Advertisement

You, I, and We: Personal Pronouns in EAP Classroom Discourse

  • Eric Friginal
  • Joseph J. Lee
  • Brittany Polat
  • Audrey Roberson
Chapter

Abstract

Personal pronouns are important markers of teacher-student relationships, as they permit both parties to locate themselves and each other in the varying conversational spaces in classroom settings. They also serve as critical indicators of degrees of personal involvement and interaction in the classroom. While a growing number of studies have examined instructors’ use of personal pronouns in university classrooms, very little is known of L2 learners’ and teachers’ use of the same. This chapter explores personal pronouns, specifically you, I, and we and their variants in learner and teacher speech in the EAP classrooms. We not only examine the distribution of these pronouns in the L2CD-S and L2CD-T, we also report on the comparative analysis of their sub-functions in the two sub-corpora.

References

  1. Anthony, L. (2014). AntConc (Version 3.4.3) [Computer software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Accessed 9 July. http://www.laurenceanthony.net/
  2. Basturkmen, H. (2009). Developing courses for English for specific purposes. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cheng, S. W. (2012). “That’s it for today”: Academic lecture closings and the impact of class size. English for Specific Purposes, 31, 234–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crawford Camiciottoli, B. (2005). Adjusting a business lecture for an international audience: A case study. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fortanet, I. (2004). The use of ‘we’ in university lectures: Reference and function. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  8. Lee, J. J. (2009). Size matters: An exploratory comparison of small- and large-class university lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 29, 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee, J. J. (2016). “There’s intentionality behind it…”: A genre analysis of EAP classroom lessons. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee, J. J., & Subtirelu, N. (2015). Metadiscourse in the classroom: A comparative analysis of EAP lessons and university lectures. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. O’Boyle, A. (2014). “You” and “I” in university seminars and spoken learner discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 16, 40–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rounds, P. L. (1987a). Characterizing successful classroom discourse for NNS teaching assistant training. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 643–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rounds, P. L. (1987b). Multifunctional personal pronoun use in education setting. English for Specific Purposes, 6, 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Yeo, J.-Y., & Ting, S.-H. (2014). Personal pronouns for student engagement in arts and science lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 34, 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Friginal
    • 1
  • Joseph J. Lee
    • 2
  • Brittany Polat
    • 3
  • Audrey Roberson
    • 4
  1. 1.Applied Linguistics and ESLGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Ohio UniversityAthensUSA
  3. 3.Georgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  4. 4.Hobart and William Smith CollegesGenevaUSA

Personalised recommendations