Advertisement

Personal Epistemologies and Disciplinarity in the Workplace: Implications for International Students in Higher Education

Chapter
Part of the Professional and Practice-based Learning book series (PPBL, volume 19)

Abstract

Workplace experiences for international students undertaking higher education programmes are important aspects of their university experience. This is because many of the programmes in which they are enrolled are directed towards particular occupations. Nevertheless, these workplace experiences can be both engaging and daunting for all, but perhaps no more so than for international students, who may be unfamiliar with Australian workplace mores and practices, and therefore less able to understand and negotiate with them than their domestic counterparts. Not only do international students have to become familiar with the requirements of their selected profession but also need to understand and negotiate unfamiliar cultural environments. These students often have to engage in complex and demanding learning processes when engaging in work placements, perhaps more so than their domestic peers. Because of these discipline-based and workplace environmental challenges, it is necessary for these students and their mentors or supervisors to try and effectively mediate their participation and learning in the work placements. If all of those involved in work placements are aware of these factors, then the experiences and outcomes should potentially be more beneficial for all parties (i.e. students, supervisors, university staff, and workplaces). These issues are explored in this chapter through the notions of disciplinarity, which attends to the epistemological nuances of particular study or knowledge areas and how students develop skills as disciplinary professionals. With a focus on international students, the elaborations of these issues are explored through consideration of interculturalisation and how both the experiences and experiencing of international students impacts upon the success of their work placements. Using these concepts as explanatory bases stands to permit the illumination and elaboration of the complexity of factors and processes occurring as these students learn about, and participate in, their selected professional discipline and the cultural environment of its practice.

References

  1. Anderson, A., & Valente, J. (Eds.). (2002). Disciplinarity at the Fin de Siècle. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Angelo, T. (2002). Designing subjects for learning: Practical research-based principles and guidelines. In L. Hunt & D. Chalmers (Eds.), University teaching in focus: A learning-centred approach (pp. 93–111). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Barker, M., & GIHE. (2011). The GIHE good practice guide to internationalising the curriculum. Brisbane: Griffith Institute for Higher Education.Google Scholar
  4. Barton, G. M. (2015). Developing confidence and competence as a pre-service music teacher: Personal epistemology in a middle years course. Australian Journal of Music Education, 3, 16–25.Google Scholar
  5. Barton, G. M., & Ryan, M. (2013). Multimodal approaches to reflective teaching and assessment in higher education: A cross disciplinary approach in creative industries. Higher Education Research and Development, 33(3), 409–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barton, G. M., Hartwig, K., & Cain, M. (2015). International students’ experience of practicum in teacher education: An exploration through internationalisation and professional socialisation. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(8), 149–163.Google Scholar
  7. Billett, S. (2009). Developing agentic professional through practice-based pedagogies. Office of Learning and Teaching Report.Google Scholar
  8. Billett, S. (2011). Curriculum and pedagogic bases for effectively integrating practice-based experiences. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council. ISBN 978-1-921856-25-9.Google Scholar
  9. Billett, S. (2015). Integrating practice-based learning experiences into higher education programs. Dordrecht: Springer. ISBN 978-94-017-7229-7.Google Scholar
  10. Byram, M., Nichols, A., & Stevens, D. (Eds.). (2001). Developing intercultural competence in practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar
  11. Coffey, M., Samuel, U., Collins, S., & Morris, L. (2012). A comparative study of social work students in India and the UK: Stress, support and well-being. British Journal of Social Work, 1–18. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs112.
  12. Collen, A. (2002). Disciplinarity in the pursuit of knowledge. In G. Minati & E. Pessa (Eds.), Emergence in complex, cognitive, social, and biological systems (pp. 285–296). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davies, W. M., & Devlin, M. (2007, commissioned report). Interdisciplinary education: Implications for teaching and learning. University report for the Centre for Higher Education (CSHE). CSHE Publication, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  14. Entwistle, N., & Peterson, E. (2004). Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: Relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ewing, R. (2012). Curriculum and assessment: A narrative approach. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Freebody, P., Maton, C., & Martin, J. R. (2008). Talk, text, and knowledge in cumulative, integrated learning: A response to ‘intellectual challenge’. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 31(2), 188–201.Google Scholar
  17. Freebody, P., Chan, E., & Barton, G. M. (2013). Literacy and curriculum: Language and knowledge in the classroom. In T. Cremin, B. Comber, K. Hall, & L. Moll (Eds.), International handbook of research in children’s literacy, learning and culture (pp. 304–318). Maiden: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garrett, R. (2014). Explaining international student satisfaction: Insights from the international student barometer. Retrieved from https://www.i-graduate.org/assets/2014-Explaining-Satisfaction.pdf
  19. Harrison, G., & Ip, R. (2013). Extending the terrain of inclusive education in the classroom to the field: International students on placement. Social Work Education: The International Journal, 32(2), 230–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Howells, S., Barton, G. M., & Westerveld, M. (2016). Exploring the development of cultural awareness amongst post-graduate speech-language pathology students. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(3), 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huang, R. (2013). International experience and graduate employability: Perceptions of Chinese international students in the UK. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 13, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hunter, C. A., Pearson, D., & Gutiérrez, A. R. (2015). Interculturalization and teacher education: Theory to practice. London: Routledge Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Jollands, M., Jolly, L., & Molyneaux, T. (2012). Project-based learning as a contributing factor to graduates’ work readiness. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(2), 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kelleher, S., Fitzgerald, S., & Hegarty, J. (2016). Factors that influence nursing and midwifery students’ intentions to study abroad: A qualitative study using the theory of planned behaviour. Nurse Education Today, 44, 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knoch, U., May, L., Macqueen, S., Pill, J., & Storch, N. (2016). Transitioning from university to the workplace: Stakeholder perceptions of academic and professional writing demands. IELTS Research Reports Online Series. Australia: IELTS Partners.Google Scholar
  26. Lublin, J. (2003). Deep, surface and strategic approaches to learning. Centre for teaching and learning, good practice in teaching and learning. Dublin: UCD.Google Scholar
  27. Marsh, C. J. (2009). Key concepts for understanding curriculum. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Marsh, C. J., & Willis, G. (2003). Curriculum: Alternative approaches, ongoing issues (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  29. McDermott-Levy, R., Cantrell, M., & Reynolds, K. (2014). Promoting cultural understanding through pediatric clinical dyads: An education research project. Nurse Education Today, 34(11), 1346–1351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Minati, G., & Collen, A. (1997). Introduction to systemics. Walnut Creek: Eagleye Books International.Google Scholar
  31. Newton, L., Pront, L., & Giles, T. (2016). Experiences of registered nurses who supervise international nursing students in the clinical and classroom setting: An integrative literature review. Journal of Clinical Nursing. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13127.
  32. Onsando, G., & Billett, S. (2009). African students from refugee backgrounds in Australian TAFE institutes: A case for transformative learning goals and processes. International Journal of Training Research, 7(2), 80–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Patrick, H., & Pintrich, P. (2001). Conceptual change in teachers’ intuitive conceptions of learning, motivation and instruction: The role of motivational and epistemological beliefs. In B. Torff & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Understanding and teaching the intuitive mind: Student and teacher learning (pp. 117–128). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  34. Peck, L. K., Chiang, Y., & BrckaLorenz, A. (2015). Global perspective in curricula and deep approaches to learning: Examining faculty practices for engagement. Presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual conference.Google Scholar
  35. Roberts, A., Chou, P., & Ching, G. (2010). Contemporary trends in east Asian higher education: Dispositions of international students in a Taiwan University. Higher Education, 59, 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Shulman, L. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Southern QueenslandSpringfield CentralAustralia
  2. 2.Griffith UniversityNathanAustralia

Personalised recommendations