz, C., Travassos, P., & Cabral, J. (2007). Simulating the impact of socio-economic trends on threatened Iberian wolf populations Canis lupus signatus in north-eastern Portugal. Ecological Indicators, 7, 649–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sazatornil, V., Rodríguez, A., Klaczek, M., Ahmadi, M., Álvares, F., Arthur, S., et al. (2016). The role of human-related risk in breeding site selection by wolves. Biological Conservation, 201, 103–110. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.06.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Taylor, L. (2010). The influences of roads on wolf movement on the Scandinavian peninsula in summer. Master thesis, Hedmark University, Faculty of Wildlife Management and Forestry, Evenstad.Google Scholar
  53. Theuerkauf, J., Jedrzejewski, W., Schmidt, K., & Gula, R. (2003). Spatiotemporal segregation of wolves from humans in the Bialowieza Forest (Poland). Journal of Wildlife Management, 67(4), 706–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thiel, R. R. (1985). Relationship between road densities and wolf habitat suitability in Wisconsin. American Midland Naturalist, 113, 404–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Torres, R. T., Silva, N., Brotas, G., & Fonseca, C. (2015a). To eat or not to eat? The diet of the endangered Iberian wolf (Canis lupus signatus) in a human-dominated landscape in central Portugal. PLoS ONE, 10, e0129379. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Torres, R., Miranda, J., Carvalho, J. & Fonseca, C. (2015b). Expansion and current status of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) at the edge of its distribution in Portugal. In Annales Zoologici Fennici (Vol. 52).Google Scholar
  57. Vingada, J., Fonseca, C., Cancela, J., Ferreira, J., & Eira, C. (2010). Ungulates and their management in Portugal. In M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, R. J Putman (Eds,), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Vos, J. (2000). Food habits and livestock depredation of two Iberian wolf packs (Canis lupus signatus) in the north of Portugal. Journal of Zoology London, 251, 457–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wallin, J. A. (1998). A movement study of black bears in the vicinity of a wind turbine project, Searsburg, Vermont. Rapport till Green Mountain Power Corporation, South Burlington, Vermont, USA.Google Scholar
  60. Walter, W. D., Leslie, D. M., Jr., & Jenks, J. A. (2006). Response of Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus) to wind-power development. The American Midland Naturalist, 156, 363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zimmermann, B., Nelson, L., Wabakken, P., Sand, H., & Liberg, O. (2014). Behavioral responses of wolves to roads: Scale-dependent ambivalence. Behavioral Ecology, 25(6), 1353–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gonçalo Ferrão da Costa
    • 1
  • João Paula
    • 1
  • Francisco Petrucci-Fonseca
    • 2
  • Francisco Álvares
    • 3
  1. 1.BioinsightOdivelasPortugal
  2. 2.Grupo Lobo, Department of Animal Biology and CE3C—Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Faculty of SciencesUniversity of LisbonLisbonPortugal
  3. 3.CIBIO/InBIO—Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic ResourcesUniversity of PortoVairãoPortugal

Personalised recommendations