Business Groups, Tax Efficiency, and Regressivity in Colombia

  • Néstor Castañeda
Chapter
Part of the Latin American Political Economy book series (LAPE)

Abstract

Castañeda discusses the role of business interest groups in tax policymaking. Using the case of Colombia, he argues that tax policy is a limited tool to promote economic growth and redistribution in Latin America because business interest groups have effectively opposed progressive taxation and have also transferred the cost of taxation to low- and middle-income tax payers. In line with the literature on fiscal contract, Castañeda shows that the political equilibrium between policymakers and business interest groups in Colombia make progressive and structural tax reforms very unlikely. The case of Colombia is very illustrative of the problems that Latin American governments face to implement progressive tax reforms.

References

  1. Abascal, M. C., Carranza, L., Ledo, M., & Lopez, A. (2011). Impact of Financial Regulation on Emerging Countries. BBVA Research Working Papers.Google Scholar
  2. Alesina, A., Cohen, G., & Roubini, N. (1992). Macroeconomic Policy and Elections in OECD Democracies. Economics & Politics, 4(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alesina, A., & Rosenthal, H. (1995). Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alvaredo, F., & Londoño, J. (2013). High Incomes and Personal Taxation in a Developing Economy: Colombia 1993–2010. CEQ Working Paper.Google Scholar
  5. Baez, J., Camacho, A., Conover, E., & Zarate, R. (2012). Conditional Cash Transfers, Political Participation, and Voting Behavior. World Bank Policy Research Working Papers.Google Scholar
  6. Bonilla, R., Cordoba, R., Lewin, A., Morales, O., Montoya, S., Perry, G., et al. (2016). Informe final presentado al Ministerio de Hacienda y Crédito Publico. Fedesarrollo.Google Scholar
  7. Campello, D. (2015). The Politics of Market Discipline in Latin America: Globalization and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1979). Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Castañeda, N. (2017). Business Coordination and Tax Politics. Political Studies, 65(1), 122–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castañeda, N., & Doyle, D. (2017). Taxation and Redistribution. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  11. Corbacho, A., Cibils, V. F., & Lora, E. (Eds.). (2013). More Than Revenue: Taxation as a Development Tool. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  12. Dargent, E., & Muñoz, P. (2011). Democracy Against Parties? Party System Deinstitutionalization in Colombia. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 3(2), 43–71.Google Scholar
  13. Evans, P. (1979). Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fairfield, T. (2010). Business Power and Tax Reform: Taxing Income and Profits in Chile and Argentina. Latin American Politics and Society, 52(2), 37–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fairfield, T. (2015). Private Wealth and Public Revenue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Falleti, T. (2010). Decentralization and Subnational Politics in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Flores-Macias, G. (2014). Financing Security Through Elite Taxation: The Case of Colombia’s Democratic Security Taxes. Studies in Comparative International Development, 49(4), 477–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Focanti, D., Hallerberg, M., & Scartascini, C. (2016). Tax Reforms in Latin America in an Era of Democracy. Latin American Research Review, 51(1), 132–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garay, L. J. (1998). Colombia: estructura industrial e internacionalización 1967–1996. Santafé de Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación.Google Scholar
  20. Garcia Isaza, J. G. (2005). Liberalización y transformación en la industria colombiana. Bogotá: Universidad Autónoma de Colombia.Google Scholar
  21. Gomez Sabaini, J. C., & Moran, D. (2014). Tax Policy in Latin America: Assessment and Guidelines for a Second Generation of Reforms. Serie Macroeconomia del Desarrollo.Google Scholar
  22. Gonzalez, M. B. (2011). Clientelismo y Familias en Acción: una mirada desde lo local. Revista Opera, 11, 147–164.Google Scholar
  23. Hartlyn, J. (1988). The Politics of Coalition Rule in Colombia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Jaramillo, J., & Parra, J. (2012). Evolución de la concentración y especialización industrial en Colombia, 1975–2005. Ensayos de Economía, 22(40), 81–102.Google Scholar
  25. Lewin, J., & Rudas, N. (2013). Las sorpresas de los que le donaron a la campaña presidencial de Santos. La Silla Vacía.Google Scholar
  26. Mahon, J., Bergman, M., & Arnson, C. (2015). Progressive Tax Reform and Equality in Latin America. Woodrow Wilson Center Reports on the Americas.Google Scholar
  27. Malloy, J. (Ed.). (1976). Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  28. Misas, G. (2002). La ruptura de los 90 del gradualismo al colapso. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar
  29. Murillo, M. V., Oliveros, V., & Vaishnav, M. (2010). Dataset on Political Ideology of Presidents and Parties in Latin America. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
  30. OECD. (2015a). OECD Economic Surveys: Colombia. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  31. OECD. (2015b). Tax Administration 2015: Comparative Information on OECD and Other Advanced and Emerging Economies. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Olivera, M., Pachon, M., & Perry, G. (2010). The Political Economy of Fiscal Reform: The Case of Colombia, 1986–2006. IDB Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
  33. Parra, B. (2004). Los negocios de Mingo: efectos de la apertura y la globalización en los grupos Bavaria y Valores Bavaria. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar
  34. Peres, W., & Garrido, C. (1998). Grandes empresas y grupos industriales Latinoamericanos: expansión y desafíos en la era de la apertura y la globalización. Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
  35. Ramirez, J. C. (2005). Las negociaciones comerciales de Colombia: del Área de Libre Comercio de las Américas (ALCA) a un tratado de Libre Comercio (TLC) con Estados Unidos. Bogotá: United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
  36. Rettberg, A. (2003). Cacaos y tigres de papel: el gobierno de Samper y los empresarios colombianos. Ediciones UniAndes.Google Scholar
  37. Rettberg, A. (2005). Business Versus Business?: Grupos and Organized Business in Colombia. Latin American Politics and Society, 47(1), 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sanchez, F. & Espinosa, S. (2005). Impuestos y reformas tributarias en Colombia, 1980–2003. Documentos CEDE.Google Scholar
  39. Schmitter, P. (1974). Still the Century of Corporatism? The Review of Politics, 36(1), 85–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schneider, B. R. (2004). Business Politics and the State in Twentieth-Century Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schneider, B. R. (2013). Hierarchical Capitalism in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stein, E., & Caro, L. (2017). Ideology and Taxation in Latin America. Economia: Journal of the Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association, 17, 1–27.Google Scholar
  43. Transparencia por Colombia. (2014). Análisis de la financiación de las campañas legislativas de Colombia en 2014. Transparencia por Colombia.Google Scholar
  44. Transparencia por Colombia. (2016). Dinero, elecciones y transparencia. Transparencia por Colombia.Google Scholar
  45. Von Schiller, A. (2016). Business Organisations, Party Systems and Tax Composition in Developing Countries: A Comparison Between Colombia and Peru. The Journal of Development Studies, 52(12), 1722–1743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. World Bank. (2012). El gasto tributario en Colombia: Una propuesta de evaluación integral y sistemática de este instrumento de política pública. World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Néstor Castañeda
    • 1
  1. 1.University College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations