Abstract
The media’s role in shaping politicians’ priorities (political agenda-setting) is usually examined at the institutional level. However, we do not know how politicians’ individual-level characteristics—specifically their attitudes and goals—moderate their responsiveness to the media in real-life. The current study is the first to examine this by using the Israeli case. Results highlight the arena function of the media: the more politicians represent their party-line over public demands, the more responsive they are to media agenda. This indicates that party representatives try to promote their party in the media, which become an arena for partisan conflicts. However, no relationship is found between the degree to which politicians feel overwhelmed by information and media responsiveness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akirav, O. (2010). Candidate selection and a crowded parliament: The Israeli Knesset, 1988–2006. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 16(1), 96–120.
Andeweg, R. B., & Thomassen, J. J. (2005). Modes of political representation: Toward a new typology. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30(4), 507–528.
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Boydstun, A. E., Hardy, A., & Walgrave, S. (2014). Two faces of media attention: Media storm versus non-storm coverage. Political Communication, 31(4), 509–531.
Converse, P. E., & Pierce, R. (1986). Political representation in France. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Davis, A. (2007). Investigating journalist influences on political issue agendas at Westminster. Political Communication, 24(2), 181–199.
Edwards, G. C., & Wood, B. D. (1999). Who influences whom? The President, Congress, and the media. American Political Science Review, 93(2), 327–344.
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Green-Pedersen, C., & Stubager, R. (2010). The political conditionality of mass media influence: When do parties follow mass media attention? British Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 663–677.
Helfer, L. (2016). Media effects on politicians: An individual-level political agenda-setting experiment. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(2), 233–252.
Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jacobs, L. R., & Shapiro, R. Y. (2000). Politicians don’t pander: Political manipulation and the loss of democratic responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of “muddling through”. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88.
Midtbø, T., Walgrave, S., Van Aelst, P., & Christensen, D. A. (2014). Do the media set the agenda of parliament or is it the other way around? Agenda interactions between MPs and mass media. In K. Deschouwer & S. Depauw (Eds.), Representing the people: A survey among members of statewide and substate parliaments (pp. 188–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1963). Constituency influence in Congress. American Political Science Review, 57(1), 45–56.
Popkin, S. L. (1994). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sevenans, J., Walgrave, S., & Vos, D. (2015). Political elites’ media responsiveness and their individual political goals: A study of national politicians in Belgium. Research & Politics, 2(3), 1–7.
Sheafer, T. (2001). Charismatic skill and media legitimacy: An actor-centered approach to understanding the political communication competition. Communication Research, 28(6), 711–736.
Sheafer, T., Shenhav, S. R., & Balmas, M. (2014). Political actors as communicators. In C. Reinemann (Ed.), Political communication (pp. 211–229). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Sheafer, T., & Weimann, G. (2005). Agenda building, agenda setting, priming, individual voting intentions, and the aggregate results: An analysis of four Israeli elections. Journal of Communication, 55(2), 347–365.
Shenhav, S. R., Oshri, O., Ofek, D., & Sheafer, T. (2014). Story coalitions: Applying narrative theory to the study of coalition formation. Political Psychology, 35(5), 661–678.
Shenhav, S. R., & Sheafer, T. (2008). From inter-party debate to inter-personal polemic: Media coverage of internal and external party disputes in Israel, 1949–2003. Party Politics, 14(6), 706–725.
Simon, H. A. (1985). Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology with political science. American Political Science Review, 79(2), 293–304.
Soroka, S. N. (2002a). Agenda-setting dynamics in Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Soroka, S. N. (2002b). Issue attributes and agenda-setting by media, the public and policymakers in Canada. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14(3), 264–285.
Soroka, S. N., Penner, E., & Blidook, K. (2009). Constituency influence in parliament. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 563–591.
Van Aelst, P. (2014). Media, political agendas and public policy. In C. Reinemann (Ed.), Political communication (pp. 231–248). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Van Aelst, P., Brants, K., Van Praag, P., de Vreese, C., Nuytemans, M., & Van Dalen, A. (2008). The fourth estate as superpower? An empirical study of perceptions of media power in Belgium and the Netherlands. Journalism Studies, 9(4), 494–511.
Van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2016). Information and arena: The dual function of the news media for political elites. Journal of Communication, 66(3), 496–518.
Van Noije, L., Oegema, D., & Kleinnijenhuis, J. (2008). Loss of parliamentary control due to mediatization and Europeanization: A longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of agenda building in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. British Journal of Political Science, 38(3), 455–478.
Vliegenthart, R., & Walgrave, S. (2011a). Content matters: The dynamics of parliamentary questioning in Belgium and Denmark. Comparative Political Studies, 44(8), 1031–1059.
Vliegenthart, R., & Walgrave, S. (2011b). When the media matter for politics: Partisan moderators of the mass media’s agenda-setting influence on parliament in Belgium. Party Politics, 17(3), 321–342.
Walgrave, S. (2008). Again, the almighty mass media? The media’s political agenda setting power according to politicians and journalists in Belgium. Political Communication, 25(4), 445–459.
Walgrave, S., Soroka, S., & Nuytemans, M. (2008). The mass media’s political agenda-setting power: A longitudinal analysis of media, parliament, and government in Belgium (1993 to 2000). Comparative Political Studies, 41(6), 814–836.
Walgrave, S., & Van Aelst, P. (2006). The contingency of the mass media’s political agenda setting power: Toward a preliminary theory. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 88–109.
Wanta, W., & Foote, J. (1994). The President-news media relationship: A time series analysis of agenda-setting. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 38(4), 437–451.
Wolfsfeld, G., & Sheafer, T. (2006). Competing actors and the construction of political news: The contest over waves in Israel. Political Communication, 23(3), 333–354.
Wood, B. D., & Peake, J. S. (1998). The dynamics of foreign policy agenda setting. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 173–184.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zoizner, A., Fogel-Dror, Y., Sheafer, T. (2017). When Politicians React to the Media: How the Attitudes and Goals of Political Elites Moderate the Effect of the Media on the Political Agenda. In: Van Aelst, P., Walgrave, S. (eds) How Political Actors Use the Media. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60249-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60249-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60248-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60249-3
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)