A Risk–Reward Model for On-line Financial Leasing Problem with an Interest Rate

  • Xiaoli Chen
  • Weijun XuEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10336)


As an important financing tool, the financial lease can help the lessee obtain the ownership of equipment after paying the rent till the expiration of the lease. Because the lessee does not know the exact length of using the equipment, the financial leasing problem can be viewed as an on-line problem. In this paper, we consider the on-line financial leasing problem with an interest rate where there are two lease options: financial lease and operating lease. We first discuss the traditional deterministic optimal competitive strategy by competitive analysis method. Next, we introduce the risk tolerance and forecast of the decision maker(the lessee) into this problem and acquire the optimal risk–reward strategy. Finally, we give numerical examples and the results show that the introduction of the interest rate and risk tolerance has a significant influence on the deterministic optimal strategy and risk–reward strategy.


Financial leasing Interest rate Risk tolerance Risk–reward model Competitive analysis 



This paper was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant no. 71471065.


  1. 1.
    White, E.: White Clarke Global Leasing Report. White Clarke Group, Buckinghamshire (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borodin, A., El-Yaniv, R.: Online Algorithms and Competitive Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alvers, S.: Online algorithms: a survey. Math. Program. 97, 3–26 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karp, R.: Online algorithms versus offline algorithms: how much is it worth to know the future? In: IFIP 12th World Computer Congress, pp. 416–429. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam (1992)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    El-Yaniv, R., Kaniel, R., Linial, N.: Competitive optimal online leasing. Algorithmica 25, 116–140 (1999)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xu, Y.F., Xu, W.J., Li, H.Y.: On the on-line rent-or-buy problem in probabilistic environments. J. Glob. Optim. 38(1), 1–20 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Epstein, L., Zebedat-Haider, H.: Rent or buy problems with a fixed time horizon. Theory Comput. Syst. 56(2), 309–329 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lotker, Z., Patt-Shamir, B., Rawitz, D.: Rent, lease, or buy: randomized algorithms for multislope ski rental. SIAM J. Discret. Math. 26(2), 718–736 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fujiwara, H., Kitano, T., Fujito, T.: On the best possible competitive ratio for the multislope ski-rental problem. J. Comb. Optim. 31(2), 463–490 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Al-Binali, S.: A risk-reward framework for the competitive analysis of financial games. Algorithmica 25, 99–115 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang, Y., Zhang, W.G., Xu, W.J., Li, H.Y.: A risk-reward model for the on-line leasing of depreciable equipment. Inf. Process. Lett. 111(6), 256–261 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dai, W.Q., Dong, Y.C., Zhang, X.T.: Competitive analysis of the online financial lease problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250, 865–873 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business AdministrationSouth China University of TechnologyGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations