Skip to main content
  • 1094 Accesses

Abstract

Osteoporosis is the most common cause of vertebral compression fracture. Pain from a compression fracture is multifaceted, incompletely understood, and debilitating. If conservative management fails, then injection therapies are offered. Vertebral augmentation therapy is the most immediate way to treat pain from a vertebral compression fracture. The exact mechanism of pain relief from this therapy is not completely understood. This intervention is not risk-free. Quite often pain persists or recurs soon after this treatment. The chapter reviews different etiologies that can cause persistent pain after the augmentation therapy; an algorithm to work up the patient in a step-by-step fashion is proposed, and treatment options are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Osteoporosis Foundation: http:/www.nof.org/osteoporosis.

  2. Genant HK, Cooper C, Poor G, et al. Interim report and recommendations of the World Health Organization task force for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10:259–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, Jacobsen SJ, et al. Population-based study of survival after osteoporotic fractures. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137:1001–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Silverman SL, Minshall ME, Shen W, et al. The relationship of health-related quality of life to prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44:2611–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lyritis GP, Mayasis B, Tsakalakos N, et al. The natural history of the osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Clin Rheumatol. 1989;2:66–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Silverman SL. The clinical consequences of vertebral compression fracture. Bone. 1992;13:S27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jensen ME, McGraw JK, Cardella JF, Hirsch JA. Position statement on percutaneous vertebral augmentation: a consensus statement developed by the American society of interventional and therapeutic neuroradiology, society of interventional radiology, American association of neurological surgeons/congress of neurological surgeons, and American society of spine radiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1439–43.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Robinson Y, Olerud C. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty—a systematic review of cement augmentation techniques for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures compared to standard medical therapy. Maturitas. 2012;72:42–29.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Humes PA, Krebs J, Ferguson S, Berlemann U. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: a systematic review of 69 clinical studies. Spine. 2006;31:1983–2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Han S, Shuanglin W, Ning L, Tong Y, Zhang J, Fan S. Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials. Int Orthop. 2011;35:1349–58.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Taylor RS, Taylor RJ, Fritzell P. Balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures: a comparative systematic review of efficacy and safety. Spine. 2006;31:2747–55.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nussbaum DA, Gailloud P, Murphy K. A review of complications associated with vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty as reported to the Food and Drug Administration medical device related web site. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15:1185–92.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eck JC, Nachtigall D, Humphreys SC, et al. Comparison of vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplastsy for treatment of vertebral compression fractures: a metaanalysis of the literature. Spine J. 2008;8:488–97.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bliemel C, Ludwig O, Beucking B, Timmesfeld T, Ruchholtz S, Kreuger A. Higher incidence of new vertebral fractures following percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty—fact or fiction? Acta Orthop Belg. 2012;78:220–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kallmes DF, Comstock BA. Commentary: no comparison: conservative management of painful spontaneous osteoporotic compression fractures is the way to go. Spine J. 2012;12:1006–7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nikolai B, John M, James B. The Pain of Vertebral Compression Fractures Can Arise in the Posterior Elements. Pain Med. 2010;11(11):1666–73.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tariq Malik M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Malik, T. (2018). Increased Pain After Kyphoplasty. In: Anitescu, M., Benzon, H., Wallace, M. (eds) Challenging Cases and Complication Management in Pain Medicine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60072-7_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60072-7_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60070-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60072-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics