An Evaluation Dataset for Linked Data Profiling

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10318)

Abstract

Since the beginning of the Linked Open Data initiative, the number of published Linked Data datasets has gradually increased. However, the reuse of datasets is hindered by a lack of descriptive and reliable metadata about the nature of the data, such as their topic coverage. Manual curation of metadata is however costly and hard to maintain, because of which we advocate a Linked Data profiling approach that will be able to automatically extract topics from datasets as metadata. One of the main challenges in developing this is the lack of evaluation data, i.e. manually curated metadata (topics) for datasets. In this paper we describe such an evaluation dataset and the framework that enabled its creation.

Keywords

Linked Data Linked Data profiling Topic extraction Metadata Evaluation dataset 

References

  1. 1.
    Chiarcos, C., Hellmann, S., Nordhoff, S.: Linking linguistic resources: examples from the open linguistics working group. In: Chiarcos, C., Nordhoff, S., Hellmann, S. (eds.) Linked Data in Linguistics: Representing Language Data and Metadata, pp. 201–216. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Freeman, L.C.: A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40, 35–41 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Salton, G., McGill, M.J.: Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval, pp. 402–403. McGraw-Hill, New York (1983). ISBN 0-07-054484-0MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Auer, S., Bizer, C., Kobilarov, G., Lehmann, J., Cyganiak, R., Ives, Z.: DBpedia: a nucleus for a web of open data. In: Aberer, K., et al. (eds.) ASWC/ISWC -2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 722–735. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_52 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blanco, R., Ottaviano, G., Meij, E.: Fast and space-efficient entity linking for queries. In: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 179–188. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pappu, A., Blanco, R., Mehdad, Y., Stent, A., Thadani, K.: Lightweight multilingual entity extraction and linking. In: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 365–374. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fetahu, B., Dietze, S., Pereira Nunes, B., Antonio Casanova, M., Taibi, D., Nejdl, W.: A scalable approach for efficiently generating structured dataset topic profiles. In: Presutti, V., d’Amato, C., Gandon, F., d’Aquin, M., Staab, S., Tordai, A. (eds.) ESWC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8465, pp. 519–534. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07443-6_35 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web. Technical report, Stanford InfoLab (1999). http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/422/
  9. 9.
    Abele, A., McCrae, J.P., Buitelaar, P., Jentzsch, A., Cyganiak, R.: Linked Open Data cloud diagram 2017. http://lod-cloud.net/
  10. 10.
    Schmachtenberg, M., Bizer, C., Paulheim, H.: State of the LOD Cloud 2014. Data and Web Science Group, University of Mannheim, 30 August 2014Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Insight Centre for Data AnalyticsNational University of Ireland, GalwayGalwayIreland

Personalised recommendations