Exploring Learner Talk in English Interviews

  • Eric Friginal
  • Joseph J. Lee
  • Brittany Polat
  • Audrey Roberson


The guiding question behind this section is straightforward: what can we learn about the L2 learning experience by asking L2 learners to discuss their own L2 learning? In order to answer this question, we use specialized software to analyze the semantic content of L2 learner talk as advanced English learners reflect on their learning experience in a structured interview. By using three different analytical techniques, we approach the question from different angles, distinguishing both general patterns in the experience of learning a L2 as well as individual differences in learning experience. The purpose of this and the following chapters in Part III, therefore, is threefold: (1) to discover the words and themes used by highly proficient L2 English learners as they describe their learning experience; (2) to discern what these words can tell us about the learning process; and (3) to determine what these words can tell us about individual learners.


  1. Duriau, V., Reger, R., & Pfarrer, M. (2007). A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organizational Research Methods, 10(5), 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Lancia, F. (Ed.). (2004). Strumenti per l’analasi dei testi [Tools for textual analysis]. Rome: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  3. Lancia, F. (2016). T-Lab online user manual.
  4. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (2014). An introduction to second language acquisition research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Pennebaker, J., Chung, C., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., & Booth, R. (2007b). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007 [LIWC manual]. Austin: Scholar
  6. Polat, B. (2013a). The L2 experience interview corpus. Atlanta: Georgia State University.Google Scholar
  7. Polat, B. (2013b). L2 experience interviews: What can they tell us about individual differences? System, 41, 70–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Riazi, A. (2016). Innovative mixed-methods research: Moving beyond design technicalities to epistemological and methodological realizations. Applied Linguistics, 37(1), 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Tausczik, Y., & Pennebaker, J. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Friginal
    • 1
  • Joseph J. Lee
    • 2
  • Brittany Polat
    • 3
  • Audrey Roberson
    • 4
  1. 1.Applied Linguistics and ESLGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Ohio UniversityAthensUSA
  3. 3.Georgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  4. 4.Hobart and William Smith CollegesGenevaUSA

Personalised recommendations