Ways Forward for Syria



Salamey and Rizk consider that almost every pan-Arab nationalist republic has experienced a similar course of rising political contestation and growing rifts between identity groups. Common to all is a half-century project of nationalization that attempted, in vain, to assimilate the different communal groups into a unified national identity. Outcomes have only exacerbated communal fragmentation and power contestation. Post-Arab Spring, violent events attest to the fallout of social pacts among national groups, majorities, and minorities alike. Consequently, the reconstruction of politics in favor of an accommodating and consensual arrangement is a prerequisite for an inclusive post-conflict multi-communitarian agreement. A post-conflict power sharing pact needs to protect political plurality and communal diversity while navigating pathways toward conflict resolution in Syria.


Middle East And North Africa Middle East (MENA) Peacebuilding Conflict Mitigation Power-sharing Agreement Consociational Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anderson, Liam, and Gareth Stansfield. 2009. Crisis in Kirkuk: The Ethnopolitics of Conflict and Compromise. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badran, Dany. 2013. Democracy and Rhetoric in the Arab World. The Journal of the Middle East and Africa 4 (1): 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boie, Waddell, and Jaquilyn Rae. 2015. The Power of Numbers: Ethnic Group Size, Collective Action, and Ethnic Civil Conflict. New Jersey: Princeton University (Dissertation).Google Scholar
  4. Butenschøn, Nils A., Øyvind Stiansen, and Kåre Vollan. 2015. Power-sharing in Conflict-ridden Societies: Challenges for Building Peace and Democratic Stability. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  5. Eeckelaert, Ruba Al-Fattal. 2017. A New Quota System for Syria. Hivos People Unlimited.
  6. Horowitz, Donald L. 1993. Democracy in Divided Societies. Journal of Democracy 4 (4): 18–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kerr, Michael. 2005. Imposing Power-Sharing: Conflict and Coexistence in Northern Ireland and Lebanon. Dublin: Irish Academic Press Ltd.Google Scholar
  8. Korybko, Andrew. 2017. Federalization Could Still Be in the Cards for Syria. The Duran, February 2. April 2017.
  9. Lijphart, Arend. 1969. Consociational Democracy. World Politics 21 (2): 207–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ———. 2002. The Wave of Power-Sharing Democracy. In The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Management, and Democracy, ed. Andrew Reynold, 37–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2008. Thinking about Democracy: Power Sharing and Majority Rule in Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Longva, Anh Nga, and Anne Sofie Roald, eds. 2015. Religious Minorities in the Middle East: Domination, Self-empowerment, Accommodation, vol. 108. Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  13. McGarry, John, and Brendan O’Leary. 2007. Iraq’s Constitution of 2005: Liberal Consociation as Political Prescription. International Journal of Constitutional Law 5 (4): 670–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Peel, Michael. 2011. Assad’s Family Picked Up by the West’s Radar. Financial Times, April 27.Google Scholar
  15. Rabushka, Alvin, and Kenneth A. Shepsle. 1972. Politics in Plural Societies: A Theory of Democratic Instability. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Salamey, Imad. 2017. The Decline of Nation-States after the Arab Spring: The Rise of Communitocracy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Weitz, Lev. 2015. Religious Minorities in the Modern Middle East. Foreign Policy Research Institute. November. Accessed Feb 2016.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Social Justice and Conflict ResolutionLebanese American UniversityBeirutLebanon
  2. 2.United Nations Development ProgramDamascusSyria

Personalised recommendations