Advertisement

Human Capital and Innovations in Education

  • Alexander M. SidorkinEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Science, Technology and Innovation Studies book series (STAIS)

Abstract

Does public investment in educational innovations makes sense? Is there a tangible return on investment in innovations, either public or private? We know for certain that investments in expanding the existing modes of education do pay off (Becker 2009). But does it make sense to invest in innovation? This chapter will consider available evidence on impact of educational innovation, primarily at K-12 level. It will also demonstrate the need to conceptualize the impact of innovation. Work conducted within the next generation of educational reform should look very different from what we have done so far.

References

  1. Baumol, W., & Bowen, W. (1966). Performing arts, the economic dilemma: A study of problems common to theater, opera, music, and dance. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, G. S. (2009). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blumenstyk, G. (2016). Which ed-tech tools truly work? New project aims to tell why no one seems eager to find out. Chronicle of Higher Education, July 21, 2016.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, D. T. (1976). Assessing the impact of planned social change. Occasional Paper Series, #8. http://goo.gl/AAaPx
  5. Carnoy, M., & McEwan, P. (2003). Does privatization improve education? The case of Chile’s national voucher plan. In Choosing choice: School choice in international perspective (pp. 24–44).Google Scholar
  6. Chell, E., & Athayde, R. (2009). The identification and measurement of innovative characteristics of young people. Kingston University, NESTA Research report, July 2009. http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/5985/2/Chell-E-5985.pdf
  7. Deming, D. J., Cohodes, S., Jennings, J., & Jencks, C. (2016). When does accountability work? Education Next, 16(1), 71–76.Google Scholar
  8. Flunger, B., Trautwein, U., Nagengast, B., Lüdtke, O., Niggli, A., & Schnyder, I. (2015). The Janus-faced nature of time spent on homework: Using latent profile analyses to predict academic achievement over a school year. Learning and Instruction, 39, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. (1990). Free to choose: A personal statement. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  10. Gow, J. I. (2014). Public sector innovation theory revisited1. The Innovation Journal, 19(2), 1.Google Scholar
  11. Hanushek, E. A. (1979). Conceptual and empirical issues in the estimation of educational production functions. The Journal of Human Resources, 14, 351–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of 800+ meta-analyses on achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Hattie, J., Masters, D., & Birch, K. (2015). Visible learning into action: International case studies of impact. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Matsuoka, R., Nakamuro, M., & Inui, T. (2015). Emerging inequality in effort: A longitudinal investigation of parental involvement and early elementary school-aged children’s learning time in Japan. Social Science Research, 54, 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ravitch, D., & Mathis, W. J. (2010). A review of college-and career-ready students. In The Obama education blueprint: Researchers examine the evidence (pp. 9–22).Google Scholar
  16. Ritzen, J. M., Van Dommelen, J., & De Vijlder, F. J. (1997). School finance and school choice in the Netherlands. Economics of Education Review, 16(3), 329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. Rubera, G., & Kirca, A. H. (2012). Firm innovativeness and its performance outcomes: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 130–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sahlberg, P. (2004). Teaching and globalization. Managing Global Transitions, 2(1), 65.Google Scholar
  20. Schleicher, A. (2015). School technology struggles to make an impact. BBC News. http://www.bbc.com/news/business-34174795
  21. Sidorkin, A. M. (2002). Learning relations: Impure education, deschooled schools, and dialogue with evil. Counterpoints: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  22. Sidorkin, A. M. (2007). Human capital and the labor of learning: A case of mistaken identity. Educational Theory, 57(2), 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. World Economic Forum. (2016). The Human Capital Report 2016. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/HCR2016_Main_Report.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.California State University Sacramento, National Research University Higher School of EconomicsSacramentoUSA

Personalised recommendations