‘Scotland in the United Kingdom: An Enduring Settlement’?

  • Alan PageEmail author


The Scotland Act 2016 makes extensive changes to the Scottish devolution settlement in implementation of the Vow made by the leaders the three main political parties at Westminster in the final days of the referendum campaign. This chapter outlines the principal changes made to the settlement by the new Scotland Act and asks whether it provides the basis for an enduring settlement between Scotland and the rest of the United Kingdom. The Scottish constitutional debate has been largely about ‘self-rule’ rather than ‘shared rule’: the acquisition by Scotland of control over its ‘own affairs’ rather than Scotland’s ‘voice’ in relation to ‘reserved matters’, i.e. those matters which continue to be dealt with at the UK level of government. The model on which the original devolution settlement was based was one of dual rather than cooperative federalism in which decisions in relation to reserved matters would continue to be taken in much the same way as before. Intergovernmental relations provide one means by which the devolved administrations may seek to influence reserved matters, but ‘intergovernmental relations in the UK remain weakly institutionalized and more ad hoc than is the case in more established federal political systems, and provide only limited opportunities to participate in UK decision-making’. The revised settlement will put a premium on cooperation between the two levels of government, particularly in the field of welfare. Whether that will materialise, and with it, a different—more cooperative, less centre-dominated—mind set at the heart of government remains to be seen. On that, however, the success of the revised settlement may well depend.


Devolution Federalism Self-rule Shared rule Intergovernmental relations 


  1. Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law (2015) A constitutional crossroads: ways forward for the United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  2. Bogdanor V (2009) The new British constitution. Hart Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Commission on Scottish Devolution (2009) Serving Scotland better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st centuryGoogle Scholar
  4. Evans A (2015) Back to the future? Warnings from history for a future UK constitutional convention. Polit Q 86:24–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gallagher J (2015a) All aboard the constitutional express? Where is the Scotland bill taking the UK? Available at:
  6. Gallagher J (2015b) ‘Through a glass, darkly. Glimpsing Scotland’s constitutional future’, lecture delivered at the University of Glasgow, 21 October 2015Google Scholar
  7. HM Government (2010) Strengthening Scotland’s future Cm 7937Google Scholar
  8. HM Government (2015) Scotland in the United Kingdom: AN enduring settlement Cm 8890Google Scholar
  9. HM Government and the Scottish Government (2016) The agreement between the Scottish Government and the United Kingdom Government on the Scottish Government’s fiscal frameworkGoogle Scholar
  10. Kilbrandon Commission (1973) Report of the Royal Commission on the Constitution 1969–1973 Cmnd 5460Google Scholar
  11. King A (2007) The British constitution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Lord Steel of Aikwood (2003) Donald Dewar Memorial lectureGoogle Scholar
  13. McCrone D (2015) A good servant but a poor master: the difficulties of proposing a written UK constitution in the aftermath of the independence. Available at:
  14. McEwen N (2016) A constitution in flux: the dynamics of constitutional change after the referendum. In: McHarg A et al (eds) The Scottish independence referendum: constitutional and political implications. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Scottish Constitutional Convention (1995) Scotland’s Parliament, Scotland’s RightGoogle Scholar
  16. Scottish Government (2007) Choosing Scotland’s constitutional future: a national conversationGoogle Scholar
  17. Scottish Government (2013) Scotland’s future: your guide to an independent ScotlandGoogle Scholar
  18. Scottish Office (1997) Scotland’s Parliament Cm 3658Google Scholar
  19. Simeon R (2009) Constitutional design and change in federal systems: issues and questions. Publius 39:241–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Smith Commission (2014) Report of the Smith commission for further devolution of powers to the Scottish ParliamentGoogle Scholar
  21. Watts RL (2008) Comparing federal systems, 3rd edn. McGill-Queen’s University Press, MontrealGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of DundeeDundeeUK

Personalised recommendations