Advertisement

Social Dynamics During Peer Response: Patterns of Interaction in the L2PR Corpus

  • Eric FriginalEmail author
  • Joseph J. Lee
  • Brittany Polat
  • Audrey Roberson
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the social dynamics of peer conversations in the L2PR Corpus (Roberson 2015) using Storch’s (2002) patterns of interaction framework to understand how learners share control over the direction of the task, and how they engage with each other’s feedback on writing. We first provide a description of the data sources used in the analysis (peer response transcripts; stimulated recall interview transcripts; and first and second drafts of student writing), and then examine the relationship between patterns of interaction and revision practices. Chapter 13 will further explore one linguistic feature of the patterns of interaction analyzed in this chapter: the use of modal verbs as stance markers by collaborative and non-collaborative pairs.

References

  1. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2011). Using pretask modelling to encourage collaborative learning opportunities. Language Teaching Research, 15(2), 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Liu, J. & Sadler (2003). Peer response in second language writing classrooms (Michigan series on Teaching Multilingual Writers). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  5. Mendonca, C. O., & Johnson, K. E. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 745–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Nelson, G. L., & Murphy, J. M. (1993). An L2 writing group: Task and social dimensions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), 171–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 265–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Roberson, A. (2015). The second language peer response (L2PR) corpus. Atlanta: Georgia State University.Google Scholar
  9. Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Tan, L. L., Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2010). Pair interactions and mode of communication: Comparing face-to-face and computer mediate communication. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tang, G. M., & Tithecott, J. (1999). Peer response in ESL writing. TESL Canada Journal, 16(2), 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tsui, A., & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 147–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  14. Watanabe, Y. (2008). Peer–peer interaction between L2 learners of different proficiency levels: Their interactions and reflections. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(4), 605–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 121–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zheng, C. (2012). Understanding the learning process of peer feedback activity: An ethnographic study of exploratory practice. Language Teaching Research, 16(1), 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Friginal
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joseph J. Lee
    • 2
  • Brittany Polat
    • 3
  • Audrey Roberson
    • 4
  1. 1.Applied Linguistics and ESLGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Ohio UniversityAthensUSA
  3. 3.Georgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  4. 4.Hobart and William Smith CollegesGenevaUSA

Personalised recommendations