News Tone and the Government in the News: When and Why Do Government Actors Appear in the News?

  • Christoffer Green-Pedersen
  • Peter B. Mortensen
  • Gunnar Thesen
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the political tone of news coverage. Three issues are examined. First, we find that news is always more negative than positive from the point of view of the government, although the degree of negativity varies across issues. Second, results show that incumbents appear more often in the news when the tone of the coverage is positive, while opposition presence is linked to a substantially higher share of negative news. Finally, we explore the causal and temporal patterns between variations in news tone and government presence. The findings indicate that increased government presence in the news is a reaction to negative news, but show no signs that the government is able to make subsequent news coverage of an issue more favorable.

References

  1. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Benoit, W. L., Stein, K. A., & Hansen, G. J. (2005). New York Times coverage of presidential campaigns. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(2), 356–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Farnsworth, S. J., & Lichter, S. R. (2007). The nightly news nightmare: Television’s coverage of US presidential elections, 1988–2004. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  4. Ferree, M. M., Gamson, W. A., Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D. (2002). Shaping abortion discourse: Democracy and the public sphere in Germany and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gans, H. J. (2004). Deciding what’s news. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Green-Pedersen, C., & Mortensen, P. B. (2010). Who sets the agenda and who responds to it in the Danish Parliament? European Journal of Political Research, 49(2), 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Green-Pedersen, C., & Mortensen, P. B. (2015). Avoidance and engagement: Issue competition in multiparty systems. Political Studies, 63(4), 747–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Green-Pedersen, C., & Stubager, R. (2007). Coding of Danish radio news 1984–2003. Aarhus: Department of Political Science, Aarhus University. www.agendasettting.dk.
  10. Green-Pedersen, C., & Stubager, R. (2010). The political conditionality of mass media influence: When do parties follow mass media attention? British Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 663–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Green-Pedersen, C., Mortensen, P. B., & Thesen, G. (2017). The incumbency bonus revisited: Causes and consequences of media dominance. British Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 131–148. doi: 10.1017/S0007123415000022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hopmann, D., de Vreese, C., & Albæk, E. (2011). Incumbency bonus in election news coverage explained. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 264–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lund, A. B. (2002). Den redigerende magt: Nyhedsinstitutionens politiske indflydelse. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  14. Miller, A. H., Goldenberg, E. N., & Erbring, L. (1979). Type-set politics: Impact of newspapers on public confidence. American Political Science Review, 73(1), 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mortensen, P. B. (2016). Agencification and blame shifting: Evaluating a neglected side of public sector reforms. Public Administration, 94(3), 630–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shoemaker, P. J., & Vos, T. (2009). Gatekeeping theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Soroka, S. N. (2006). Good news and bad news: Asymmetric responses to economic information. Journal of Politics, 68(2), 372–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Soroka, S. N. (2012). The gatekeeping function: Distributions of information in media and the real world. The Journal of Politics, 74(2), 514–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Soroka, S. N. (2014). Negativity in democratic politics: Causes and consequences. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Thesen, G. (2011). Attack and defend! Explaining party responses to news. Aarhus: Politica.Google Scholar
  21. Thesen, G. (2013). When good news is scarce and bad news is good. European Journal of Political Research, 52(3), 364–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Thesen, G., Green-Pedersen, C., & Mortensen, P. B. (2016). Coding the tone of Danish radio news 1984–2003. Aarhus: Department of Political Science, Aarhus University.Google Scholar
  23. Tresch, A. (2009). Politicians in the media: Determinants of legislators’ presence and prominence in Swiss newspapers. International Journal of Press/Politics, 14(1), 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Van Aelst, P., & de Swert, K. (2009). Politics in the news: Do campaigns matter? Communications, 34(1), 149–168.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christoffer Green-Pedersen
    • 1
  • Peter B. Mortensen
    • 1
  • Gunnar Thesen
    • 2
  1. 1.Aarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
  2. 2.University of StavangerStavangerNorway

Personalised recommendations