Thoracolumbar Scoliosis (AIS) Posterior Surgery Complication

  • Chewei Liu
  • Lee A. Tan
  • Kathy M. Blanke
  • Lawrence G. Lenke
Chapter

Abstract

The distal adding-on phenomenon is a known complication after surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) that can lead to loss of deformity correction, worsening pain, wedging, and degeneration of the adjacent intervertebral disc, as well as the need for revision surgery. Various factors have been associated with the adding-on phenomenon including age, skeletal maturity, direction of the L4 disc tilt, postoperative shoulder imbalance, and, perhaps most importantly, the selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). This chapter provides a case illustration of the adding-on phenomenon along with discussion of various risk factors and a review of pertinent literature. Spinal deformity surgeons must recognize these risk factors for adding-on and choose the LIV carefully to optimize clinical outcomes and avoid the need for revision surgery.

Keywords

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Adding-on Lenke classification Lowest instrumented vertebra Complication Touched vertebra 

References

  1. 1.
    Cho RH, Yaszay B, Bartley CE, Bastrom TP, Newton PO. Which Lenke 1A curves are at the greatest risk for adding-on... And why? Spine. 2012;37(16):1384–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lehman RA, Lenke LG, Keeler KA, Kim YJ, Buchowski JM, Cheh G, et al. Operative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with posterior pedicle screw-only constructs: minimum three-year follow-up of one hundred fourteen cases. Spine. 2008;33(14):1598–604.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang Y, Hansen ES, Høy K, Wu C, Bünger CE. Distal adding-on phenomenon in Lenke 1A scoliosis: risk factor identification and treatment strategy comparison. Spine. 2011;36(14):1113–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lakhal W, Loret J-E, de Bodman C, Fournier J, Bergerault F, de Courtivron B, et al. The progression of lumbar curves in adolescent Lenke 1 scoliosis and the distal adding-on phenomenon. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(4):S249–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cao K, Watanabe K, Kawakami N, Tsuji T, Hosogane N, Yonezawa I, et al. Selection of lower instrumented vertebra in treating Lenke type 2A adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2014;39(4):E253–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Hosogane N, Kawakami N, Tsuji T, Uno K, et al. Postoperative distal adding-on and related factors in Lenke type 1A curve. Spine. 2013;38(9):737–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zang L, Hai Y, Yuan S, Su Q, Yang J, Guan L, et al. Distal adding-on and risk factors in severe and rigid scoliosis. Spine. 2016;42(3):160–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Qin X, Sun W, Xu L, Liu Z, Qiu Y, Zhu Z. Selecting the last “substantially” touching vertebra as lowest instrumented vertebra in Lenke type 1A curve: radiographic outcomes with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Spine. 2016;41(12):E742–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang C, Li Y, Yang M, Zhao Y, Zhu X, Li M, et al. Adding-on phenomenon after surgery in Lenke type 1, 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is it predictable? Spine. 2016;41(8):698–704.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nohara A, Kawakami N, Saito T, Tsuji T, Ohara T, Suzuki Y, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between anterior fusion and posterior fusion in patients with AIS Lenke type 1 or 2 that underwent selective thoracic fusion-long-term follow-up study longer than 10 postoperative years. Spine. 2015;40(21):1681–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murphy JS, Upasani VV, Yaszay B, Bastrom TP, Bartley CE, Samdani A, et al. Predictors of distal adding-on in thoracic major curves with AR lumbar modifiers. Spine. 2016;42(4):E211–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Suk S-I, Lee S-M, Chung E-R, Kim J-H, Kim W-J, Sohn H-M. Determination of distal fusion level with segmental pedicle screw fixation in single thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2003;28(5):484–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang Y, Bünger CE, Zhang Y, Wu C, Li H, Hansen ES. Distal adding-on in Lenke 1A scoliosis: how to more effectively determine the onset of distal adding-on. Spine. 2013;38(6):490–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    King HA, Moe JH, Bradford DS, Winter RB. The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65(9):1302–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Potter BK, Rosner MK, Lehman RA, Polly DW, Schroeder TM, Kuklo TR. Reliability of end, neutral, and stable vertebrae identification in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2005;30(14):1658–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cho K-J, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Kamiya M, Sides B. Selection of the optimal distal fusion level in posterior instrumentation and fusion for thoracic hyperkyphosis: the sagittal stable vertebra concept. Spine. 2009;34(8):765–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chewei Liu
    • 1
  • Lee A. Tan
    • 2
  • Kathy M. Blanke
    • 3
  • Lawrence G. Lenke
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of OrthopedicsCathay General HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.The Spine HospitalColumbia University Medical CenterNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of OrthopedicsThe Spine Hospital, New York Presbyterian/AllenNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations