Skip to main content

Cardinal Relations in ZF Only

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Combinatorial Set Theory

Part of the book series: Springer Monographs in Mathematics ((SMM))

  • 2865 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we shall compare different cardinal numbers in Zermelo–Fraenkel Set Theory, which is Set Theory without the Axiom of Choice. For example, it will be shown that for any infinite set A, the cardinality of the set of finite subsets of A is always strictly smaller than the cardinality of the power set of A.

To some it may appear novel that I include the fourth among the consonances, because practicing musicians have until now relegated it to the dissonances. Hence I must emphasise that the fourth is actually not a dissonance but a consonance.

Gioseffo Zarlino

Le Istitutioni Harmoniche, 1558

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Heinz Bachmann, Transfinite Zahlen, Springer-Verlag, Berlin ⋅ Heidelberg, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Felix Bernstein, Untersuchungen aus der Mengelehre, Dissertation (1901), University of Göttingen (Germany).

    Google Scholar 

  3. ——, Untersuchungen aus der Mengelehre, Mathematische Annalen, vol. 61 (1905), 117–155.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Georg Cantor, Beiträge zur Begründung der transfiniten Mengenlehre. I./II., Mathematische Annalen, vol. 46/49 (1895/1897), 481–512/207–246 (see [5] for a translation into English).

    Google Scholar 

  5. ——, Contributions to the Founding of the Theory of Transfinite Numbers, (translation into English of [4]), [translated, and provided with an introduction and notes, by Philip E. B. Jourdain], Open Court Publishing Company, Chicago and London, 1915 [reprint: Dover Publications, New York, 1952].

    Google Scholar 

  6. ——, Gesammelte Abhandlungen mathematischen und philosophischen Inhalts, Mit Erläuternden Anmerkungen sowie mit Ergänzungen aus dem Briefwechsel Cantor-Dedekind, edited by E. Zermelo, Julius Springer, Berlin, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alonzo Church, Alternatives to Zermelo’s assumption, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 29 (1927), 178–208.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Richard Dedekind, Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen, Friedrich Vieweg & Sohn, Braunschweig, 1888 (see also [9, pp. 335–390]).

    Google Scholar 

  9. ——, Gesammelte mathematische Werke III, edited by R. Fricke, E. Noether, and Ö. Ore, Friedrich Vieweg & Sohn, Braunschweig, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Georg Faber, Über die Abzählbarkeit der rationalen Zahlen, Mathematische Annalen, vol. 60 (1905), 196–203.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thomas E. Forster, Finite-to-one maps, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 68 (2003), 1251–1253.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Abraham A. Fraenkel, Abstract Set Theory, [Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics], North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reuben L. Goodstein, On the restricted ordinal theorem, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 9 (1944), 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lorenz Halbeisen, Vergleiche zwischen unendlichen Kardinalzahlen in einer Mengenlehre ohne Auswahlaxiom, Diplomarbeit (1990), University of Zürich (Switzerland).

    Google Scholar 

  15. ——, A number-theoretic conjecture and its implication for set theory, Acta Mathematica Universitatis Comenianae, vol. 74 (2005), 243–254.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lorenz Halbeisen and Norbert Hungerbühler, Number theoretic aspects of a combinatorial function, Notes on Number Theory and Discrete Mathematics, vol. 5 (1999), 138–150.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lorenz Halbeisen and Saharon Shelah, Consequences of arithmetic for set theory, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 59 (1994), 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  18. ——, Relations between some cardinals in the absence of the axiom of choice, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 7 (2001), 237–261.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lauri Kirby and Jeff B. Paris, Accessible independence results for Peano arithmetic, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 14 (1982), 285–293.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Djuro (George) Kurepa, On a characteristic property of finite sets, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, vol. 2 (1952), 323–326.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hans Läuchli, Ein Beitrag zur Kardinalzahlarithmetik ohne Auswahlaxiom, Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, vol. 7 (1961), 141–145.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Henri Lebesgue, Sur les fonctions représentables analytiquement, Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées (6ème série), vol. 1 (1905), 139–216.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Azriel Lévy, The independence of various definitions of finiteness, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 46 (1958), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Adolf Lindenbaum and Alfred Tarski, Communication sur les recherches de la théorie des ensembles, Comptes Rendus des Séances de la Société des Sciences et des Lettres de Varsovie, Classe III, vol. 19 (1926), 299–330.

    Google Scholar 

  25. John von Neumann, Die Axiomatisierung der Mengenlehre, Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 27 (1928), 669–752.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jeff B. Paris, Combinatorial statements independent of arithmetic, in Mathematics of Ramsey Theory (J. Nešetřil and V. Rödl, eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990, pp. 232–245.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ernst Schröder, Über zwei Definitionen der Endlichkeit und G. Cantor’sche Sätze, Nova Acta, Abhandlungen der Kaiserlich Leopoldinisch-Carolinisch Deutschen Akademie der Naturforscher, vol. 71 (1898), 301–362.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wacław Sierpiński, Sur l’égalité 2 \(\mathfrak{m} =\) 2 \(\mathfrak{n}\) pour les nombres cardinaux, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 3 (1922), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  29. ——, Sur une décomposition effective d’ensembles, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 29 (1937), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  30. ——, Sur l’implication \((2\mathfrak{m} \leq 2\mathfrak{n}) \rightarrow (\mathfrak{m} \leq \mathfrak{n})\) pour les nombres cardinaux, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 34 (1946), 148–154.

    Google Scholar 

  31. ——, Sur la division des types ordinaux, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 35 (1948), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  32. ——, Sur les types d’ordre des ensembles linéaires, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 37 (1950), 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  33. ——, Sur un type ordinal dénombrable qui a une infinite indénombrable de divisenrs gauches, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 37 (1950), 206–208.

    Google Scholar 

  34. ——, Cardinal and Ordinal Numbers, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ernst Specker, Verallgemeinerte Kontinuumshypothese und Auswahlaxiom, Archiv der Mathematik, vol. 5 (1954), 332–337.

    Google Scholar 

  36. ——, Zur Axiomatik der Mengenlehre (Fundierungs- und Auswahlaxiom), Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, vol. 3 (1957), 173–210.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ladislav Spišiak and Peter Vojtáš, Dependences between definitions of finiteness, Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, vol. 38(113) (1988), 389–397.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Alfred Tarski, Sur les ensembles finis, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 6 (1924), 45–95.

    Google Scholar 

  39. ——, Cancellation laws in the arithmetic of cardinals, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 36 (1949), 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  40. John K. Truss, Dualisation of a result of Specker’s, Journal of the London Mathematical Society (2), vol. 6 (1973), 286–288.

    Google Scholar 

  41. ——, Classes of Dedekind finite cardinals, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 84 (1974), 187–208.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Halbeisen, L.J. (2017). Cardinal Relations in ZF Only. In: Combinatorial Set Theory. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60231-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics