Migration Matters: Insights into Intergenerational Solidarity Patterns in Europe
Intergenerational transfers of money, time, and space are important manifestations of functional solidarity in contemporary societies. Whereas previous studies have mainly addressed the causes and consequences of intergenerational support of natives, the population of foreign origin has often been neglected or limited to a specific (ethnic) population. Therefore, this study focuses on intergenerational functional solidarity patterns between migrants and natives as well as within migrant families using the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Overall, the empirical analyses prove that European families are strongly connected by different forms of functional solidarity. However, migration does matter. In addition to differences between natives and migrants, the analyses also highlight specific patterns within migrants according to household composition, duration of stay, and country of origin.
This chapter uses data from SHARE Waves 1, 2, and 5 (DOIs: https://doi.org/10.6103/SHARE.w1.500, https://doi.org/10.6103/SHARE.w2.500, https://doi.org/10.6103/SHARE.w5.500), see Börsch-Supan et al. (2013) for methodological details. The SHARE data collection has been primarily funded by the European Commission through FP5 (QLK6-CT-2001-00360), FP6 (SHARE-I3: RII-CT-2006-062193, COMPARE: CIT5-CT-2005-028857, SHARELIFE: CIT4-CT-2006-028812) and FP7 (SHARE-PREP: N°211909, SHARE-LEAP: N°227822, SHARE M4: N°261982). Additional funding from the German Ministry of Education and Research, the U.S. National Institute on Aging (U01_AG09740-13S2, P01_AG005842, P01_AG08291, P30_AG12815, R21_AG025169, Y1-AG-4553-01, IAG_BSR06-11, OGHA_04-064) and from various national funding sources is gratefully acknowledged (see www.share-project.org).
- Baykara-Krumme, H. 2008. Immigrant Families in Germany. Intergenerational Solidarity in Later Life. Berlin: Weissensee Verlag.Google Scholar
- Gordon, M.M. 1964. Assimilation in American Life. The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hofstede, G.H. 1984. Culture’s Consequences. International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
- ———. 2001. Culture’s Consequences. Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. 1996. Family and Human Development Across Cultures. A View from the Other Side. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Lesthaeghe, R.J., and W.G. Axinn. 2002. Meaning and Choice. Value Orientations and Life Course Decisions. The Hague/Brussels: NIDI/CBGS Publications.Google Scholar
- Nauck, B. 2007. Immigrant Families in Germany. Family Change Between Situational Adaptation, Acculturation, Segregation and Remigration. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung 19 (1): 34–54.Google Scholar
- Nosaka, A., and A. Chasiotis. 2005. Exploring the Variation in Intergenerational Relationships Among Germans and Turkish Immigrants: An Evolutionary Perspective on Behaviour in a Modern Social Setting. In Grandmotherhood. The Evolutionary Significance of the Second Half of Female Life, ed. E. Voland, A. Chasiotis, and W. Schiefenhovel. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- OECD. 2004. Main Economic Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- ———. 2016. Foreign Population (Indicator). https://data.oecd.org/migration/foreign-born-population.htm. Accessed 24 Apr 2016.
- Park, R.E. 1964. Race and Culture. Glencoe: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
- Phalet, K., and D. Güngör. 2009. Cultural Continuity and Discontinuity in Turkish Immigrant Families. Extending the Model of Family Change. In Perspectives on Human Development, Family, and Culture, ed. S. Bekman and A. Aksu-Koç. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Portes, A., and M. Zhou. 2005. The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants. In The New Immigration. An Interdisciplinary Reader, ed. M.M. Suárez-Orozco, C. Suárez-Orozco, and D. Qin-Hilliard. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Rabe-Hesketh, S., and A. Skrondal. 2008. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.Google Scholar
- Schans, D., and H.A.G. de Valk. 2012. Filial Obligations Among Migrants and Dutch. A Comparison of Perceptions and Behaviour Among Ethnic Groups and Generations. In Gender, Generations and the Family in International Migration, ed. A. Kraler, E. Kofman, M. Kohli, and C. Schmoll. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
- Schimany, P., S. Rühl, and M. Kohls. 2012. Ältere Migrantinnen und Migranten. Entwicklungen, Lebenslagen, Perspektiven. Nürnberg: Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge.Google Scholar
- Szydlik, M. 2016. Sharing Lives – Adult Children and Parents. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Warnes, T. 2010. Migration and Age. In The SAGE Handbook of Social Gerontology, ed. D. Dannefer and C. Phillipson. London: Sage.Google Scholar